UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

☑  Filed by the Registrant                        x  Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x
 Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
 Definitive Additional Materials
¨
 Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

STERICYCLE, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

LOGO

STERICYCLE, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

(5)

 
(5)

Total fee paid:

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

(2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

(3)

 

Filing Party:

 

 

(4)

 

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

We protect what matters.


2019 PROXY STATEMENT

Our Company

At A Glance

Stericycle is a globalbusiness-to-business services company. We provide an
array of highly specialized solutions serving healthcare organizations and
commercial businesses of every size. Since our founding in 1989, we have
grown from a smallstart-up in medical waste management into a leader
across a range of increasingly complex and highly regulated arenas, such
as:

 Regulated waste management and compliance solutions

 Secure information destruction

 Environmental and sustainable solutions

 Brand protection solutions

 Patient and customer communication solutions

Every organization today must comply with increasingly strict regulatory
guidelines and quality controls in the delivery of their core businesses.
Large or small, businesses can’t always do it on their own. They seek out
Stericycle to help them. We have the expertise and passion to take on
many complicated and oftenbehind-the-scenes services our clients don’t
always know how to do well but that ultimately make their businesses
better.

OUR PURPOSE:

To help our customers fulfill their
promises by providing solutions
that protect people and brands,
promote health and safeguard
the environment.

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

FOUNDED IN 1989 HEADQUARTERS LAKE FOREST, IL 2017 REVENUE OF $3.6 BILLION 680+ locations IN 21 COUNTRIES MORE THAN ONE MILLION CUSTOMERS WORLDWIDE 23,200+TEAM MEMBERS

 

 


Letter from the Chairman

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS –

At the beginning of 2018, Stericycle announced a comprehensive, multi-year program to transform the Company for long-term sustainability and to drive profitable growth and long-term shareholder returns. As part of this Business Transformation, we are rationalizing our business portfolio and monetizingnon-strategic assets, standardizing business processes around the globe and driving a metrics-driven culture. The backbone of this Transformation is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) platform which we expect will achieve efficiencies by reducing the number of information technology platforms, automating workflows, streamlining operations, and providing real-time, actionable data to all levels of the organization.

A similar transformation is underway regarding Stericycle’s governance. Over the past several years, the Board of Directors has been executing on a series of purposeful steps to evolve our governance, executive leadership, and financial controls. I’d like to take this opportunity to share this progress with you.

Governance Enhancements Aligned with Best Practices

The Board is focused on ensuring that we have the right skills and experience and fresh perspective on the Board to support the Company and provide effective oversight during the Business Transformation. To that end, we have added seven new Directors since the beginning of 2017.

With this continued refreshment and our two recently appointed directors, our Board will have an average tenure of approximately two and half years with no members (excluding the Chief Executive Officer, who has announced his retirement) having served as a director of Stericycle for more than seven years. In comparison, the average tenure for the S&P 500 and Russell 3000 is nine years.

I was appointed as Independent Chairman in 2018 after joining the Board in 2017, and we have refreshed the composition and leadership of all of our Board committees during this time.

Our skills matrix (included with the enclosed proxy statement) highlights the depth and breadth of our Board’s diverse skills, experiences and attributes, including significant experience with business transformation and financial controls.

Expanded Stericycle’s Leadership Team Breadth of Expertise

In addition to these significant changes to the Board, we have reconstituted the executive leadership team to ensure we have the right expertise and operational experience necessary to successfully drive the Company forward. Earlier this year we announced that Cindy J. Miller, who joined Stericycle as President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2018, will succeed Charlie A. Alutto as Chief Executive Officer, following Charlie’s retirement in May 2019. Cindy’s appointment as CEO was the culmination of a thoughtful executive leadership development and succession planning process designed to ensure the Company is strongly positioned to execute its Business Transformation and enhance financial and operational performance.

In addition to Cindy’s appointment as CEO, since 2017, we have appointed six new, highly-experienced executives to our senior leadership team:

William J. Seward as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer;

Richard M. Moore as Executive Vice President of North American Operations;

Joseph A. Reuter as Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer;

Michael Weisman as Executive Vice President and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer;

Kurt M. Rogers as Executive Vice President and General Counsel; and

David W. Stahl as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer.

Additionally, Daniel Ginnetti, currently Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will transition to the position of Executive Vice President of International upon the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer.


Strengthening Internal Controls

The Board, and particularly the Audit Committee, has been deeply engaged in overseeing the Company’s efforts to improve financial reporting, controls and disclosures, and we’ve made substantial progress since 2016. Moreover, following the implementation of the new ERP system (targeted to begin in the U.S. and Canada during 2020 and internationally in 2021), Stericycle expects to benefit from significantly enhanced systems and processes that will streamline and automate financial controls and reporting. Some highlights of this progress include:

Stericycle has upgraded and expanded corporate and business unit finance, accounting and reporting, and information technology teams, and aligned incentive plans with effective internal controls.

With the guidance of industry-leading experts, we’ve been working diligently to mitigate material weaknesses and have made significant progress expanding policies, standardizing control processes, segregating duties, formalizing routine financial reviews, and training team members.

We’ve expanded our technical accounting team and the use of specialist involvement fornon-routine transactions, highly complex areas of accounting, and adoption of new accounting standards to ensure appropriate accounting.

We are leveraging advanced technology to monitor revenue recognition activities and implemented continuous monitoring of global financial reporting controls.

We’ve created a robust Disclosure Committee Process led by the General Counsel and Chief Accounting Officer.

The Board of Directors believes strongly that Stericycle is an excellent company and we are excited about its future. We enjoy a leadership position in our large and growing core markets. Our business model focused on compliance-based, recurring service needs remains sound. Our customers are loyal and respond with strong satisfaction scores. Our team members are talented industry experts who have a passion for the work they do.

While the Company’s growth has been stagnant for the past two years, we believe it is a temporary and transitional phase. Stericycle is in the process of reinventing itself and reimagining its future and the changes are apparent in almost everything we do, from servicing our customers, to leading our teams, to advancing the technology we use, and to oversight and engagement from the Board.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your investment in Stericycle. We ask for your voting support of our recommended actions on the items described in this proxy statement and will continue to work diligently to earn and keep your trust.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Robert S. Murley

Chairman


LOGO

NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2016Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Dear Stockholder:8:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time

Loews Chicago O’Hare Hotel

5300 N. River Road

Rosemont, IL 60018

DEAR STOCKHOLDER:

You are cordially invited to attend our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 201622, 2019 at 11:008:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time at the DoubleTree HotelLoews Chicago O’Hare Airport-Rosemont, 5460 NorthHotel, 5300 N. River Road, Rosemont, IllinoisIL 60018.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on the following matters:

 

the election to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the 10 nominees for director named in this proxy statement;

1.

the election to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the ten nominees for director named in this proxy statement;

 

approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan;

2.

an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the“say-on-pay” vote);

 

ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;

3.

ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;

 

an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the “say-on-pay” vote);

4.

a stockholder proposal entitled Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement, if it is properly presented at our Annual Meeting; and

 

a stockholder proposal on an independent chairman;

a stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”; and

any other matter that properly comes before the meeting.

5.

any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date of March 28, 20162019 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Admission to the Annual Meeting requires an admissions card. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please complete and return the Admission Request Form on the back cover of this proxy statement and an admissions card will be mailedemail your request to you.Investor@Stericycle.com. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you must also provide confirmation of your stock ownership with your Admission Request Form.ownership. All Admission Request Formsrequests for admission must be received by May 18, 2016. An admissions card15, 2019. Admission is not transferable. If you need directions to the meeting, please call Investor Relations at (800) 643-0240 ext. 2012.

For the convenience of our stockholders of record who do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person but who want their shares voted, we have enclosed a proxy card. If you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please completepromptly vote your shares by telephone, via the internet atwww.proxyvote.com,or, if you received a paper copy of the materials, by signing, dating and returnreturning the accompanying proxy card in the envelope provided or go towww.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions.voting instruction card. If you return your proxy card and later decide to attend the Annual Meeting and then vote in person, your earlier proxy card (or earlier vote by telephone or Internet) will be revoked. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting, by itself, does not revoke an earlier proxy. If for any other reason you want to revoke your proxy, you may do so at any time before your proxy is voted.

For the Board of Directors

Dated: April 10, 2019

Lake Forest, Illinois

 

LOGOLOGO LOGOLOGO
Charles A. Alutto
Robert S. Murley Mark C.Cindy J. Miller
President and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Chairman of the Board

President and Chief Operating Officer

Chief Executive Officer Elect

April 15, 2016

Lake Forest, Illinois

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the 2016 2019

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 25, 201622, 2019:

The Proxy Statement, Notice of Annual Meeting and

2015 2018 Annual Report to

Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com


Summary Information

 

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement1


Table of Contents

SUMMARY INFORMATION4
GENERAL INFORMATION6
STOCK OWNERSHIP10
Stock Ownership by Directors and Officers10
Stock Ownership of Certain Stockholders11

ITEM  1   ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM

12
Voting in Uncontested Director Elections12
Board Refreshment12
Nominees for Director14
Director Qualifications16
Committees of the Board18
Board Leadership20
Corporate Governance21
Code of Conduct25
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance25
Additional Information25
Communications with the Board25
Director Compensation26

ITEM  2   ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

28
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS29
Executive Summary29
Our Compensation-Setting Process32
2018 Compensation Program Highlights33
Our Executive Compensation Program for 201938
Other Compensation Matters40
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT42
2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE43
2018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS45
2018 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END47

2Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


2018 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED50

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGEIN-CONTROL

51
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation52

ITEM  3   RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019

55
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT57

ITEM  4   STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ENTITLED SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING IMPROVEMENT

58
OTHER MATTERS60
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING60
APPENDIX A DEFINITION AND RECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP MEASURES61

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement3


SUMMARY INFORMATION

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. It does not contain all information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. In this proxy statement, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Stericycle” and the “Company” all refer to Stericycle, Inc.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSAnnual Meeting of Stockholders

 

 

•  Time and Date:

11:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 25, 2016

•  Place:

  

DoubleTree Hotel8:30 a.m. central daylight time on Wednesday, May 22, 2019

 Place:

Loews Chicago O’Hare Airport-RosemontHotel

5460 North5300 N. River Road

Rosemont, IllinoisIL 60018

•  Record Date:

  

March 28, 20162019

•  Voting:

  

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote

•  Attendance:

  Admission to the meeting requires an admissions card.

Stockholders who wish to attend the meeting in person must complete and return an Admissions Request Formshould email their request toInvestor@Stericycle.com by May 18, 201615, 2019.

 Proxy Materials:

This proxy statement and our annual report to receive an admissions cardstockholders (which includes a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018) are first being made available to stockholders on or about April 10, 2019.

MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONSMeeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

 

 

Agenda Item

Board

Recommendation

    Board
Recommendation
Page

Election of 10ten directors

  

FOR EACH NOMINEE

8

Approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan each Nominee

    FOR

12 

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the“say-on-pay” vote)

  34

FOR

28 

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019

  

FOR

    39

55 

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the “say-on-pay” vote)

FOR40

Stockholder proposal on independent chairman

AGAINST41

Stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

  

AGAINST

    44

58 



 

BOARD NOMINEES
4Stericycle, Inc. - 2018 Proxy Statement


Board Nominees

 

The following table provides summary information about the nominees for director. Each director is elected by a majority of votes cast.

 

Nominee

  Age   Director
Since
  Principal Occupation Committees

Mark C. Miller

   60     1992   Executive Chairman of the Board, Stericycle, Inc. None

Jack W. Schuler

   75     1990   Lead Director and former Chairman, Stericycle, Inc.; former president and chief operating officer, Abbott Laboratories; former chairman, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.; co-founder and partner, Crabtree Partners LLC 

•  Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Charles A. Alutto

   50     2012   President and Chief Executive Officer, Stericycle Inc. None

Lynn D. Bleil

   52     2015   Former Senior Partner, McKinsey & Company 

•  Audit

  Nominee Age  

Director

Since

  Principal Occupation Current Committees

Robert S. Murley

 69  2017  

Chairman of the Board, Stericycle, Inc.;

Senior advisor, Credit Suisse, LLC

 

None

Cindy J. Miller(1)

 56  2019  

President and Chief Operating Officer, Stericycle Inc.

Chief Executive Officer Elect

 None

Brian P. Anderson

 68  2017  Former executive vice president of OfficeMax Incorporated 

   Audit (Chair)

Lynn D. Bleil

 55  2015  Former senior partner McKinsey & Company 

   Compensation

 

   Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Thomas F. Chen

 69  2014  Former senior vice president and president of international nutrition, Abbott Laboratories 

   Compensation

 

   Nominating and Governance

J. Joel Hackney, Jr.

 49  2019  Chief Executive Officer of nThrive, Inc. 

   Nominating and Governance

Veronica M. Hagen

 73  2018  Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Polymer Group Inc. 

   Audit

Stephen C. Hooley

 56  2019  Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DST Systems, Inc. 

   Compensation

Kay G. Priestly

 63  2018  Former Chief Executive Officer of Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. 

   Audit

Mike S. Zafirovski(2)

 65  2012  Former director, president and chief executive officer of Nortel Networks Corporation. 

   Compensation

 

   Nominating and Governance

(1)

Ms. Miller was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer effective May 2, 2019.

 

(2)

Mr. Zafirovski is expected to be named as Chair of the Compensation Committee at the Board Meeting to be held in May 2019. He will succeed the current committee Chair, Thomas D. Brown, who is not standing forre-election at the Annual Meeting.


Nominee

  Age   Director
Since
   Principal Occupation Committees

Thomas D. Brown

   68     2008    Former senior vice president and president of the diagnostics division, Abbott Laboratories 

•   Compensation

Thomas F. Chen

   66     2014    Former senior vice president and president of international nutrition, Abbott Laboratories 

•   Audit

Rod F. Dammeyer

   75     1998    Chairman, CAC, LLC; former vice chairman, Anixter International; former managing partner, Equity Group Investments, LLC. 

•   Audit (Chair)

•   Nominating and Governance

William K. Hall

   72     2006    Former chairman and chief executive officer, Procyon Technologies, Inc.; former chairman and chief executive officer, Falcon Building Products, Inc. 

•   Compensation (Chair)

John Patience

   68     1989    Chairman of the board of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc.; co-founder and partner, Crabtree Partners LLC; former vice chairman, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.; former partner, McKinsey & Company 

•   Audit

•   Nominating and Governance

Mike S. Zafirovski

   62     2012    Former director, president and chief executive officer of Nortel Networks Corporation; former director, president and chief operating officer of Motorola, Inc.; former president and chief executive officer of General Electric Lighting 

•   Compensation

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Highlights

 

Our compensation program is performance-orientedperformance oriented and designed to provide strong incentives toincent our executive officers to continue to improve our operating performance and thereby create value for all of our stockholders. The following table sets forth the 20152018 compensation for each named executive officer as determined under SEC rules.the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). See the notes accompanying the Summary Compensation Table on page 25herein for more information.

 

Named Executive Officer

  Salary   Bonus   Option Awards   

All Other

Compensation

   Total
Compensation
 

Charles A. Alutto

  $488,269    $465,327    $2,510,200    $1,750    $3,465,546  

Mark C. Miller

  $147,462    $87,194    $753,060    $1,750    $989,466  

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  $346,923    $234,871    $1,026,900    $1,750    $1,610,444  

Brent Arnold

  $343,077    $234,871    $1,026,900    $1,750    $1,606,598  

Michael J. Collins

  $342,500    $205,703    $753,060    $1,750    $1,303,013  

  Named Executive Officer Salary  Bonus  Option
Awards
  Stock
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  All Other
Compensation
  

Total 

Compensation 

 

Charles A. Alutto

 $1,000,000     $1,289,942  $ 1,582,185  $ 241,800  $5,693  $  4,119,620  

Cindy J. Miller

  156,250      894,995   822,209      33,526   1,906,980  

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  550,000      482,280   591,531  $99,743   3,000   1,726,554  

Kurt M. Rogers

  400,000      244,217   299,529  $58,032   3,000   1,004,778  

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  370,000  $327,541   234,438   287,535  $58,153   26,681   1,304,348  

Joseph B. Arnold

  550,000      482,280   591,531  $99,743   1,012,005   2,735,559  

Brenda R. Frank

  367,692  $198,616   252,546   309,704      19,571   1,148,129  


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents


 

GENERAL INFORMATIONStericycle, Inc.

- 2019 Proxy Statement
  1

STOCK OWNERSHIP

6

Stock Ownership by Directors and Officers

6

Stock Ownership of Certain Stockholders

7

ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

8

Voting in Uncontested Director Elections

8

Nominees for Director

8

Director Qualifications

10

Committees of the Board

11

Compensation Committee

11

Audit Committee

11

Nominating and Governance Committee

11

Committee Charters

12

Committee Members and Meetings

13

Lead Director

13

Corporate Governance

14

Executive Sessions of the Board

14

Board Evaluation

14

Policy on Related Party Transactions

14

Succession Planning

14

Required Resignation on Change in Job Responsibilities

14

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

15

Clawback Policy

15

Risk Oversight

15

Communications with the Board

15

Equity Compensation Plans

16

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

17

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

18

Overview

18

Compensation Decisions

20

Base Salaries

21

Annual Cash Performance Bonuses

21

Stock Options

22

Restricted Stock Units 

22

Retirement Plans and Deferred Compensation Arrangements

225 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Perquisites and Personal Benefits

22

Employment Agreements

22

Termination and Change-in-Control Payments

23

Stock Ownership Requirements

23

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

24

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

25

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

27

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

28

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

30

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

31

Compensation in 2015

31

Outside Directors Compensation Plan

32

Stock Ownership Requirements

32

Meeting and Other Fees

32

Option Grants to New Directors

33

ITEM  2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

34

ITEM  3 RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016

39

ITEM  4 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

40

ITEM  5 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN

41

ITEM  6 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ENTITLED “SHAREHOLDER PROXY ACCESS”

44

OTHER MATTERS

47

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING

48

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

49

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

50

EXHIBIT A: STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

A-1


GENERAL INFORMATION

LOGO

28161 North Keith Drive

Lake Forest, Illinois 60045

PROXY STATEMENT

2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held on May 25, 2016

In this proxy statement, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Stericycle”Why Did I Receive This Proxy Statement and the “Company” all refer to Stericycle, Inc.

General Information

WHY DID I RECEIVE THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER MATERIALS?Other Materials?

 

 

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Stericycle, Inc. is soliciting proxies to vote shares of our common stock at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 201622, 2019 at 11:008:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time,central daylight time, at the DoubleTree HotelLoews Chicago O’Hare Airport-Rosemont, 5460 NorthHotel, 5300 N. River Road, Rosemont, IllinoisIL 60018.

This proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders (which includes a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015)2018), are first being made available to stockholders on or about April 15, 2016.10, 2019. Although both are made available together, our annual report to stockholders is not part of this proxy statement.

 

WHAT WILL STOCKHOLDERS VOTE ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?What Will Stockholders Vote on at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Stockholders will vote on following matters at the Annual Meeting:

 

the election to the Board of the 10ten nominees for director named in this proxy statement (Item 1);

 

approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Planan advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the“say-on-pay” vote) (Item 2);

 

ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019 (Item 3);

an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (the “say-on-pay” vote) (Item 4);

a stockholder proposal on an independent chairman (Item 5);

a stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting (Item 6),4); and

 

any other matter that properly comes before the meeting.

Annual Meeting.

 

WHAT ARE THE BOARD’S VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS?What Are the Board’s Voting Recommendations?

 

 

The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

 

FOR each of the 10ten nominees for election to the Board (Item 1);

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 1


GENERAL INFORMATION

FOR approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Item 2);

 

FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Item 2);

FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019 (Item 3);

and

 

FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Item 4);

AGAINST the stockholder proposal on an independent chairman (Item 5); and

4).

AGAINST the stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access” (Item 6).

 

WHO MAY VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?Who May Vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 28, 20162019 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock as of the record date is entitled to one vote on all matters that come before the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.

 

As of the close of business on the record date of March 28, 2016,2019, there were 84,815,10490,771,802 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

 

WHY DIDWhy Did I RECEIVE ONLY A ONE-PAGE NOTICE IN THE MAIL REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS INSTEAD OF RECEIVING A FULL SET OF PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS?Receive Only aOne-Page Notice in the Mail Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials Instead of Receiving a Full Set of Printed Proxy Materials?

 

 

In accordance with the “notice and access” rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders, over the Internet,internet, and accordingly, we mailed our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) on or about April 15, 2016.10, 2019. This Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet,internet, how to request a printed or

electronic copy of these materials and how to vote by Internet,internet, telephone or mail. The voting facilities over the Internetinternet or by telephone will remain open until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Timeeastern daylight time on May 24, 2016.

21, 2019.

The Notice is not a proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares.

6Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


GENERAL INFORMATION

 

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES HELD IN STREET NAME?What Is the Difference Between a Stockholder of Record and a Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name?

 

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our stock registrar and transfer agent, Wells FargoEQ Shareowner Services, you are considered the stockholder of record for those shares and have the right to vote those shares directly. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy.

If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee (for convenient reference, a “broker”), you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, which are said to be held in “street name,” and the broker is considered the stockholder of record for voting

purposes. As the beneficial owner you cannot vote the shares in your account directly, but you have the right to instruct the broker how to vote them.

As a beneficial owner, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, but because you are not a stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a valid proxy from your broker.

See “How Can I Attend the Annual Meeting?” below for further information and instructions.

 

IFIf I AM A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD, HOW DOAm a Stockholder of Record, How Do I VOTE?Vote?

 

 

You may vote in several ways. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, or you may vote by proxy over the Internetinternet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 2


GENERAL INFORMATION

In addition, if you request copies of our proxy materials in printed form, you may vote by completing and signing the proxy card included in the materials and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

 

IFIf I AM A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES HELD IN STREET NAME, HOW DOAm a Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name, How Do I INSTRUCT MY BROKER HOW TO VOTE?Instruct My Broker How to Vote?

 

 

If you are a beneficial owner of our common stock, the Notice was forwarded to you by your broker. You may instruct your broker how to vote over the Internetinternet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice.by your broker.

In addition, if you request copies of our proxy materials in printed form, you may instruct your broker how to vote by completing and signing the voting instruction card included in the materials and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

 

WHAT HAPPENS IFWhat Happens if I AM A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING CHOICES?Am a Stockholder of Record and Sign and Return the Proxy Card But Do Not Make Any Voting Choices?

 

 

The proxy holders (the persons named as proxies) will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s voting recommendations for Items 1 2, 3,through 4 5 and 6.described in this proxy statement. See “What areAre the Board’s voting recommendations?Voting Recommendations?” above.

 

We do not expect that any other matters will properly come before the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters do come before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their judgment.

 

WHAT HAPPENS IFWhat Happens if I AM A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES HELD IN STREET NAME AND DO NOT GIVE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO MY BROKER?Am a Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name and Do Not Give Voting Instructions to My Broker?

 

 

Under the stock exchange and other rules governing brokers who are voting shares held in street name, brokers have authority to vote those shares at their discretion on “routine” matters but may not vote those shares on “non-routine”“non-routine” matters. The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019 (Item 3) is considered a routine matter under the relevant rules. All of the other items to be voted on (Items 1, 2 4, 5 and 6)4) are considerednon-routine matters.

A “brokernon-vote” occurs when your broker returns a proxy card for your shares held in street name but does not vote on

a particular matter because (i) the broker has not received voting instructions from you and (ii) the broker does not have authority to vote on the matter without instructions because the matter is of anon-routine nature. Brokernon-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote when they occur. There will be not be any brokernon-votes on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019 (Item 3), because brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on this matter.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement7


GENERAL INFORMATION

 

WHAT IS THE QUORUM REQUIRED FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?What Is the Quorum Required for the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Holders of a majority of our outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who are present in person or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder of record and vote your shares by proxy, your shares will be counted for purposes of

determining whether a quorum is present even if your voting choice is to abstain. Similarly, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not give voting instructions to your broker, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present if your broker votes your shares on any routine matter.

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 3


GENERAL INFORMATION

What Are My Choices in Voting on the Matters to Be Voted on at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

WHAT ARE MY CHOICES IN VOTING ON THE MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

On Item 1 (the election of directors), you may vote “For” or “Against” each individual nominee or “Abstain” from voting on the nominee’s election.

On Item 2 (approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan)(thesay-on-pay vote), Item 3 (ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016)2019), and Item 4 (the say-on-pay vote), Item 5 (stockholder proposal on independent chairman) and Item 6 (stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”)stockholder proposal), you may vote “For” or “Against” the proposal or “Abstain” from voting on the proposal.

 

WHAT ARE THE VOTING REQUIREMENTS TO APPROVE THE MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?What Are the Voting Requirements to Approve the Matters to Be Voted on at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Item 1 (election of directors): Each nominee for election as a director will be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast and therefore must receive more “For” votes than “Against” votes in order to be elected as a director. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

 

Item 2 (approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Broker non-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

Item 3 (ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on Item 3, and therefore, there will not be any broker non-votes on this matter.

Item 4 (thesay-on-pay vote): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Brokernon-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

 

Item 5 (stockholder proposal on3 (ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent chairman)registered public accounting firm

for 2019): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on Item 3, and therefore, there will not be any brokernon-votes on this matter.

Item 4 (the stockholder proposal): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Brokernon-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

Item 6 (stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”): This proposal requires for approval the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against.” Broker non-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

 

CANCan I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTERChange My Vote after I HAVE VOTED?Have Voted?

 

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote by voting again over the Internetinternet or by telephone (before those voting facilities are closed at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Timeeastern daylight time on May 24, 2016)21, 2019) or by returning a new, properly completed proxy card bearing a later date than the date of your original proxy card. In addition, you may revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting in person and requesting to vote. Attendance at the meeting in person will

not, by itself, revoke your proxy. You may also revoke your proxy any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting by filing a signed notice of revocation with the Secretary of the Company at 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 4


GENERAL INFORMATION

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may submit new votingrevoke your proxy by following the instructions toprovided by your broker over the Internet or by telephone (before those voting facilities are closed at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 24, 2016).broker.

 

HOW CANHow Can I FIND OUT THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?Find Out the Voting Results of the Annual Meeting?

 

 

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting.Meeting, if available. The final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of elections and reported in a current reportCurrent

Report on Form8-K which we will file with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

8Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


GENERAL INFORMATION

 

WHO IS PAYING FOR THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?Who Is Paying for the Cost of This Proxy Solicitation?

 

 

We will bear the cost of this proxy solicitation. We have retained Georgeson, Inc. to help us solicit proxies. We will pay Georgeson Inc. a base fee of $20,000 plus reasonable expenses for its services. Some of our officers and employees may solicit proxies by personal conversations,

telephone, regular mail or email, but they will not receive any additional compensation for doing so. We will reimburse brokers and others for their reasonable charges and expenses in forwarding our proxy materials to stockholders who are beneficial owners of shares of our common stock.

 

MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN MY HOME ARE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF STERICYCLE COMMON STOCK. WHY DID WE RECEIVE ONLY ONE MAILING?Multiple Individuals Residing in My Home Are Beneficial Owners of Stericycle Common Stock. Why Did We Receive Only One Mailing?

 

 

We are sending only one envelope with multiple Notices to you if you share a single address with another stockholder, unless we have received instructions to the contrary from you. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to eliminate duplicate mailings, conserve natural resources and reduce our printing and mailing costs. We will promptly deliver a separate Notice to you upon written or verbal request. If you

wish to receive duplicate mailings in the future, you may contact Investor Relations, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. If you currently receive multiple Notices, you can request householding by contacting our Investor Relations as described above. If you own your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you can request householding by contacting the holder of record.

 

HOW CANHow Can I ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING?Attend the Annual Meeting?

 

 

We encourage our stockholders to attend the Annual Meeting. Admission to the meeting requires an admissions card. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please complete and return the Admission Request Form on the back cover of this proxy statement and an admissions card will be mailedemail your request to you.Investor@Stericycle.com. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you must also provide confirmation of your stock ownership with your Admission Request Form (for example, by providing a copy of a brokerage firm statement).

All Admission Request Formsrequests for admission must be received by May 18, 2016. An admissions card15, 2019. Admission is not transferable and will admit only the stockholder or stockholders to whom it was issued. If you need directions to the meeting, please call Investor Relations at (800) 643-0240 ext. 2012.

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 59


STOCK OWNERSHIP

Stock Ownership by Directors and Officers

STOCK OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The following table provides information about the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of March 28, 20162019 by (1)(i) each of our directors, and nominees for director, (2)(ii) each of our named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 25herein, and (3)(iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group:

 

  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial  Ownership(1)
   Percent of
Class(2)
 
  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
     Percent  of
Class(2)
 

Directors

          

Charles A. Alutto(3)

   568,935    * 

Brian P. Anderson

   6,752    * 

Lynn D. Bleil

   17,520    * 

Thomas D. Brown

   56,827    * 

Thomas F. Chen

   30,094    * 

J. Joel Hackney, Jr.

       * 

Veronica M. Hagen

       * 

Stephen C. Hooley

       * 

Cindy J. Miller(3)

       * 

Mark C. Miller

   1,206,369       1.4   946,620    1.0% 

Jack W. Schuler(3)

   702,071       *  

Charles A. Alutto

   278,768       *  

John Patience(3)

   200,805       *  

Thomas D. Brown

   57,776       *  

Rod F. Dammeyer(3)

   48,587       *  

William K. Hall

   36,472       *  

Robert S. Murley

   8,500    * 

Kay G. Priestly

       * 

Mike S. Zafirovski

   24,297       *     39,493    * 

Thomas F. Chen

   12,778       *  

Lynn D. Bleil

   6,507       *  

Named Executive Officers

          

Michael J. Collins

   111,660       *  

Daniel V. Ginnetti

   71,085       *     155,231    * 

Brent Arnold(3)

   67,760       *  

All directors and executive officers as a group(15 persons)

   2,830,495       3.3

Kurt M. Rogers

   5,634    * 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih(4)

   69,458    * 

Joseph B. Arnold(5)

   157,011    * 

Brenda R. Frank(6)

   784    * 

All directors, named executive officers and executive officers as a group (23 persons)

  

 

2,067,396

 

  

 

2.3%

 

*

Less than 1%.

 

(1)

This column includes shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable as of or within 60 days after March 28, 2016.2019. These shares are held as follows: Mr. Miller, 994,810Alutto 564,659 shares; Mr. Schuler, 27,100Anderson, 2,933 shares; Mr. Alutto, 277,253 shares; Mr. Patience, 50,671Ms. Bleil, 14,947 shares; Mr. Brown, 57,77647,279 shares; Mr. Dammeyer, 39,457Chen, 21,720 shares; Mr. Hall, 27,472Miller, 753,683 shares; Mr. Murley, 2,933 shares; Mr. Zafirovski, 24,297 shares; Mr. Chen 12,77832,602 shares; Ms. Bleil 6,507;Abdulmassih, 67,339 shares, Mr. Collins, 102,898Arnold, 152,998 shares; Mr. Ginnetti, 66,890 shares;148,581 shares and; Mr. Rogers, 5,296 shares. Also includes deferred stock units (“DSUs”) allocated to certain of our directors pursuant to our director compensation plan. Such DSUs are as follows: Mr. Anderson, 3,467 units; Ms. Bleil, 2,078 units; Mr. Brown, 4,933 units; Mr. Chen, 3,476 units; Mr. Murley, 4,264 units; and Mr. Arnold, 66,772 shares.Zafirovski, 3,476 units.

 

(2)

Shares of common stock issuable under a stock option exercisable as of or within 60 days after March 28, 20162019 are considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of the person holding the option but are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of any other person.

 

(3)The shares shown

Mr. Alutto and Ms. Miller are also named executive officers. Mr. Alutto will retire as beneficially owned by Mr. Schuler include 27,120 shares owned by trusts for his benefitChief Executive Officer and 29,340 shares owned by his wife, regardingas a director effective May 2, 2019. Ms. Miller has been appointed Chief Executive Officer effective as of that date.

(4)

Ms. Abdulmassih ceased employment with the latter of which Mr. Schuler disclaims any beneficial ownership. The shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Dammeyer include 9,130 shares owned by a trust for his benefit, regarding which Mr. Dammeyer disclaims any beneficial ownership. The shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Patience include 1,000 shares owned by his wife, regarding which Mr. Patience disclaims any beneficial ownership. The shares shown as beneficially owned by Company in January 2019.

(5)

Mr. Arnold include 15 shares owned by his son, regarding which Mr. Arnold disclaims any beneficial ownership.ceased to be an executive officer of the Company in September 2018.

(6)

Ms. Frank ceased employment with the Company in November 2018.

 

2016Proxy Statement10  Stericycle, Inc. • 6 - 2019 Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP

Stock Ownership of Certain Stockholders

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERSStock Ownership of Certain Stockholders

The following table provides information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who was known to us to be the beneficial owner as of the record date (March 28, 2016)2019) of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock:

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
   Percent of
Class
   Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
   Percent of
Class
 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(1)

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

   7,152,533     8.4%     8,172,270    9.02

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, New York 10055

   5,557,708     6.5%  

Brown Advisory Incorporated(3)

901 South Bond Street, Ste. 400

Baltimore, Maryland 21231

   4,865,678     5.7%  

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(2)
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202

   9,181,105    10.1

BlackRock, Inc.(3)
55 East 52ndStreet
New York, New York 10055

   7,616,828    8.4

Baillie Gifford & Co.(4)
Calton Square
1 Greenside Row
Edinburgh EH1 3AN
Scotland

   

 

5,393,108

 

 

 

   

 

5.95

 

 

(1)The shares shown as beneficially owned are derived from the

Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 4) that The Vanguard Group, Inc.13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016. The Schedule 13G indicates that The11, 2019, the Vanguard Group Inc. hadhas sole voting power over 158,363with respect to 41,023 shares, shared voting power over 8,200with respect to 10,221 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,987,050with respect to 8,129,059 shares and shared dispositive power over 165,483with respect to 43,211 shares.

 

(2)The shares shown as beneficially owned are derived from the

Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2) that BlackRock, Inc.13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016. The Schedule 13G indicates that Blackrock,11, 2019, T Rowe Price Associates, Inc. hadhas sole voting power over 4,842,461with respect to 3,711,270 shares shared voting power over 587 shares,and sole dispositive power over 5,557,121 shares, and shared dispositive power over 587with respect to 9,161,119 shares.

 

(3)The shares shown as beneficially owned are derived from the

Based on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 4) that Brown Advisory Incorporated13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016. The Schedule 13G indicates that (i) Brown Advisory Incorporated (“BA,6, 2019, BlackRock, Inc.”) had has sole voting power over 4,015,677with respect to 7,204,157 shares, shared voting power over 88,242 shares,and sole dispositive power over 0 shares, and shared dispositive power over 4,865,678 shares, (ii) Brown Advisory, LLC (“BA, LLC”) hadwith respect to 7,616,828 shares.

(4)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, Baillie Gifford & Co. has sole voting power over 3,819,543with respect to 4,610,118 shares, shared voting power over 88,242 shares,and sole dispositive power over 0 shares, and shared dispositive power over 4,669,191 shares, (iii) Brown Investment Advisory & Trust Company (“BIATC”) had sole voting power over 195,834 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 0 shares, and shared dispositive power over 196,187 shares, and (iv) Highmount Capital LLC (“Highmount”) had sole voting power over 300 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 0 shares, and shared dispositive power over 300with respect to 5,393,108 shares. According to the Schedule 13G, each of BA, LLC, BIATC and Highmount are direct or indirect subsidiaries of BA, Inc.

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 711


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

ItemITEM 1    Election of Directors for aOne-Year Term

 

Our Board is currently composed of 10thirteen directors. Mr. Alutto, Mr. Brown and Mr. Miller are not standing forre-election at the Annual Meeting. Therefore, effective as of the annual meeting of shareholders, our board of directors has fixed the size of the board at ten. With the exception of Mark C.Ms. Miller, our Executive Chairman of the Board, and Charles A. Alutto, ourcurrent President and Chief Operating Officer and our Chief Executive Officer Elect, all of our directorsdirector nominees are outside directors (i.e., directors who are neither officersan officer nor employeesan employee of ours). Mr. Murley, one of our independent directors, was elected as Chairman of the Board in March 2018. The Board has determined that all of our outside directors are independent under the applicable rules of the SEC and listing standards of the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”Nasdaq”).

Although all of the nominees proposed for election to our board of directors are currently members of our Board, Ms. Miller, Mr. Hackney, Ms. Hagen, Mr. Hooley and Ms. Priestly have not previously been elected by our stockholders. Ms. Miller was elected to our board in connection with her appointment as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hackney, Ms. Hagen, Mr. Hooley and Ms. Priestly were identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as potential directors and were recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee after it completed its interview and vetting process.

Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office until our annual meeting2020 Annual Meeting of stockholders in 2017Stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

 

VOTING IN UNCONTESTED DIRECTOR ELECTIONSVoting in Uncontested Director Elections

 

Under our bylaws, a nominee for election as a director must receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected as a director in an uncontested election (an election in which the number of nominees for election is the same as the number of directors to be elected). In other words, the nominee must receive more “for” votes than “against” votes, with abstentions and brokernon-votes not having any effect on the voting.

If a nominee for election as a director is an incumbent director and the nominee is notre-elected, Delaware law provides that the director continues to serve as a “holdover”

director until his successor is elected and qualified or until he resigns. Under our bylaws, an incumbent director who is notre-elected is required to tender his resignation as a director. Our Nominating and Governance Committee will review the circumstances and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation or take any other action. The Board is required to act on this recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind its decision within 90 days from the date that the election results are certified.

 

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORBoard Refreshment

 

A number of changes have occurred in our Company’s Board of Directors over the past several years as part of our continuing efforts to ensure that our Board has the right skills and experience to best oversee management and the execution of our strategy and the associated risks.

Since the beginning of 2017, Ms. Miller, Mr. Murley, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hackney, Ms. Hagen, Mr. Hooley and Ms. Priestly have all joined the Board. Mr. Murley, Mr. Anderson and Ms. Priestly all bring substantial experience in finance, accounting and financial reporting.

Ms. Priestly, Mr. Hackney, Ms. Hagen and Mr. Hooley each have broad experience in business transformation. In addition, since the beginning of 2017, several long-tenured directors have stepped down from the Board. The following table provides information aboutaverage tenure of the independent nominees for election as directors.a director is less than 3 years. Further, with respect to Board leadership succession, Mr. Murley was elected as independent Chairman of the Board in March 2018 and new Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees were elected in 2016 and 2017.

12Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Board Refreshment

A snapshot of our 2019 director nominees is set forth below.

Snapshot of 2019 Director Nominees

The nominees for Director are overwhelmingly independent. The nominees for Director also represent diverse points of view that contribute to a more effective decision-making process.

 

NomineeBoard Independence

  Position with the CompanyBoard Tenure  

AgeDiversity of Director

Nominees

Mark C. Miller10

Directors  

 Executive Chairman of

All Director nominees

are independent

except the Board of Directors

60

Jack W. SchulerCEO Elect

  Lead

Tenure of independent

Director

75
nominees

Charles A. Alutto(years of consecutive service)

  President, Chief Executive Officer, Director60% 

Gender, ethnic or

other minority

representation

50

Lynn D. BleilLOGO

  Director2.5 years   52

Thomas D. BrownAverage

Tenure

  DirectorLOGO
  68

Thomas F. Chen

Director66

Rod F. Dammeyer

Director75

William K. Hall

Director72

John Patience

Director68

Mike S. Zafirovski

Director62LOGO

Mark C. Miller has served as our Executive Chairman since January 2013 and director as of May 1992. He became our Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 and Chairman of the Board of Directors in August 2008, and served in each of those roles until January 2013. From May 1989 until joining us, Mr. Miller served as vice president for the Pacific, Asia and Africa in the international division of Abbott Laboratories, a diversified health

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 813


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

care company, which he joined in 1976 and where he held a number of management and marketing positions. Mr. Miller serves as a director of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc., a developer of automated diagnostics systems, and formerly served as a director of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a developer and supplier of automated diagnostic systems. He received a B.S. degree in computer science from Purdue University, where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. Mr. Miller was selected by Morningstar, Inc. as its “2009 CEO of the Year.”Nominees for Director

 

Jack W. SchulerNominees for Director

ROBERT S. MURLEY

LOGO

Director since January 2017

Age 69

Experience: Robert S. Murley has served as the Lead Director of our Board of Directors since August 2008 and served as our Chairman since March 2018. Mr. Murley is a Senior Adviser to Credit Suisse, LLC, a financial services company. From 1975 to April 2012, Mr. Murley was employed by Credit Suisse, LLC and its predecessors. In 2005, he was appointed Chairman of Investment Banking in the Board from January 1990 until becoming Lead Director. From January 1987Americas. Prior to August 1989 he servedthat time, Mr. Murley headed the Global Industrial and Services Group within the Investment Banking Division, as presidentwell as the Chicago investment banking office. He was named a Managing Director in 1984 and chief operating officer of Abbott Laboratories,appointed a diversified health care company, where he also served asVice Chairman in 1998. Mr. Murley is a director from April 1985 to August 1989. Mr. Schuler serves as a director of Quidel Corporation, a developer and manufacturer of point-of-care diagnostic tests, and Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc., a developer of automated diagnostics systems, and formerly served as chairmanmember of the board of directors of Ventana Medical Systems,Health Insurance Innovations Inc., of privately held Brown Advisory Incorporated, and asof the board of advisors of Harbour Group. He was formerly on the board of directors of Stone Energy Corporation and Apollo Education Group, Inc. Mr. Murley is an Emeritus Charter Trustee of Princeton University, a directorTrustee and the former Chairman of Hansen Medical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Amgen Incorporated, Chiron Corporation, Elan Corporation, plc,the Board of the Educational Testing Service in Princeton, New Jersey, is Vice Chairman of the Board of the Ann & Robert Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and ICOS Corporation. HeChair of the Board of the Lurie Children’s Foundation, is a co-founderTrustee of Crabtree Partners LLC,the Museum of Science & Industry in Chicago, Illinois, is Chairman of the Board of the UCLA Anderson Board of Advisors.

Skills & Qualifications: Mr. Murley’s existing public company board experience, his deep knowledge of the capital markets and the economy, and his extensive experience leading and advising a private investment firm in Lake Forest, Illinois, and isrange of businesses across multiple industries make him a former trusteevaluable member of Carleton College. Mr. Schuler received a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Tufts University and an M.B.A. degree from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business Administration.Board.

CINDY J. MILLER

 

Charles A. Alutto has served

LOGO

Director since February 2019

Age 56

Experience: Ms. Miller joined Stericycle as ourPresident and Chief Operating Officer in October 2018. She was named President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2013 and as a director since November 2012. He joined us ineffective May 1997 following our acquisition of the company where he was then employed. He became an executive officer in February 2011 and2019. Ms. Miller previously served as President, Stericycle USA. He previously held variousGlobal Freight Forwarding for United Parcel Service (UPS) from April 2016 to September 2018 and as President of UPS’s European region from March 2013 to March 2016.

Skills & Qualifications: Ms. Miller brings to the Board deep knowledge and experience in business transformation and change management, positions with us, including vice presidentoperations management, strategy, logistics, and managing director of SRCL Europe and corporate vice president of our large quantity generator business unit. Mr. Alutto received a B.S. degree in finance from Providence College and an M.B.A. degree in finance from St. John’s University.international business.

BRIAN P. ANDERSON

 

Lynn D. Bleil has

LOGO

Director since January 2017

Age 68

Experience: Mr. Anderson served as Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated from 2004 to 2005 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Baxter International from 1997 to 2004. He joined Baxter in 1991, as Vice President, Corporate Audit, became Corporate Controller in 1993 and then Vice President, Finance in 1997. Before joining Baxter, he spent 15 years with Deloitte in the Chicago office and the Washington, D.C. office as an Audit Partner. He is a director sincemember of the Board of Directors of W. W. Grainger, Inc., PulteGroup, Inc., and James Hardie Industries plc. He currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee of James Hardie Industries plc, and is the former Chairman of the Nemours Foundation, Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Pulte Group and Lead Director and Audit Committee Chairman of W. W. Grainger, Inc. Mr. Anderson serves on The Governing Board of the Center for Audit Quality and served on the Board of A.M. Castle & Co. from 2005 to 2016, as Audit Committee Chairman (2005-2010) and Chairman of the Board 2010-2016.

Skills & Qualifications: Mr. Anderson brings to our Board his significant experience as a chief financial officer of two large multinational companies,in-depth knowledge with respect to the preparation and review of complex financial reporting statements, and experience in risk management and risk assessment.

LYNN D. BLEIL

LOGO

Director Since May 2015.2015

Age 55

Experience: Ms. Bleil was the leader of McKinsey & Company’sthe West Coast Healthcare Practice andof McKinsey & Company, a management consulting firm. Ms. Bleil was also a leader of McKinsey’s worldwide Healthcare Practice. She retired in November 2013 as a Senior Partner (Director) in the Southern California Office of McKinsey. During her more than 25 years with McKinsey, she worked exclusively within the healthcare sector, advising senior management and boards of leading companies on corporate and business unit strategy, mergers and acquisitions and integration, marketing and sales, public policy and organization. Ms. Bleil also serves as a director of Amicus Therapeutics Inc., a biotechnology company, Alcon AG, Sonova Holdings AG, a global leader in hearing aids and cochlear implants, and Intermountain Healthcare’s Park City Medical Center, anon-profit healthcare organization. She was formerly a director of DST Systems, Inc., a financial and health services information technology company, Sonova Holding AG, and Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (sold to Teva in May 2015).

Skills & Qualifications: Ms. Bleil holds a B.S.E. degreebrings to the Board significant experience in Chemical Engineering from Princeton Universitythe healthcare industry, as well as commercial expertise and an M.B.A. degree from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.expertise in corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions, and financial reporting, compliance and risk management.

14Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Nominees for Director

THOMAS F. CHEN

 

Thomas D. Brown has served as a director since

LOGO

Director Since May 2008. From 1974 until his retirement in 2002, Mr. Brown held various sales, marketing and management positions at Abbott Laboratories, where he served as a senior vice president and president of the diagnostics division from 1998 to 2002 and as corporate vice president for worldwide commercial operations from 1993 to 1998. He is a director of Quidel Corporation and Cepheid, a molecular diagnostics company, and formerly served as a director of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Mr. Brown received a B.A. degree from the State University of New York at Buffalo.2014

Age 69

Thomas F. Chen has served as a director since May 2014.Experience: Mr. Chen served as senior vice president and president of international nutrition of Abbott Laboratories before retiring in 2010. During his22-year career at Abbott, Mr. Chen served in a number of roles with expandedexpanding responsibilities, primarily in Pacific/Asia/Africa where he oversaw expansion into a number of emerging markets. Prior to Abbott, he held several management positions at American Cyanamid Company, which later merged with Pfizer. He isPfizer, Inc. Mr. Chen currently serves as a director of Baxter International Inc. and formerlyan advisor to Cooperation Fund, a partnership between Goldman Sachs and the sovereign fund, China Investment Corporation, to bolster U.S. manufacturers’ market presence in China. Mr. Chen previously served as a director of Cyanotech Corporation.

Skills & Qualifications: With his extensive international business experience in pharmaceutical, hospital products and nutritionals through his22-year career at Abbott, Mr. Chen receivedprovides our Board with a Bachelor’s degree in International Businessdistinct global perspective resulting from National Cheng Chi University in Taipei, Taiwan,his experience with diverse geographies and an M.B.A. degree from Indiana University.healthcare products. He also provides our Board with significant operational, strategy, mergers and acquisitions, healthcare industry, governmental and regulatory, and commercial expertise.

J. JOEL HACKNEY, JR.

 

LOGO

Director Since March 2019

Age 49

Experience: Mr. Hackney has been the Chief Executive Officer and a director of nThrive, Inc., a revenue cycle management company providing medical billing and coding, business analytics and advisory services, since January 2016. Previously, he was the Chief Executive Officer and a director of AVINTV from June 2013 to November 2016.

Skills & Qualifications: With more than 25 years of experience leading both private and public companies domestically and abroad, Mr. Hackney brings to our Board deep expertise in driving business transformation and profitable growth.

Rod F. DammeyerVERONICA M. HAGEN

LOGO

Director Since June 2018

Age 73

Experience: From 2007 until her retirement in 2013, Ms. Hagen served as Chief Executive Officer of Polymer Group, Inc. and served from 2007 to 2015 as a Director. She also served as President of Polymer Group, Inc. from January 2011 until her retirement in 2013. Prior to joining Polymer Group, Inc., Ms. Hagen was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Sappi Fine Paper, a division of Sappi Limited. She has served as Vice President and Chief Customer Officer at Alcoa Inc. and owned and operated Metal Sales Associates. She is a Director of American Water Works Company, Inc., Newmont Mining Corporation and The Southern Company.

Skills & Qualifications: Ms. Hagen brings business transformation expertise, senior leadership experience, corporate governance knowledge and experience, environmental matters experience and risk management experience. Ms. Hagen’s experience as chief executive officer of two global companies allows her to contribute key valuable insights to our Board regarding operations management, customer service and strategic planning.

STEPHEN C. HOOLEY

LOGO

Director Since March 2019

Age 56

Experience: Mr. Hooley served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of DST Systems, Inc. from July 2014 to April 2018. He was Chief Executive Officer and President of DST Systems from September 2012 to July 2014 and President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2009 to September 2012. He was previously the President and Chief Executive Officer of Boston Financial Data Services.

Skills & Qualifications: Mr. Hooley brings previous service as a public company chief executive officer and director, since January 1998. He isdeep experience in the chairman of CAC, LLC, a private company providing capital investment and management advisoryfinancial services and is the former vice chairman ofhealthcare industries and extensive business transformation and strategy expertise.

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 915


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Nominees for Director

KAY G. PRIESTLY

 

Anixter International,

LOGO

Director Since June 2018

Age 62

Experience:Ms. Priestly served as Chief Executive Officer of Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. from May 2012 until her retirement in December 2014. She previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Rio Tinto Copper, a division of the Rio Tinto Group, from 2008 until her appointment as Chief Executive Officer of Turquoise Hill Resources in 2012. From 2006 to 2008, she was Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Rio Tinto’s Kennecott Utah Copper operations. She previously spent over 24 years with global professional services firm Arthur Anderson, where he served from 1985 until February 2001,she provided tax, consulting and the former managing partner of corporate investments of Equity Group Investments, L.L.C., where he served from 1995 until June 2000. Mr. Dammeyer serves asM&A services to global companies across many industries. She is a director of Quidel Corporation, a developer and manufacturer of point-of-care diagnostic tests, and was an independent trustee of various Invesco funds through December 2015,TechnipFMC plc and formerly served as a director of Ventana Medical Systems,New Gold Inc. prior, FMC Technologies, Inc. SouthGobi Resources Ltd., Turquoise Hill Resources and Stone Energy Corporation(1).

Skills & Qualifications: Ms. Priestly brings to its being acquired in February 2008 andour Board extensive executive management experience as a directorchief executive offer and senior officer of The Scripps Research Institute. Mr. Dammeyer received a B.S. degree inmajor organizations with international operations. She also brings substantial business transformation, accounting, from Kent State University.financial, risk management, M&A and consulting expertise.

 

(1)

When the Board appointed Ms. Priestly as a director in June 2018, it was aware that Stone Energy Corporation had filed for bankruptcy protection in 2016 while Ms. Priestly was serving as a director. The Board concluded that this event did not impair Ms. Priestley’s ability to serve as one of our directors.

William K. Hall has served as a director since August 2006. He is a private equity investor who served from 2000 to 2009 as chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Procyon Technologies, Inc., a privately owned holding company. From 1994 to 2000, Mr. Hall was chairman and chief executive officer of Falcon Building Products, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of residential and commercial construction and home improvement products. He serves as a director of W.W. Grainger, a supplier of facilities maintenance products, as a director of Real Industry, Inc., a diversified metals company, and as a trustee of the Rush University Medical Center, and formerly served as a director of Actuant Corporation, a diversified industrial products manufacturer. Mr. Hall received a B.S.E. degree in aeronautical engineering, a M.S. degree in mathematical statistics, and M.B.A. and Ph.D. degrees in business from the University of Michigan.MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI

 

John Patience has served as a director since our incorporation in March 1989. He is a co-founder and partner of Crabtree Partners LLC, a private investment firm in Lake Forest, Illinois, which was formed in June 1995. He is currently the chairman of the board and a director of Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc., a developer of automated diagnostics systems. He formerly served as a director and vice chairman of the board of directors of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a public company prior to its being acquired in February 2008. From January 1988 to March 1995, he was a general partner in a venture capital firm which he co-founded and which led our pre-IPO funding. He was previously a partner in the consulting firm of McKinsey & Company, specializing in health care. Mr. Patience received B.A. and LL.B. degrees from the University of Sydney in Sydney, Australia, and an M.B.A. degree from the Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania.

LOGO

Mike S. Zafirovski has served as a director sinceDirector Since November 2012.2012

Age 65

Experience: Mr. Zafirovski is the founder and presidentPresident of The Zaf Group LLC, a management consulting and investment firm established in November 2012. Mr. Zafirovski has also served as an executive advisor to The Blackstone Group, a private investment banking company, since October 2011. From November 2005 to August 2009, Mr. Zafirovski served as the presidentPresident and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and a director of Nortel Networks Corporation. Prior to that, he was the presidentPresident and chief operating officerChief Operating Officer and a director of Motorola, Inc. from July 2002 to January 2005, and remained a consultant to and a director of Motorola until May 2005. He served as executive vice presidentExecutive Vice President and presidentPresident of the personal communications sector of Motorola from June 2000 to July 2002. Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Zafirovski spent nearly 25 years with General Electric Company, where he served in management positions, including 13 years as presidentPresident and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of five businesses in the consumer, industrial and financial services areas, his most recent being presidentPresident and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of GE Lighting from July 1999 to May 2000. Mr. Zafirovski also serves as a director of The Boeing Company and two private companies (ApriaApria Healthcare Group Inc.

Skills & Qualifications: Mr. Zafirovski provides guidance to the Board on a wide variety of strategic, operational and non-executive chairmanbusiness matters based on his substantial experience leading enterprises with significant international operations. He also provides business transformation, information technology, mergers and acquisitions, healthcare industry, and government and regulatory expertise.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FORthe board for DJO Global, Inc.). He receivedelection of these ten Director nominees. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a B.A. degree in mathematics from Edinboro University in Pennsylvania.different choice.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONSDirector Qualifications

 

We believe that our 10ten director nominees possess the experience, qualifications and skills that warrant their election as directors. Our directors have in common, among other qualities, a breadth of business experience, seasoned judgment and an insistence on looking beyond the next quarter or the next year in directing and supporting our management. From their service on the boards of other public and private companies, our directors also bring to us the insights that they gain from the operating policies, governance structures and growth dynamics of these other companies.

The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to ensure an experienced, exceptionally qualified Board with deep expertise in areas relevant to Stericycle. When evaluating

potential director nominees, the committee considers each individual’s professional expertise and background, in addition to his or her personal characteristics. The committee always conducts this evaluation in the context of the Board as a whole. The committee works with the Board to determine the appropriate mix of backgrounds and experiences that will foster and maintain a Board strong in its collective knowledge and best able to perpetuate our long-term success. To assist in this objective, the Nominating and Governance Committee conducts annual evaluations of the Board and the Board’s committees, assessing the experience, skills, qualifications, diversity, and contributions of each individual and of the group as a whole.

 

2016Proxy Statement16  Stericycle, Inc. • 10 - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Director Qualifications

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly communicates with the Board to identify characteristics, professional experience and areas of expertise that will help meet specific Board needs, including:

leadership experience, as directors who have served in significant leadership positions possess strong abilities to motivate and manage others and to identify and develop leadership qualities in others;

business transformation experience, as we are engaged in a multi-year program to transform our company for long-term sustainability and drive profitable growth and long-term shareholder returns;

public company board service and governance expertise, which provides directors with a solid understanding of their extensive and complex oversight responsibilities and

furthers our goals of greater transparency, accountability for management and the Board and protection of stockholder interests;

operational expertise, which gives directors specific insight into, and expertise that will foster active participation in the oversight of the development and implementation of our operating plan and business strategy;

financial reporting,compliance and risk management expertise, which enables directors to analyze our financial statements, capital structure and complex financial transactions and oversee our accounting, financial reporting and enterprise risk management; and

healthcare industry expertise, which is vital in understanding and reviewing our strategy.

 

Our directors individually bring toThe following table highlights each nominee’s specific skills, knowledge and experiences in these areas. A particular director may possess additional skills, knowledge or experience even though they are not indicated below:

   Anderson Bleil Chen Hackney Hagen Hooley Miller Murley Priestly Zafirovski

Leadership experience (public company CEO/COO)

          

Public company Board service/governance expertise

          

Operational expertise (logistics/supply chain or capital intensive industry)

          

Business transformation/IT expertise

          

Corporate strategy/M&A capability

          

Financial reporting, compliance and risk management expertise

          

Healthcare industry expertise

          

Government/regulatory experience

          

Talent management/HR expertise

          

Commercial/go-to-market expertise

          

International business expertise

          

Gender, ethnic or other diversity

          

Tenure on Board (years, as of May 2019)

 

2

 

4

 

5

 

<1

 

1

 

<1

 

<1

 

2

 

1

 

7

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement17


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Committees of the Board a wide range of experience, backgrounds and knowledge. Among other things that each of our directors brings: Mr. Miller brings a wealth of knowledge of our industry; Mr. Schuler brings experience managing the operations of a multinational healthcare company and knowledge of the dynamics of the healthcare industry; Mr. Alutto brings experience in sales and marketing, operations, and general management of our industry; Ms. Bleil brings significant expertise in the healthcare industry; Mr. Brown brings experience managing the operations of a multinational diagnostics business; Mr. Chen brings experience in managing and expanding the operations of a multinational nutrition business in Asia and emerging markets; Mr. Dammeyer brings experience in a very wide range of businesses; Mr. Hall brings experience in developing, managing and expanding global manufacturing companies; Mr. Patience brings experience with public and private healthcare companies; and Mr. Zafirovski brings experience managing the operations of multinational communications and technology companies.

When the Board elected Mr. Zafirovski as a director in November 2012, it was aware that Nortel Networks Corporation had filed for bankruptcy protection in January 2009 while Mr. Zafirovski was serving as its president and chief executive officer and a director. The Board concluded that this event did not impair Mr. Zafirovski’s ability to serve as one of the Company’s directors.

 

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARDCommittees of the Board

Our Board of Directors has three standing committees: Compensation, Audit, and Nominating and Governance Committees. All of the members of each committee are outside directors who are independent under the applicable NASDAQSEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards.

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee makes recommendationsdetermines the structure, award and public disclosure of all elements of compensation and benefits paid to our CEO and other executive officers. The committee reviews and approves financial and strategic performance objectives with respect to our annual and long-term incentive plans. The committee reviews and approves the respective salaries of the Company’s executive officers in light of the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to each officer, including, as the committee deems appropriate, consideration of (i) the individual officer’s salary grade, scope of responsibilities and level of experience, (ii) the rate of inflation, (iii) the range of salary increases for the Company’s employees generally, and (iv) the salaries paid to comparable officers in comparable companies. The committee determines appropriate cash bonuses, if any, for the Company’s executive

officers, after consideration of specific individual and Company performance goals and criteria and periodically reviews the aggregate amount of compensation and benefits being paid or potentially payable to the Board of Directors concerning the base salaries and cash bonuses of ourCompany’s executive officers and reviews our employee compensation policies generally.officers. The committee also administershas responsibility for overseeing the Company’s regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters. Pursuant to the committee’s charter, the committee has responsibility for facilitating a risk review of incentive compensation programs and assessing if those incentives create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our stock option plans as they apply to our executive officers. In addition,company. At the request of the Board, the committee periodically reviews our compensation practicesexecutive leadership development and CEO succession planning and makes recommendations to evaluate whether they pose enterprise or other risks to us.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of our financial statements, the qualifications and experience of our independent accountants, the performance of our internal audit function and our independent accountants, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee reviews our risk management policies and practices and reports any significant issues to the Board. Matters of risk management are brought to the committee’s attention by our Chief Financial Officer, our General Counsel or by our principal internal auditor who focuses on potential weaknesses that could result in a failure of an internal control process. Our management reviews and reports on potential areas of risk at the committee’s request or at the request of other members of the Board.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and evaluates possible nominees for election to the Board of Directors and recommends to the Board a slate of nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders. The committee also recommends to the Board director assignments to the Board’s committees. In addition, the committee develops, recommends to the Board and oversees the implementation of our corporate governance policies and practices.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 11


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a variety of factors in evaluating a candidate for selection as a nominee for election as a director. These factors include the candidate’s personal qualities, with a particular emphasis on probity, independence of judgment and analytical skills, and the candidate’s professional experience, educational background, knowledge of our business and healthcare services generally and experience serving on the boards of other public companies. In evaluating a candidate’s qualification for election to the Board, the committee also considers whether and how the candidate would contribute to the Board’s diversity, which we define broadly to include gender and ethnicity as well as background, experience and other individual qualities and attributes. The committee has not established any minimum qualifications that a candidate must possess. In determining whether to recommend an incumbent director for re-election, the committee also considers the director’s preparation for and participation in meetings of the Board of Directors and the committee or committees of the Board on which the director serves.

In identifying potential candidates for selection in the future as nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on suggestions and recommendations from the other directors, management, stockholders and others and, when appropriate, may retain a search firm for assistance. The committee will consider candidates proposed by stockholders and will evaluate any candidate proposed by a stockholder on the same basis that it evaluates any other candidate. Any stockholder who wants to propose a candidate should submit a written recommendation to the committee indicating the candidate’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information and providing preliminary confirmation that the candidate would be willing to serve as a director. Any such recommendation should be addressed to the Board of Directors, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.

In addition to recommending director candidates to the Nominating and Governance Committee, stockholders may also, pursuant to procedures established in our bylaws, directly nominate one or more director candidates to stand for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. A stockholder wishing to make such a nomination must deliver written notice of the nomination to the secretary of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. If, however, the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or after the first anniversary, the stockholder’s notice must be received no later than the close of business on the 90th day, and no earlier than the 120th day, prior to the annual meeting.

In accordance with a recent amendment to our bylaws, stockholders may now also submit director nominees to the Board to be included in our annual proxy statement, known as “proxy access.” Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the Company not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date that the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the annual meeting of the previous year.

Committee Charters

The charters of the Compensation, Audit, and Nominating and Governance Committees are available on our website,www.stericycle.com.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 12


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Committee Members and Meetings

The following table provides information about the membership of the committees of the Board of Directors.

 

DirectorCompensation
Committee
Audit
Committee
Nominating and
Governance
Committee

Mark C. Miller

Jack W. Schuler

x*

Charles A. Alutto

Lynn D. Bleil

x  

Thomas D. Brown

x  

Thomas F. Chen

x  

Rod F. Dammeyer(1)

x*x  

William K. Hall

x*

John Patience

x  x  

Mike S. Zafirovski

x  
  *Committee Chair

(1)The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Dammeyer, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the applicable rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our Board of Directors held eight meetings in person during 2015 and acted without a formal meeting on a number of occasions by the unanimous written consent of the directors. The Audit Committee held eight meetings during the year. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during the year. The Nominating and Governance Committee held three meetings during the year. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and the total number of meetings of all Board committees on which he or she served during his or her term of service.

We encourage our directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All of the nominees for election as directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and we anticipate that all of our directors will attend this year’s Annual Meeting.

LEAD DIRECTOR

We amended our bylaws in August 2008 and November 2012 to require the Board of Directors to appoint one of our outside directors as the Lead Director if and when our president and chief executive, or any other officer or employee, is serving as the Executive Chairman of the Board. The Lead Director is required to be independent under the NASDAQ listing standards, and serves at the Board’s pleasure until the next election of directors by the stockholders.

Working with the Executive Chairman of the Board, the Lead Director is responsible for coordinating the scheduling and agenda of Board meetings and the preparation and distribution of agenda materials. The Lead Director presides when the Board meets in executive session or in the absence of the Executive Chairman of the Board and may call special meetings of the Board when he considers appropriate. In general, the Lead Director oversees the scope, quality and timeliness of the flow of information from our management to the Board and serves as an independent point of contact for stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board other than through the Executive Chairman of the Board.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 13


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

In August 2008, our Chairman of the Board, Jack W. Schuler, resigned as Chairman after serving for more than 18 years, and our Board appointed Mr. Schuler as our Lead Director, and he still serves in this position. Also in August 2008, the Board appointed our then President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark C. Miller, who had served in these positions for more than 16 years, to the additional position of Chairman of the Board. Effective January 2013, Charles A. Alutto became our President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Miller assumed the position of Executive Chairman of the Board. At this time, the Board believes that the Executive Chairman arrangement, together with the Lead Director, serve the Company well. It is anticipated that Mr. Miller will transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman during 2016 and that Mr. Schuler will continue as Lead Director following that transition. The combined experience and knowledge of Messrs. Alutto, Miller and Schuler in their respective roles of Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman and Lead Director provide the Board and the Company with continuity of leadership that has enabled the Company’s success with sufficient independent oversight of the Board through our Lead Director.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Executive Sessions of the Board

Our Board of Directors excuses Mr. Alutto, our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as any of our other executive officers who may be present by invitation, from a portion of each meeting of the Board in order to allow the Board, with our Lead Director presiding, to review Mr. Alutto’s performance as President and Chief Executive Officer and to enable each director to raise any matter of interest or concern without the presence of management.

Board Evaluation

Our directors annually review the performance of the Board of Directors and its committees and the performance of their fellow directors by completing confidential evaluation forms that are returned to Mr. Schuler as the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. At a subsequent meeting of the Board, Mr. Schuler leads a discussion with the full Board of any issues and suggestions for improvement identified in his review of these evaluation forms.

Policy on Related Party Transactions

The Board of Directors has adopted a written policy requiring certain transactions with related parties to be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. For purposes of this policy, a related party includes any director or executive officer or an immediate family member of any director or executive officer. The transactions subject to review include any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements and relationships) in which (i) we or one of our subsidiaries will be a participant, (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $100,000 and (iii) a related party will have a direct or indirect interest. In reviewing proposed transactions with related parties, the Audit Committee considers the benefits to us of the proposed transaction, the potential effect of the proposed transaction on the director’s independence (if the related party is a director), and the terms of the proposed transaction and whether those terms are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally. There were no such transactions since January 1, 2015 that required the Audit Committee’s approval.

Succession Planning

The Board of Directors annually reviews and approves our succession planning for our Chief Executive Officer, our other executive officers and a number of other officers.

Required Resignation on Change in Job Responsibilities

The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that a director must tender his resignation if the director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially from the position that he held when originally elected to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will then review the circumstances of the director’s

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 14


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

new position or retirement and recommend to the full Board whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation in light of the contribution that he can be expected to continue to make to the Board.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Our directors, executive officers and other designated employees are generally prohibited from engaging in certain transactions in respect of our common stock including certain hedging and derivative transactions and short sales. In addition, these persons are generally prohibited from holding our common stock in a margin account or otherwise pledging our common stock as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy

In order to encourage sound financial reporting and enhance individual accountability, we maintain a clawback policy that allows us to recover from our executive officers certain performance-based compensation in the event of certain accounting restatements. If we are required to prepare a restatement of our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Compensation Committee will seek to recover from a covered officer certain performance-based compensation if the covered officer is determined to have engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement or if otherwise required by applicable SEC or NASDAQ rules.

Risk Oversight

The Board regularly devotes time during its meetings to review and discuss the most significant risks facing the Company, and management’s responses to those risks. During these discussions, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and other members of senior management present management’s assessment of risks, a description of the most significant risks facing the Company and any mitigating factors and plans or practices in place to address and monitor those risks. In addition, the Board conducts an annual, in-depth review of the Company’s business, which includes detailed analysis and consideration of strategic, operational, financial, competitive, compliance and compensation risk areas.

Each Board committee addresses relevant risk topics as part of its committee responsibilities. The committees oversee the Company’s risk profile and exposures relating to matters within the scope of their authority and provide periodic reports to the full Board about their deliberations and recommendations. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and its overall compensation philosophy.

Responsibility for risk management flows to individuals and entities throughout our Company as described above, including our Board, Board committees and senior management. We believe our culture has facilitated, and will continue to facilitate, effective risk management across the Company.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Stockholders who would like to communicate with the Board may do so by writing to the Board of Directors, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. Our Investor Relations department will process all communications received. Communications relating to matters within the scope of the Board’s responsibilities will be forwarded to the Executive Chairman of the Board and at his direction to the other directors, and communications relating to ordinary day-to-day business matters that are not within the scope of the Board’s responsibilities will be forwarded to the appropriate officer or executive. Communications addressed to the Lead Director will be forwarded to him and at his direction to the other directors, and communications addressed to a particular committee of the Board will be forwarded to the chair of that committee and at his direction to the other members of the committee.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 15


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2015 relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to which stock option grants, restricted stock awards or other rights to acquire shares of our common stock may be made or issued:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category

  

Number of
Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options

(a)

   

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options

(b)

   

Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by our security holders(1)

   5,398,111    $92.11     3,317,483   

Equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders(2)

   8,143    $45.59     —   
(1)These plans consist of our 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2008 Incentive Stock Plan, 2005 Incentive Stock Plan, and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(2)The only plan in this category is our 2000 Non-statutory Stock Option Plan.

In 2000, our Board of Directors approved the 2000 Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”), which authorized the granting of non-statutory stock options for 7,000,000 shares of our common stock to employees (but not to officers or directors). The 2000 Plan expired in February 2010.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 16


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Audit Committee Report

Under the Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the qualifications and experience of Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, and the Company’s compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website,www.stericycle.com. The members of the Audit Committee who served during 2015 were Messrs. Dammeyer (Chairman), Chen and Patience and Ms. Bleil.

In regard to our role, we note that it is the responsibility of the Company’s management to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that it is the responsibility of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit those financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight, and we do not provide expert or other special assurance regarding the Company’s financial statements or the quality of the audits performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

In carrying out our oversight responsibility, we review and discuss with both management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, all quarterly and annual financial statements prior to their issuance. We reviewed and discussed with both management and Ernst & Young LLP the quarterly and annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Our reviews and discussions with Ernst & Young LLP included executive sessions without the presence of the Company’s management. They also included discussions of the matters required to be discussed pursuant to Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including, among other items, the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the Company’s financial statements. We also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP matters relating to their independence, including a review of their audit and non-audit fees and the letter and written disclosures that the Audit Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP pursuant to Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.

In addition, we continued to monitor the scope and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, including staffing levels and requirements, and we reviewed programs and initiatives to strengthen the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and steps taken to implement recommended improvements.

On the basis of these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee

 

Rod F. Dammeyer, Chairman

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of our financial statements, the qualifications and experience of our independent accountants, the performance of our internal audit function and our independent accountants, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Lynn D. BleilThe Audit Committee regularly reviews with the Company’s legal counsel any legal or regulatory matters that may have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements or operations. The Audit Committee also oversees, reviews and evaluates the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s compliance program. The Audit Committee reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent public accountants. The Audit Committee

also reviews the performance, effectiveness and objectivity of the Company’s internal audit function, including its staffing, audit plan, examinations and related management responses.

Thomas F. ChenThe Audit Committee reviews our risk management policies and practices and reports any significant issues to the Board. Matters of risk management are brought to the committee’s attention by our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, our Executive Vice President and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, or by our principal internal auditor. Our management reviews and reports on potential areas of risk at the committee’s request or at the request of other members of the Board.

John PatienceNominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee develops, recommends to the Board and oversees the implementation of our corporate governance policies and practices. The committee monitors ongoing legislative and regulatory changes and initiatives pertaining to corporate governance principles, SEC disclosure rules and Nasdaq listing rules. The committee identifies and evaluates possible nominees for election to the Board of Directors and recommends to the Board a slate of nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders. The committee also recommends to the Board director assignments to the Board’s committees.

As discussed above, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers a variety of factors in evaluating a candidate for selection as a nominee for election as a director. These factors include the candidate’s personal qualities, with a particular emphasis on probity, independence of judgment and analytical skills, and the candidate’s professional experience, educational background, knowledge of our business and healthcare services generally and experience serving on the boards of other public companies. In evaluating a candidate’s qualification for election to the Board, the committee also considers whether and how the candidate would contribute to

 

2016Proxy Statement18  Stericycle, Inc. • 17 - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Committees of the Board

 

Compensation Discussionthe Board’s diversity, which we define broadly to include gender and Analysisethnicity as well as background, experience and other individual qualities and attributes. The committee has not established any minimum qualifications that a candidate must possess. In determining whether to recommend an incumbent director forre-election, the committee also considers the director’s preparation for and participation in meetings of the Board of Directors and the committee or committees of the Board on which the director serves.

In identifying potential candidates for selection in the future as nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on suggestions and recommendations from the other directors, management, stockholders and others and, when appropriate, may retain a search firm for assistance. In February 2019, the Nominating and Governance Committee retained a leading third-party search firm to assist with identifying potential director nominees. The committee will consider candidates proposed by stockholders and will evaluate any candidate proposed by a stockholder on the same basis that it evaluates any other candidate. Any stockholder who wants to propose a candidate should submit a written recommendation to the committee indicating the candidate’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information and providing preliminary confirmation that the candidate would be willing to serve as a director. Any such recommendation should be addressed to the Board of Directors, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.

In addition to recommending director candidates to the Nominating and Governance Committee, stockholders may

also, pursuant to procedures established in our bylaws, directly nominate one or more director candidates to stand for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. A stockholder wishing to make such a nomination must deliver written notice of the nomination that satisfies the requirements set forth in our bylaws to the secretary of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. If, however, the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or after the first anniversary, the stockholder’s notice must be received no more than 120 days prior to such annual meeting nor less than the later of (x) 90 days prior to such annual meeting and (y) the close of business on the 10thday following the date on which notice or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was first given or made.

Stockholders may also submit director nominees to the Board to be included in our annual proxy statement, known as “proxy access.” Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the Company not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to theone-year anniversary of the date that the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the annual meeting of the previous year.

 

OVERVIEWProcess for Selecting Directors

 

 

Compensation Philosophy. Our compensation program for executive officers has two objectives:

LOGO

to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executive officers; andCommittee Charters

to structure their compensation, aside from their base salaries, to be dependent on the Company’s attainment of measurable Company-wide performance targets and the sustained growth in our stock price, so that they benefit only if our stockholders benefit.

 

The program consistscharters of cash compensationthe Compensation, Audit and long-term incentive compensation. Cash compensation is paid in the form of a base salaryNominating and an annual cash performance bonus, and long-term incentive compensation is paid in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs).

Performance-Oriented. Our compensation program is performance-oriented. We favor (i) annual cash performance bonuses and (ii) stock options and RSUs, both vesting in 20% annual increments over five years as the principal components of our executive officers’ compensation. Historically, annual cash performance bonuses have been paid to our executive officers based upon the achievement of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) targets developed from our annual operating plan and budget as approved by our Board of Directors. Beginning in 2016, we have added return on invested capital (ROIC) as a second performance metric in our annual bonus program. We believe that these two components provide strong incentives to our executive officers to improve our operating performance and the returnGovernance Committees are available on our capital investments, thereby creating value for all of our stockholders. In 2015, annual cash performance bonuses and stock options represented 81.3% of the total compensation of our named executive officers. As a result, a substantial portion of our executive officers’ compensation is impacted, both positively and negatively, by company performance and stockholder return.

Compensation Committee. Compensation decisions for our executive officers are made by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. All of the Committee’s members are independent under the applicable NASDAQ listing standards. The Committee’s decisions relating to base salaries and annual cash performance bonuses are subject to the review and approval of the full Board; the Committee’s decisions relating to stock options and RSUs are reviewed by the full Board but are not subject to its approval.

Compensation Consultant. In 2014, the Compensation Committee retained Deloitte Consulting LLP, an independent compensation consultant, to review our compensation philosophy and practices for our executive officers and the composition of our peer group of companies. Taking the results of the consultant’s review into consideration, in 2015 the Compensation Committee adjusted our compensation plans for our executive officers and refined our peer group of companies as described below. The Committee concluded that the annual cash salaries for our executive officers were below market as compared to our peer companies and implemented a four-year plan to increase base salaries to better align them with the peer group and the company’s stated compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee also modified the target levels for annual cash performance bonuses for our executive officers.

Compensation Goals for Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee takes into account a number of factors in setting the base salaries and annual cash performance bonus percentages for our executive officers and in determining the stock options and RSUs to be granted to them. In 2015, the Committee modified these compensation goals to target our executive officers’ total direct compensation (base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation) at the 50th to 60th percentile of our peer group.investor relations website,http://investors.stericycle.com.

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 18


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

For 2015, the peer group of companies consisted of Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Chemed Corporation, Cintas Corporation, Clean Harbors, Inc. Corrections Corporation of America, Covanta Holding Corporation, Ecolab Inc., Equifax, Inc., Healthcare Services Group, Inc., Iron Mountain Incorporated, J.B. Hunt Transportation Services, Inc., Paychex, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Rollins, Inc. and Waste Connections, Inc. The component companies in our survey may change from year to year as we continue to refine the list of surveyed companies for comparability to us in respect of factors like company size, performance, services offered, and industries served.

Base Salaries. During 2015, Mr. Alutto’s base salary was raised to $485,000, and the base salaries of the other named executive officers were raised to $340,000 for Messrs. Ginnetti and Arnold and to $335,000 for Mr. Collins. Mr. Miller’s base salary remained at $142,000. These salary adjustments were made during the first year of our four year plan to align executive base salaries with our peer group.

Annual Cash Performance Bonuses. Our annual cash performance bonus program is intended to provide a short-term cash incentive to our executive officers, for achieving our annual business plans. Each executive officer is eligible for an annual cash performance bonus equal to a specified percentage of his base salary. For 2015, the annual cash performance bonus percentages of our named executive officers were 125% for Mr. Alutto, 90% for Messrs. Ginnetti and Arnold, and 80% for Messrs. Collins and Mr. Miller. Using EBITDA as the performance metric in 2015, the Compensation Committee set target levels on the basis of the EBITDA in our final operating plan and budget for the year as approved by our Board of Directors, subject to any adjustments that the Compensation Committee considers appropriate to refine EBITDA as an internal measure of our operating performance. These target levels provide for potential annual cash performance bonuses increasing linearly from the 100% level (an annual cash performance bonus equal to the specified percentage of the executive officer’s base salary) to the 200% level (an annual cash performance bonus equal to 200% of the specified percentage of the executive officer’s base salary).

For 2015, our target EBITDA for the payment of annual cash performance bonuses at the 100% level was $808.0 million (compared to $707.6 million for 2014), and our target EBITDA for payment of annual cash performance bonuses at the maximum 200% level was $848.4 million (compared to $715.6 million for 2014 at the then-maximum 150% level). Our actual EBITDA for the year for purposes of the annual cash performance bonus program was $789.2 million (the sum of income from operations of $487.6 million plus $127.4 million of depreciation and amortization plus $174.4 million of acquisition-related expenses, restructuring costs, litigation expenses, and other items that the Compensation Committee did not consider part of our day-to-day operations).

Our executive officers received annual cash performance bonuses for 2015, paid in February 2016, equal to 76.75% of the annual cash performance bonus percentages of their base salaries. The annual cash performance bonuses for Messrs. Alutto, Ginnetti, Arnold, Collins and Miller were $465,327, $234,871, $234,871, $205,703, and $87,194, respectively.

Stock Option Grants. In 2015, we used stock options as the major component of the long term compensation of our executive officers because of the performance incentives that stock options provide. Our stock options are always granted at the closing price of our stock on the date of the grant, and thus the value to our executive officers of their stock options depends entirely on the subsequent growth in value of our stock. The executive officers’ stock options accordingly provide an incentive for sustained levels of superior performance that contribute to our overall success as reflected in the market price of our stock, to the benefit not just of our executive officers but all of our stockholders.

At the Compensation Committee’s meeting in February 2015, the Committee determined the annual stock option grants to our executive officers and to our employees generally taking into account (i) our operating performance, (ii) prior stock option grants, (iii) stock option grants and compensation practices at other companies with which members of the compensation committee were familiar and (iv) the goal of limiting stock

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 19


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Committees of the Board

 

option grants to executive officersCommittee Members and employees generally to no more than 10% of our fully-diluted shares over a trailing five-year period, thus averaging dilution of no more than 2% a year.

In 2015, the Committee granted stock options to our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Alutto, 110,000 shares; Messrs. Arnold and Ginnetti, each 45,000 shares; and Messrs. Collins and Miller, each 33,000 shares.

Bonus Conversion Program.We maintain a bonus conversion program for our executive officers and other management employees allowing them to convert all or a portion of their annual cash performance bonuses into stock options. The program is intended to enable our executive officers and other participants to trade current compensation for the possibility of greater rewards in the future if our stock performs well.

Under our bonus conversion program, a participant may irrevocably elect in advance of any annual cash performance bonus award to forgo some portion or all of any annual cash performance bonus otherwise payable to him or her and receive instead an immediately vested nonstatutory stock option under one of our stock option plans at an exercise price per share equal to the closing price of a share of our common stock on the bonus award date. The number of shares for which an option is granted is determined by dividing (i) five times the amount of the cash bonus that the participant elected to forgo by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock during the year for which the bonus is payable.

Four of our executive officers participated in this program in respect of their annual cash performance bonuses for 2015 payable in February 2016. Mr. Alutto elected to forgo $23,266 of his annual cash performance bonus and received instead an option for 1,007 shares, Mr. Arnold elected to forgo $11,744 of his annual cash performance bonus and received instead an option for 508 shares, Mr. Ginnetti elected to forgo $11,744 of his annual cash performance bonus and received instead an option for 508 shares and Mr. Miller elected to forgo his entire annual cash performance bonus and received instead an option for 3,773 shares. 

COMPENSATION DECISIONS

In addition to the guidelines previously described (see Overview—Compensation Goals for Executive Officers, on page 18), the Compensation Committee takes into account a number of other factors in setting the base salaries and annual cash performance bonus percentages of our executive officers and determining the stock options and RSUs to be granted to them. The Committee’s decisions are made with a view to reaching an overall result that, in the Committee’s subjective judgment, is appropriate and fair to the particular executive officer, both in absolute terms and relative to the compensation of the other executive officers, and fair as well to us and to our stockholders. The Committee does not reach this result in a mechanical fashion but, rather, considers each executive officer’s role and contribution to our performance, the officer’s compensation history and the compensation practices at other companies with which members of the Committee are familiar.

Compensation decisions are made at the regular meeting of the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of year, typically in February, when the results of our prior year’s performance are available and can be taken into account by the Committee in determining the executive officers’ annual cash performance bonuses for the prior year and their base salaries and annual cash performance bonus percentages for the current year. The Committee believes that incentives are likely to have a greater effect on performance the sooner they are communicated and accordingly determines annual cash performance bonus percentages and annual option grants as early in the year as practicable. The Committee’s decisions are made without regard to our anticipated earnings or other announcements.

Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee regarding the compensation of the our executive officers other than himself, but management does not otherwise participate in the Committee’s decisions. Compensation decisions for our Chief Executive Officer are made in executive session by the independent members of the Committee.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 20


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Committee reviews the results of the voting on each annual non-binding “say-on-pay” proposal. Last year, approximately 97% of our stockholders who voted on the “say-on-pay” proposal at the 2015 Annual Meeting approved our executive compensation as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and tabular disclosures in our proxy statement for the meeting. The Committee did not implement any changes in executive compensation during 2015 or 2016 as a direct result of the stockholders’ advisory vote.

BASE SALARIES

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee increased the base salary of Mr. Alutto to $585,000, increased the base salaries of Messrs. Arnold and Ginnetti to $380,000, and increased the base salary of Mr. Collins to $370,000. Mr. Miller’s base salary was reduced to $50,000 in connection with the anticipated transition of his role from Executive Chairman to Chairman during 2016. These salary adjustments were made consistent with our four year plan to adjust base salaries for our executive officers relative to our peer group as described above in Overview—Compensation Consultant.

ANNUAL CASH PERFORMANCE BONUSES

In February 2015, the Compensation Committee modified our annual cash performance bonus program. Prior to this modification, if we failed to attain our target EBITDA for payment of annual cash performance bonuses at the 100% level, our executive officers were not assured of any bonuses. In these circumstances, the Compensation Committee could decide in its discretion either that no annual cash performance bonuses were warranted or that it would be appropriate to award on the basis of individual merit cash bonuses of some order of magnitude smaller than the annual cash performance bonuses that would have been paid if we had attained our target EBITDA for payment of annual cash performance bonuses at the 100% level.

Beginning in February 2015, our annual cash performance bonus program now provides for a 50% payout(i.e., 50% of an executive officer’s bonus percentage of his base salary) if we attain at least 95% of our target EBITDA, with no annual cash performance bonus payouts at all if we fail to attain the 95% level.

The Compensation Committee also increased the performance level at which annual cash performance bonus payouts would be made at the maximum amount. Prior to this change, annual cash performance bonuses at the maximum 150% payout were payable if our actual EBITDA was equal to or exceeded an amount that, in practice, was less than 1.0% more than our target EBITDA. With the Committee’s change, annual cash performance bonus payouts at the maximum level are now payable only if our actual EBITDA is 105% of our target EBITDA, and the maximum annual cash performance bonus payout is increased to 200% if the 105% EBITDA level is exceeded.

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee added return on invested capital (ROIC) as a second metric in our annual cash performance bonus program. The ROIC component of the bonus program is structured to incentivize our executive officers to continue to achieve returns in excess of the company’s cost of capital. Achievement at the threshold level would result in a 50% payout, achievement at the target level would result in a 100% payout, and achievement at 112% of the target level would result in a 200% payout. For 2016, 75% of the annual cash performance bonus is tied to achievement of our EBITDA goal and 25% of the bonus is tied to achievement of our ROIC goal.

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee set the following annual cash performance bonus percentages for 2016 for each of our named executive officers: 150% for Mr. Alutto; 100% for Messrs. Arnold and Ginnetti; and 90% for Mr. Collins; and 50% for Mr. Miller.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 21


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

STOCK OPTIONS

The exercise price per share of an option granted under one of our stock option plans may not be less than the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of the option grant. The maximum term of an option may not exceed 10 years, and an option may be exercised only when it is vested and only while the executive officer or other employee remains an employee of ours and for a limited period following the termination of his or her employment.

Options granted to executive officers and employees generally vest over five years at the rate of one-fifth of the option shares on each of the first five anniversaries of the option grant date. (As noted below, options granted under our bonus conversion program are immediately vested.) Options also become exercisable upon the option holder’s death or upon a “change in control.”

In February 2016, the Committee determined the annual stock option grants to our executive officers and to our employees generally. The Committee granted options to our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Alutto, 105,406 shares; Messrs. Arnold and Ginnetti, each 44,595 shares; Mr. Collins 30,811 shares; and Mr. Miller 20,271 shares.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

Based on a review of market practices and with input from its consultant, in 2016 the Compensation Committee decided to add RSU awards to the long-term incentive component of our execution compensation program, allocating annual equity awards to our executive officers in 75% stock options and 25% RSUs. The number of RSUs awarded is determined on the basis of a target grant date fair value of total equity awards with RSUs being granted at a conversion ratio of one RSU for every 5 stock options replaced. RSUs granted to executive officers and employees generally vest over five years at the rate of one-fifth of the RSU shares on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date. RSUs also become fully vested and released upon the RSU holder’s death or upon a “change in control.”

In February 2016, the Committee determined the annual RSU grants to our named executive officers and to our employees generally. The Committee granted RSU awards to our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Alutto, 7,027 shares; Messrs. Arnold and Ginnetti, each 2,972 shares; Mr. Collins 2,054 shares; and Mr. Miller 1,351 shares.

RETIREMENT PLANS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Aside from our employee stock purchase plan and 401(k) plan, we do not maintain any other qualified plans (for example, a qualified defined benefit or a money purchase pension plan), and we have not adopted any nonqualified retirement or deferred compensation plan or arrangement.

PERQUISITES AND PERSONAL BENEFITS

We do not provide any perquisites or personal benefits to our executive officers.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We have not entered into written employment agreements with any of our named executive officers. All of our executive officers have entered into confidentiality, nonsolicitation and noncompetition agreements with us.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 22


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TERMINATION AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL PAYMENTS

We have not entered into salary continuation, severance or similar agreements or arrangements with any of our named executive officers and have no contractual or other obligation to provide severance benefits or other payments to them in the event of a change in control or termination of employment. (In this regard, however, we note that all of our stock option plans provide for the full vesting upon a change in control of all unvested options held by our employees, including our executive officers.)

STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS

All of our executive officers are required to hold a minimum position in our stock. An executive officer with less than five years of service as an executive officer must have a position equal to three times his or her base salary, and an executive officer with five or more years of service must have a position equal to five times his or her base salary.

An executive officer’s stock ownership position is measured by the value of our common stock that he or she owns directly and indirectly, the value of the vested and unvested RSUs that he or she holds, and the in-the-money value of the vested and unvested stock options that he or she holds. An executive officer who does not satisfy the applicable minimum stock ownership requirement may not sell any shares of our stock, with the exception that the officer may engage in a cashless exercise of an option and sell a number of shares sufficient to pay the exercise price of the option shares and the related withholding taxes. An executive officer who satisfies the applicable minimum stock ownership requirement may not sell any shares if, as a result, he or she would then violate the applicable minimum stock ownership requirement. All of our named executive officers satisfy the applicable minimum stock ownership requirement.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 23


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s executive management. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

William K. Hall, Chairman

Thomas D. Brown

Mike S. Zafirovski

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 24


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Meetings

 

The following table provides information about the compensation paidcurrent membership of the committees of the Board of Directors.

 Director

Compensation
Committee
Audit
Committee
Nominating and
Governance
Committee

Robert S. Murley(1)

Charles A. Alutto

Brian P. Anderson(2)

LOGO

Lynn D. Bleil

LOGO

LOGO

Thomas D. Brown(3)

LOGO

LOGO

Thomas F. Chen

LOGO

LOGO

J. Joel Hackney, Jr.

LOGO

Veronica M. Hagen

LOGO

Stephen C. Hooley

LOGO

Cindy J. Miller

Mark C. Miller

Kay G. Priestly(2)

LOGO

Mike S. Zafirovski(3)

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Member

LOGO

Committee Chair

(1)

Mr. Murley serves as the independent Chairman of the Board.

(2)

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Anderson, the Chair of the Audit Committee, and Ms. Priestly are “audit committee financial experts” as defined in the applicable SEC rules.

(3)

Mr. Brown is not standing forre-election at the Annual Meeting, and we expect that Mr. Zafirovski will succeed him as Chair of the Compensation Committee at that time.

Our Board of Directors held 18 meetings in person or earnedby telephone during 2018 and acted without a formal meeting on several occasions by the unanimous written consent of the directors. The Audit Committee held 15 meetings during the year. The Compensation Committee held six meetings during the year. The Nominating and Governance Committee held six meetings during the year. Each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of Board meetings and the total number of meetings of all Board committees on which he or she served during his or her term of service.

We encourage our directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Each of the director nominees attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and we anticipate that all of our director nominees will attend this year’s Annual Meeting.

Board Leadership

Our Company’s Board of Directors does not have a current requirement that the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board be either combined or separated because the Board believes it is in the best interest of our Company to make this determination based upon the position and direction of the Company and the constitution of the Board and management team. The Board regularly evaluates whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board should be combined or separated.

As part of the evolution of the Board of Directors, in March 2018, Mr. Murley, one of our independent directors, was elected Chairman of the Board, succeeding Mr. Miller. Mr. Miller is not standing forre-election as a director at the Annual Meeting.

The Chairman confers with our CEO on matters of general policy affecting theday-to-day management of our company’s business. The Chairman coordinates the scheduling and agenda of Board meetings and the preparation and distribution of agenda materials. The Chairman presides at all meetings of the Board of Directors and may call special meetings of the Board when he considers it appropriate. In general, the Chairman oversees the scope, quality, and timeliness of the flow of

20Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Board Leadership

information from our management to the Board and serves as an independent contact for stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board.

Our Board believes that an independent Chairman serves the Company and its stockholders well at this time. The combined experience and knowledge of Ms. Miller and Mr. Murley in their respective roles as CEO Elect and Chairman provide the Board and the Company with aday-to-day focus on the operations of the Company combined with independent oversight of the Board and management. Ournon-management directors further facilitate the Board’s independence by meeting frequently as a group and fostering a climate of transparent communication. A high level of contact between our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer between Board meetings also serves to foster effective Board leadership.

Corporate Governance

Executive Sessions of the Board

Our Board of Directors excuses our Chief Executive Officer, as well as any of our other executive officers who may be present by invitation, from a portion of each meeting of the Board in order to allow the Board, with our Chairman

presiding, to review the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and to enable each director to raise any matter of interest or concern without the presence of management.

Board Evaluation

Our directors annually review the performance of the Board of Directors and its committees and the performance of their fellow directors by completing a confidential evaluation that is returned to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The evaluations elicit input from our directors with respect to the Company’s vision, strategy, and operating performance, our CEO and senior management, and the composition and management of our Board and its committees. The evaluations also seek input from members of the Board committees in such areas as trends and issues affecting the Company, the roles and responsibilities of the committee members, the makeup and composition of the committees, participation and preparation of the committee members and the effectiveness of the committees. Each director also has the opportunity to provide confidential feedback on each other director. At a subsequent meeting of the Board, the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee leads a discussion with the full Board of any issues and suggestions for improvement identified in the review of the director evaluations.

LOGO  

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement21


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Corporate Governance

Policy on Related Party Transactions

The Board of Directors has adopted a written policy requiring certain transactions with related parties to be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. For purposes of this policy, a related party includes any director, director nominee or executive officer or an immediate family member of any director, director nominee or executive officer. The transactions subject to review include any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements and relationships) in which (i) we or one of our subsidiaries will be a participant, (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $100,000 and (iii) a

related party will have a direct or indirect interest. In reviewing proposed transactions with related parties, the Audit Committee considers the benefits to us of the proposed transaction, the potential effect of the proposed transaction on the director’s independence (if the related party is a director), and the terms of the proposed transaction and whether those terms are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally. There were no such transactions during the year ended December 31, 2018 that required the Audit Committee’s approval.

Succession Planning

The strength of our leadership team is critical to our Company’s short and long-term success. As such, the recruitment, development and retention of talented executives and senior leaders is a priority for the Company and the Board.

On an annual basis, the Board devotes time during a dedicated session to discuss talent management and succession planning. Lead by our Chief People Officer, this session includes an overview of senior leaders across the Company’s service lines, global markets, and functional shared services up to and including the executive officers of the company. The Board is also given exposure to emerging, high-potential leaders through formal presentations to the Board and working groups with Board committees.

Beyond the annual succession planning session, the Board is routinely updated on workforce matters including key workforce indicators, team member engagement, recruiting programs, and talent development programs.

During 2018, Stericycle announced the appointment of Ms. Miller as President and Chief Operating Officer. The Board was heavily engaged in the recruitment and selection process for this role and leveraged the appointment of a new Chief Operating Officer to build a succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer role. With the announcement of Mr. Alutto’s retirement in February 2019, Ms. Miller was named Chief Executive Officer, effective May 2, 2019.

Shareholder Engagement

During 2018 and under the oversight of our Chairman of the Board, Stericycle expanded its efforts for engaging with shareholders. In addition to our Company’s previous monitoring and routine shareholder engagement practices, we introduced a proactive Board outreach program which focused on building relationships with our top 25 shareholders.

Our expanded engagement program included outreach during the spring of 2018 and again in the fall to gain a broader understanding of shareholder priorities. During these conversations, our Board members reviewed our corporate governance enhancements, the refreshment of our

Board of Directors, our executive compensation philosophy and program, and the expansion of the leadership team, which have all significantly evolved over the past three years. Additionally, we solicited feedback from shareholders on our progress and responded to their questions and concerns.

The outreach program provided our Board with useful input from our shareholders. Transparency and responsiveness is an important component of our governance commitment to shareholders. We expect to continue to expand our engagement practices in order to monitor the insights of our shareholders and proactively solicit ways to evolve our business.

Risk Oversight

The Board regularly devotes time during its meetings to review and discuss the most significant risks facing the Company, and management’s responses to those risks. During these discussions, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and other members of senior management present management’s assessment of risks, a description of the most significant risks facing the

Company and any mitigating factors and plans or practices in place to address and monitor those risks.

Each Board committee addresses relevant risk topics as part of its committee responsibilities. The committees oversee the Company’s risk profile and exposures relating to matters within the scope of their authority and provide periodic

22Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Corporate Governance

reports to the full Board about their deliberations and recommendations. The Audit Committee reviews with management significant risks and exposures identified by management, our internal audit staff or the independent accountants, and management’s steps to address these risks. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and its overall compensation philosophy.

Responsibility for risk management flows to individuals and entities throughout our Company as described above, including our Board, Board committees and senior management. We believe our culture has facilitated, and will continue to facilitate, effective risk management across the Company.

Required Resignation on Change in Job Responsibilities

The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that a director must tender his or her resignation if the director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially from the position that he or she held when originally elected to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee

will then review the circumstances of the director’s new position or retirement and recommend to the full Board whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation in light of the contributions that he or she can be expected to continue to make to the Board.

Director Tenure

In order to assist with Board refreshment and in bringing fresh ideas and perspectives to the Board, in March 2019, the Board revised our Corporate Governance Guidelines with respect to director tenure. The revised Guidelines generally provide that nonon-management Director may be

nominated to serve a new term if he or she has already served on the Board for 15 years at the time of election. The Board of Directors may make exceptions to this policy on acase-by-case basis.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Our directors, executive officers and other designated employees are prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with respect to our common stock including hedging transactions, derivative transactions and short sales. In addition, executive officers and other designated employees are prohibited from holding our common stock in

a margin account or otherwise pledging our common stock as collateral for a loan. In March 2019, our Board amended our policy to also prohibit our directors from holding our common stock in a margin account or otherwise pledging our common stock as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy

In order to encourage sound financial reporting and enhance individual accountability, we have adopted a clawback policy that allows us to recover from our executive officers certain performance-based compensation in the event of certain accounting restatements. If we are required to prepare a restatement of our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement

under the securities laws, the Compensation Committee may seek to recover from a covered officer certain performance-based compensation if the covered officer is determined to have engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement or if otherwise required by applicable SEC or Nasdaq rules.

10b5-1 Trading Plan Guidelines

In March 2019, our Board adopted guidelines with respect to trading plans(“10b5-1 Plans”) adopted by employees or directors pursuant to Rule10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“10b5-1 Plan Guidelines”). These10b5-1 Plan Guidelines are in addition to the requirements and conditions of applicable law and other Company policies, including our Securities Trading Policy. The10b5-1 Plan Guidelines require that10b5-1 Plans be approved by our General Counsel or his designee and that

they only be adopted or amended while a trading blackout is not in effect. The10b5-1 Plan Guidelines provide for a “cooling off” period 2013-2015of at least 30 days before trades can occur after adoption or amendment of a10b5-1 Plan and before adoption of a new plan after early termination of an existing10b5-1 Plan. Our10b5-1 Plan Guidelines also set restrictions on the number of10b5-1 Plans a covered individual may have in effect, trading outside of an existing10b5-1 Plan and the length of time a plan may be in effect.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement23


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Corporate Governance

Internal Controls

Under the oversight of the Audit Committee, we have implemented an Internal Control Transformation Program to

address historical material weaknesses. We highlight below significant remediation activities undertaken in 2018.

Financial Reporting Controls:

In connection with our Internal Control Transformation Program, we have continued to focus on improving our overall control environment. Our remediation actions related to improving the controls over our financial statement preparation and reporting process included the following:

The Audit Committee and our company’s management have frequent communications regarding our financial reporting and internal control environment.

We expanded our finance, accounting and information technology teams through the addition of experienced and qualified personnel.

We aligned incentive plans with sustained effective internal controls over financial reporting and management continuous control monitoring.

Our company provided additional internal controls training to our employees and standardized policies and controls where feasible.

Were-designed and harmonized our control objectives across all processes and locations.

Were-designed and enhanced our delegation of authority policy and processes, including implementing a systematic enabled work flow.

Our company implemented a central repository for policies and quarterly checklists to confirm adherence with policies.

We instituted monthly legal entity and management reporting reviews of financial statements disaggregated by key business units, regions and functional areas, to evaluate results, observe adherence to policies and agree on necessary actions to be taken before considering the period closed. Management of the respective areas meets with our corporate executives monthly in connection with these reviews.

We expanded our technical accounting group that has responsibility to ensure that the accounting for complex ornon-routine transactions is appropriate.

We expanded our use of specialists to assist with highly complex and technical areas of accounting, valuation and new accounting standards adoption.

We enhanced our Disclosure Committee processes and reviews by adding experienced and knowledgeable members to the committee and implementing disclosure surveys to capture input from appropriate areas and levels throughout the organization.

General Information Technology Controls (GITCs):

During the course of 2018, we made progress in advancing foundational elements of our general information technology controls. Our remediation actions related to our GITC environment included the following:

We established policies, trained personnel and implemented policies and procedures over logical access and general information technology controls.

We automated user access reviews.

We implemented policies and mitigating controls over incompatible segregation of duties within our information technology systems.

Monitoring Activities:

Our remediation actions related to monitoring our internal controls over financial reporting included the following:

Enhanced control activities within our process to recognize revenue, including:

Leveraging advanced technology to substantively evaluate and monitor revenue, accounts receivable, cash receipts and other accounts and activities associated with revenue recognition.
Implementing a monitoring control which leverages advanced analytical processes to evaluate the appropriateness of revenue related transactions across key business units.

Implementing systematic segregation of duties through system enabled work flow.

Developing and implementing continuous monitoring of global financial reporting controls.

24Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Corporate Governance

When fully implemented and operational, we believe the controls we have designed or plan to design will remediate the control deficiencies that have led to the material

weaknesses we have identified and strengthen our internal controls over financial reporting.

Code of Conduct

The board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that sets forth standards regarding matters such as honest and ethical conduct, compliance with law, and full, fair, accurate, and timely disclosure in reports and documents we file with the SEC and in other public communications. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and three most highly compensated otherprincipal

accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available at our website,www.stericycle.com,and is available free of charge on written request to Investor Relations, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, IL 60045. Any amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or waivers of such provisions granted to certain executive officers (the “named executive officers”):will be disclosed promptly on our website.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Name and Principal Position

  Year     Salary($)     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(1)
   Option
Awards(2)($)
   All Other
Compensation(3)($)
     Total($) 

Charles A. Alutto(4)

President and Chief

Executive Officer

   

 

 

2015

2014

2013

  

  

  

    $

 

 

488,269

379,615

348,077

  

  

  

     

 

 

$465,327

721,875

513,215

  

  

  

   

 

 

$2,510,200

2,532,320

3,176,224

  

  

  

   

 

 

$1,750

1,750

1,750

  

  

  

    $

 

 

3,465,546

3,635,560

4,039,266

  

  

  

Mark C. Miller(5)

Executive Chairman

of the Board

   

 

 

2015

2014

2013

  

  

  

    $

 

 

147,462

142,000

144,423

  

  

  

     

 

 

$  87,194

191,700

149,917

  

  

  

   

 

 

$   753,060

766,080

1,164,616

  

  

  

   

 

 

$1,750

1,750

1,750

  

  

  

    $

 

 

989,466

1,101,530

1,460,706

  

  

  

Daniel V. Ginnetti(6)

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

   

 

2015

2014

  

  

    $

 

346,923

275,385

  

  

     

 

$234,871

187,200

  

  

   

 

$1,026,900

478,200

  

  

   

 

$1,750

1,750

  

  

    $

 

1,610,444

942,535

  

  

Brent Arnold(7)

Executive Vice President

and Chief Operating Officer

   2015      $343,077       $234,871     $1,026,900     $1,750      $1,606,598  

Michael J. Collins(8)

Executive Vice President and President, Recall and Return Management Systems

   

 

 

2015

2014

2013

  

  

  

    $

 

 

342,500

296,154

272,115

  

  

  

     

 

 

$205,703

405,000

290,333

  

  

  

   

 

 

$   753,060

766,080

952,867

  

  

  

   

 

 

$1,750

1,750

1,750

  

  

  

    $

 

 

1,303,013

1,468,984

1,517,065

  

  

  

(1)The amounts in this column are the gross amounts of the named executive officer’s annual cash performance bonus for the particular year before any conversion of the bonus into an option pursuant to our bonus conversion program. See the second paragraph of note (2) and notes (4)-(8).

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires our directors, executive officers and persons beneficially owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock to file periodic reports of stock ownership and stock transactions with the SEC. During 2017 and 2018, due to the failure of an investment advisor with discretionary authority to inform Mr. Anderson of certain transactions in our common stock, Mr. Anderson failed to

timely file eleven forms 4 to report eleven transactions. In addition, due to administrative oversight by the Company, Mr. Brown and Mr. Chen each failed to timely file a form 4 to report the conversion of depositary shares into shares of our common stock and Mr. Richard Hoffman failed to timely file a form 4 to report grants of stock options, time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based RSUs.

 

(2)The amounts in this column represent the fair value of options that we granted in 2015, 2014, and 2013 determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), excluding the effect of the expected forfeiture rate. The assumptions made in the valuation of these options are described at the end of Note 6, Stock Based Compensation, to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (available atwww.stericycle.com).

Additional Information

 

The amount in this column for a particular year does not include the fair value of any option that we granted during that year pursuant to our bonus conversion program in respect of the named executive officer’s annual cash performance bonus for the prior year. See the following notes (4)-(8).

We will provide a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 without charge to each stockholder as of the record date who sends a written request to Investor Relations, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. Copies of this

proxy statement and our Form10-K as filed with the SEC are available in .pdf format on our investor relations website,http://investors.stericycle.com.Copies of this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form10-K also may be accessed directly from the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov.

 

(3)The amounts in this column represent our matching 401(k) plan contributions for 2015, 2014, and 2013 for each of our named executive officers.

Communications with the Board

 

(4)The amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for Mr. Alutto are the gross amounts of his annual cash performance bonuses for 2015, 2014 and 2013. Pursuant to our bonus conversion program, Mr. Alutto elected to forgo $23,266 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2015 and received instead an option for 1,007 shares, a net cash bonus of $442,061, he elected to forgo $72,188 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2014 and received instead an option for 2,435 shares, and a net cash bonus of $649,688; and he elected to forgo $51,321 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2013 and received instead an option for 1,873 shares and a net cash bonus of $461,893. The fair value of these bonus conversion options is not included in the amount in Mr. Alutto’s “Option Awards” column.

Stockholders and other interested parties who would like to communicate with the Board may do so by writing to the Board of Directors, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. Our Investor Relations department will process all communications received. Communications relating to matters within the scope of the Board’s responsibilities will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board and, at his direction, to the other directors.

(5)The amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for Mr. Miller are the gross amounts of his annual cash performance bonuses for 2015, 2014, and 2013. Pursuant to our bonus conversion program, Mr. Miller elected to forgo his entire annual cash performance bonus for each of these years and received instead options for 3,773, 6,468, and 5,470 shares, respectively. The fair value of these bonus conversion options is not included in the amounts in Mr. Miller’s “Option Awards” column.

Communications relating to ordinaryday-to-day business matters that are not within the scope of the Board’s responsibilities will be forwarded to the appropriate officer or executive. Communications addressed to a particular committee of the Board will be forwarded to the chair of that committee and, at his or her direction, to the other members of the committee.

(6)Mr. Ginnetti became an executive officer when he was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on August 1, 2014. The amount in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for Mr. Ginnetti is the gross amount of his annual cash performance bonus for 2015 and 2014. Pursuant to our bonus conversion program, Mr. Ginnetti elected to forgo $58,718 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2015 and received instead an option for 508 shares and a net cash bonus of $164,409. The fair value of these bonus conversion options is not included in the amounts in Mr. Ginnetti’s “Option Awards” column.

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 25


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(7)Mr. Arnold became an executive officer when he was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer on January 1, 2015. The amount in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for Mr. Arnold is the gross amount of his annual cash performance bonus for 2015. Pursuant to our bonus conversion program, Mr. Arnold elected to forgo $58,718 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2015 and received instead an option for 508 shares and a net cash bonus of $164,409. The fair value of these bonus conversion options is not included in the amounts in Mr. Arnold’s “Option Awards” column.

(8)The amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for Mr. Collins are the gross amounts of his annual cash performance bonuses for 2015, 2014 and 2013. Pursuant to our bonus conversion program, Mr. Collins did not elect to forgo any of his annual cash performance bonus of $205,703 for 2015, he elected to forgo $81,000 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2014 and received instead an option for 2,733 shares and a net cash bonus of $324,000; and he elected to forgo $58,067 of his annual cash performance bonus for 2013 and received instead an option for 2,119 shares and a net cash bonus of $232,266. The fair value of these bonus conversion options is not included in the amounts in Mr. Collins’s “Option Awards” column.

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 2625


GRANTSITEM 1 ELECTION OF PLAN-BASED AWARDSDIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Director Compensation

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDSDirector Compensation

 

TheFor 2018, each outside director’s compensation consisted of an annual cash retainer of $80,000 and an annual equity retainer of $125,000. Unless deferred, the annual equity retainer was paid entirely in time-based RSU’s which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. We also paid the following table provides information aboutretainers to directors with additional responsibilities as the stock options granted to our named executive officers during 2015.Chairman of the Board or the Chair of a committee:

 

Name Grant Date   Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards:
Annual Cash
Performance Bonuses(1)
   

Option Awards(2):

Number of Securities
Underlying Options(#)

   Exercise or Base
Price of Option
Awards($/Sh)
   

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock and

Option Awards($)

 
         
   

Threshold

($)

   

Target

($)

   

Maximum

($)

       

Charles A. Alutto

  2/06/15     303,125     606,250     1,212,500     112,435     $130.19     $2,510,200  

Mark C. Miller

  2/06/15     56,800     113,600     226,000     39,468     $130.19     753,060  

Brent Arnold

  2/06/15     153,000     306,000     612,000     45,337     $130.19     1,026,900  

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  2/06/15     153,000     306,000     612,000     45,000     $130.19     1,026,900  

Michael J. Collins

  2/06/15     104,000     208,000     536,000     35,733     $130.19     753,060  
(1)As described above, awards under our annual cash performance bonus program are based on the achievement of certain performance metrics. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Overview – Annual Cash Performance Bonuses and – Compensation Decisions – Annual Cash Performance Bonuses for more information.
Chairman of the Board – $50,000 cash and $50,000 in RSUs

 

(2)All of these options were granted under our 2008 Incentive Stock Plan or 2011 Incentive Stock Plan. This column includes options granted in February 2015 by reason of the named executive officers’ conversion, pursuant to our bonus conversion program, of all or part of their respective annual cash performance bonuses for 2014. It does not include options granted in February 2016 by reason of the named executive officers’ conversion, pursuant to our bonus conversion program, of all or part of their respective annual cash performance bonuses for 2015.
Chair of the Audit Committee – $20,000

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 27


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Chair of the Compensation Committee – $15,000

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table provides information about

Chair of the outstandingNominating and Governance Committee – $12,500

Under the terms of the Director Compensation Plan, directors may elect to convert all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to time-based RSUs. Directors may also elect to defer receipt of any or a portion of their annual director compensation and convert such compensation to deferred stock options held byunits (DSUs). DSUs are generally payable in the named executive officers asform of December 31, 2015.

shares of our common stock within a certain period after a director’s death or other separation from service. We did not makepay any awardsother fees or other cash compensation to our named executive officersdirectors who served during 20152018 or earlier of shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or similar rights under an “equity incentive plan”provide them with any perquisites or other planpersonal benefits. Directors are not paid separate fees for attending meetings of the Board or arrangement, and accordingly, no such shares, units or rights were held by any of our executive officers as of December 31, 2015 except as described in notes (2) and (3) below:its committees.

   Option Awards 
Name  

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Exercisable

   

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price

   

Option

Expiration

Date(1)

 

Charles A. Alutto

   27,000         $54.59     6/18/2018  
   6,984         $63.00     7/30/2020  
   25,512     6,378    $85.00     2/8/2021  
   23,800     95,200    $115.69     2/11/2022  
   36,000     24,000    $86.24     2/13/2022  
        110,000    $130.19     2/6/2023  
   60,371     87,300    $95.87     2/20/2023  
   1,873         $115.69     2/11/2024  
   2,435         $130.19     2/6/2025  

Mark C. Miller

   60,946         $38.57     2/6/2017  
   120,393         $53.15     2/15/2018  
   162,676         $46.83     2/10/2019  
   242,253         $51.55     2/9/2020  
   20,000         $51.20     2/10/2020  
   163,401     31,830    $85.00     2/8/2021  
   7,200     28,800    $115.69     2/11/2022  
   93,998     44,000    $86.24     2/13/2022  
        33,000    $130.19     2/6/2023  
   33,705     32,010    $95.87     2/20/2023  
   5,470         $115.69     2/11/2024  
   6,468         $130.19     2/6/2025  

Daniel V. Ginnetti(2)

   8,000         $53.15     2/15/2018  
   3,500         $50.82     6/27/2018  
   15,684         $46.83     2/10/2019  
   12,000         $51.55     2/9/2020  
   8,560     2,140    $85.00     2/8/2021  
   3,000     12,000    $115.69     2/11/2022  
   6,720     4,480    $86.24     2/13/2022  
   1,500     6,000    $116.81     8/1/2022  
        45,000    $130.19     2/6/2023  
    5,820     8,730    $95.87     2/20/2023  

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 28


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

   Option Awards 
Name  

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Exercisable

   

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price

   

Option

Expiration

Date(1)

 

Brent Arnold(3)

   5,061         $46.83     2/10/2019  
   404         $47.24     3/2/2019  
   11,500         $51.55     2/9/2020  
   792         $55.57     3/1/2020  
   8,960     2,240    $85.00     2/8/2021  
   629         $83.88     3/1/2021  
   3,000     12,000    $115.69     2/11/2022  
   6,720     4,480    $86.24     2/13/2022  
   711         $86.89     2/28/2022  
   1,500     6,000    $110.14     4/14/2022  
        45,000    $130.19     2/6/2023  
   5,820     8,730    $95.87     2/20/2023  
   448         $97.36     3/7/2023  
   337         $130.19     2/6/2025  

Michael J. Collins

   1,939         $51.55     2/9/2020  
   11,036     5,414    $85.00     2/8/2021  
   7,200     28,800    $115.69     2/11/2022  
   23,460     14,000    $86.24     2/13/2022  
        33,000    $130.19     2/6/2023  
   19,467     26,190    $95.87     2/20/2023  
   2,119         $115.69     2/11/2024  
    2,733         $130.19     2/6/2025  

(1)Other than options listed with expiration dates of February 11, 2022, April 14, 2022 and February 6, 2025 which have 8-year terms and expire on the eighth anniversary of the option grant date, these options have 10-year terms and expire on the tenth anniversary of the option grant date. Options generally vest at the rate of one-fifth (20%) of the option shares on each of the first five anniversaries of the option grant date. Options granted pursuant to our bonus conversion program are immediately vested.

(2)Mr. Ginnetti holds 2,500 restricted stock units that were granted to him on February 13, 2012 prior to his becoming an executive officer. All of these restricted stock units vest on February 13, 2017. Based on the closing price of our common stock of $120.60 on December 31, 2015 as reported on NASDAQ, these restricted stock units have a market value of $301,500.

(3)Mr. Arnold holds 2,500 restricted stock units that were granted to him on February 13, 2012 prior to his becoming an executive officer. All of these restricted stock units vest on February 13, 2017. Based on the closing price of our common stock of $120.60 on December 31, 2015 as reported on NASDAQ, these restricted stock units have a market value of $301,500.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 29


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table provides information about option exercises by the named executive officers during 2015. Prior to 2016, we did not award shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or similar rights to any of our named executive officers, and accordingly no such shares, units or rights vested during 2015:

   Option Awards 

Name

  

Number of Shares

Acquired on
Exercise(1)

(#)

  

Value Realized

on Exercise(2)

($)

 

Charles A. Alutto

   9,000   $709,859  

Mark C. Miller

      $  

Daniel V. Ginnetti

   10,000   $904,790  

Brent Arnold

   9,000   $806,675  

Michael J. Collins

   25,000   $1,590,785  
(1)The information in this column is provided on an aggregate basis, and includes (i) option shares canceled in a net exercise of the option (in which option shares with a value equal to the exercise price and related withholding taxes are canceled in satisfaction of those amounts) and (ii) option shares acquired and concurrently sold to pay the exercise price and related withholding taxes in a “cashless” exercise of the option through a broker.

(2)The information in this column is provided on an aggregate basis. The value realized on the exercise of an option was determined by multiplying the number of shares for which the option was exercised by the difference between (i) either (A) the closing price of our common stock on the date of exercise, in the case of payment of the exercise price in cash or by delivery of shares of our common stock for cancelation or by a net exercise of the option, or (B) the sales price, in the case of a “cashless” exercise of the option, and (ii) the exercise price per share of the option.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 30


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following table provides information about the compensation paid to our directors in 2015:2018. Neither Mr. Alutto nor Ms. Miller received any additional compensation for his or her services as a director. In addition, Mr. Hackney and Mr. Hooley were not directors during 2018 and did not receive any director compensation during that year.

 

Name

 

Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash

($)

  Stock
Awards
($)
  

Option
Awards

($)(1)

  

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

  

All Other
Compensation

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Mark C. Miller, Executive Chairman(2)

                        

Jack W. Schuler, Lead Director

         $106,017           $106,017  

Charles A. Alutto(3)

                        

Lynn D. Bleil(4)

         $292,410           $292,410  

Thomas D. Brown

         $106,017           $106,017  

Thomas Chen

         $106,017           $106,017  

Rod F. Dammeyer(5)

         $114,488           $114,488  

William K. Hall(6)

         $110,252           $110,252  

John Patience

         $106,017           $106,017  

Mike S. Zafirovski

         $106,017           $106,017  
  Name  Fees Earned
or Provided
in
Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total 

Brian P. Anderson

  $75,000   $125,000   $200,000 

Lynn D. Bleil

   46,250   145,000    191,250 

Thomas D. Brown

       195,000    195,000 

Thomas F. Chen

   60,000    125,000    185,000 

Veronica M. Hagen

   32,500    116,000    148,500 

Mark C. Miller

   40,000    125,000    165,000 

Robert S. Murley

   85,000    175,000    260,000 

Kay G. Priestly

   32,500    116,000    148,500 

Mike Zafirovski

 

   

 

60,000

 

 

 

   

 

125,000

 

 

 

   

 

185,000

 

 

 

(1)The amounts in this column represent the fair value of options that we granted in 2015 determined

Stock awards are valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excludingbased on the effect of the expected forfeiture rate. The assumptions made in the valuation of these stock options are described at the end of Note 6, Stock Based Compensation, to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (available atwww.stericycle.com).

As of December 31, 2015, our outside directors held vested and unvested options for the following number of sharesclosing price of our common stock: Mr. Schuler, 27,100 shares; Ms. Bleil, 12,809 shares; Mr. Brown, 57,776 shares; Mr. Chen, 18,007 shares; Mr. Dammeyer, 39,457 shares; Mr. Hall, 27,472 shares; Mr. Patience, 50,671 shares; and Mr. Zafirovski, 28,889 shares.stock on the date of the grant.

(2)Mr. Miller receives no additional compensation for his services as a director.

(3)Mr. Alutto receives no additional compensation for his services as a director.

(4)Pursuant to our Outside Directors Compensation Plan, Ms. Bleil received two options upon joining the Board in May 2015, each for a number of shares determined in accordance with the formulas described below under “Option Grants to New Directors.” The first option, for joining the Board, was for 7,878 shares and the second upon, reflecting his annual compensation as a director, was for 4,931 shares.

(5)Mr. Dammeyer received options for an additional 394 shares for his service as chairman of the Audit Committee.

(6)Mr. Hall received options for an additional 197 shares for his service as chairman of the Compensation Committee.

Compensation in 2015Plan for 2019

 

We did not pay any fees or other cash

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews director compensation to ensure it remains competitive with our directors who served during 2015 or provide them with any perquisites or other personal benefits. Pursuantpeer group. During 2018, the Compensation Committee asked its independent compensation consultant to conduct a market

evaluation of our director pay programs relative to the market and to our Outside Directorspeer group. After reviewing the results of that analysis, the Compensation Plan, we granted an optionCommittee recommended no changes to the director pay program for 4,931 shares to each of our outside directors elected at the annual meeting of stockholders in May 2015. The number of option shares was determined by dividing (i) the product of five times the director’s annual compensation of $125,000 by (ii) the average closing price of a share of our common stock2019.

 

2016Proxy Statement26  Stericycle, Inc. • 31 - 2019 Proxy Statement


DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AONE-YEAR TERM

Director Compensation

 

during the 12-month period ending on the last trading day prior to the annual meeting ($126.76). The exercise price per share was the closing price of our common stock on the day of the annual meeting ($138.45), and the option vests on the first anniversary of the meeting (May 27, 2016). Mr. Dammeyer and Mr. Hall received options for an additional 394 and 197 shares for their services as Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees, respectively.Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

Outside Directors Compensation Plan

In February 2016, the Board modified our Outside Directors Compensation Plan to align the compensation of our outside directors with the changes made to the compensation of our executive officers. Under our Outside Directors Compensation Plan, each director’s annual compensation for his or her services is $125,000 (the “annual retainer”). The Board reviews this amount annually and may update the annual retainer from time to time based on formal or informal surveys of outside directors’ compensation. Subject to the election by an eligible director to receive payment of his or her annual retainer in cash, the normal form of payment of an outside director’s annual retainer is (i) a stock option reflecting the conversion of 75%, or $93,750, of the annual retainer and (ii) a restricted stock unit (RSU) award reflecting the conversion of 25%, or $31,250, of the annual retainer. The option and RSU award are granted by reason of a director’s reelection as a director at the annual meeting of stockholders each year.

The option is for a number of shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) five times the amount of the director’s annual retainer to be converted into an option ($93,750) by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date. The RSU award is for a number of shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) two times the amount of the director’s annual retainer to be converted into an RSU award ($31,250) by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date. The exercise price of the option is the closing price on the grant date. Both the option and the RSU award fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Any portion of a director’s annual retainer that he or she elects to receive in cash is paid in 12 equal monthly installments.

Stock Ownership Requirements

Under our Outside DirectorsDirector Compensation Plan, all directors are requiredexpected to hold a minimum position in our common stock. For a directorWe established this program to help align the long-term interests of directors with less than five years of service, he or she must have a position equal to three times his or her annual retainer, or $375,000. For a director with five or more years of service, he or she must have a position equal to five times his or her annual retainer, or $625,000. A director’s ownership position is measured by the valueinterests of our stockholders. Eachnon-employee director is expected to hold four times the annual cash retainer in our common stockstock.

Although there is no specific period of time in which directors are required to achieve the applicable ownership threshold, they are expected to make continuous progress

toward that he or she owns directly and indirectly, the value of the vested and unvested RSUsgoal. To that he or she holds, and the in-the-money value of the vested and unvested stock options that he or she holds.

Aend, eachnon-employee director who satisfies the minimum ownership requirement may elect to receive all or a portionmust retain 75% of his or her annual retainer in cash. A director who does not satisfystock or option awards until the minimum position requirement has been achieved.

Compliance with these ownership requirement must receive his or her annual retainer inguidelines is measured following the normal form of paymentsame process as a stock option and RSU award. A director who does not satisfy the applicable minimum ownership requirement may not sell any shares of our common stock, with the exception that the director may engage in a “cashless” exercise of an option and sell a number of shares sufficient to pay the exercise price of the option shares and the related withholding taxes.

All of our outside directors currently satisfy the applicable minimumused for confirming stock ownership requirement other than Mr. Chen who became a director in May 2014 and Ms. Bleil who became a director in May 2015.

Meeting and Other Fees

Under our Outside Directorsby executive officers. See “Stock Ownership Guidelines” under the “Other Compensation Plan, directors are not paid separate fees for attending meetings of the Board of Directors or its committees. No fees are paid to the Executive Chairman of the Board for his service as chairman. The chairman of the Audit Committee is paid a fee of $10,000 per year for his service as chairman, and the chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid a fee of $5,000 per year for his service as chairman.Matters” section.

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 32


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The fees to the chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees are paid by adding each chairman’s fee to and treating it as a part of his annual retainer. The chairmen’s fees are reviewed annually and updated from time to time on the basis of formal or informal surveys of outside director compensation.

Option Grants to New Directors

Our Outside Directors Compensation Plan provides that a new director will be granted two stock options and two RSU awards upon joining the Board. The first option, for joining the Board, is for a number of shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the product of 10 times 75%, or $93,750, of the annual retainer by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date. The first RSU award, for joining the board, is for a number of shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) 4 times 25%, or $31,250, of the annual retainer by (B) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date. The exercise price of the option is the closing price on the grant date, and one-fifth of the option shares and one-fifth of the RSU award vest on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date.

The new director will also be granted a second option and second RSU award reflecting his or her annual retainer. If the new director is elected at an annual meeting, the option and the RSU award are the same as the options and RSU awards that the other directors elected at the annual meeting receive. If the new director is elected other than at an annual meeting, (i) the second option is for a number of shares equal to a pro rata portion of the quotient obtained by dividing (A) five times 75% of the director’s annual retainer by (B) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date, and (ii) the second RSU award is for a number of shares equal to a pro rata portion of the quotient obtained by dividing (A) two times 25% of the director’s annual retainer by (B) the average closing price of our common stock during the 12-month period preceding the grant date. The exercise price of the option is the closing price on the grant date. Both the option and the RSU award fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 3327


ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Item 2 Approval of Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan

INTRODUCTION

In March 2016, our Board approved the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”) and recommended submitting the Stock Purchase Plan to our stockholders for their approval at the 2016 Annual Meeting. The Stock Purchase Plan will not become effective unless it is approved by our stockholders.

The purpose of the Stock Purchase Plan is to provide eligible employees of certain Canadian subsidiaries of the Company with an opportunity to become owners of the Company through the purchase of shares of our common stock. The plan authorizes 100,000 shares of our common stock to be purchased by employees through payroll deductions at a 5% discount from the market price of the stock as of the exercise date. The plan is intended to be an “employee stock purchase plan” under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our Board believes that the Stock Purchase Plan will provide an attractive benefit which will enhance our ability to continue to attract and retain dedicated and motivated employees of our Canadian subsidiaries who are critical to our success.

SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL TERMS

The following summary describes the principal terms of the Stock Purchase Plan. The complete text of the plan appears as Exhibit A to this proxy statement.

Overview

The Stock Purchase Plan allows eligible employees of certain of our Canadian subsidiaries to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount during two six-month offering periods each year. An eligible employee who elects to participate in an offering period is granted an option on the first day of the offering period for a number of shares equal to the employee’s payroll deductions under the Stock Purchase Plan during the offering period divided by the option price per share as of the last day of the offering period (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day) (such date is hereinafter referred to as the “exercise date”). The option price per share is equal to 95% of the last reported sales price of a share of our common stock on NASDAQ as of the exercise date.

Administration

The Stock Purchase Plan is administered by our Board. The Board may delegate its authority to administer the Stock Purchase Plan to a committee of the Board or to an administrative committee of officers or other employees. For convenience, the term “plan administrator” is used in the balance of this summary to refer both to our Board and to any committee to which the Board may delegate its authority to administer the Stock Purchase Plan.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Stock Purchase Plan, the plan administrator has the authority and duty to: (i) manage and control the operation of the Stock Purchase Plan; (ii) conclusively interpret and construe the provisions of the Stock Purchase Plan, and prescribe, amend and rescind rules, regulations and procedures relating to the Stock Purchase Plan; (iii) correct any defect or omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Stock Purchase Plan; (iv) determine whether and to what extent a Canadian subsidiary of the Company may participate in the Stock Purchase Plan; and (v) make all other determinations and take all other actions as it deems necessary or desirable for the implementation and administration of the Stock Purchase Plan. The

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 34


ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

determination of the plan administrator on matters within its authorities will be conclusive and binding on the Company, the participating Canadian subsidiaries, the participants and all other persons. Any decision of the plan administrator requires a majority of its members.

Number of Shares

The Stock Purchase Plan authorizes a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to options granted under the plan. In the event of the expiration, withdrawal, termination or other cancellation of an option under the Stock Purchase Plan, the number of shares of common stock that were subject to the option but not delivered will again be available for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock available under the Stock Purchase Plan is subject to adjustment in the event of any transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, spinoff, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination, exchange or other distribution with respect to shares of our common stock or other change in the corporate structure or capitalization affecting our common stock).

Eligibility

Every employee of a participating Canadian subsidiary who has completed six months’ employment as of the first day of an offering period under the Stock Purchase Plan, and who is either (i) a full-time employee or (ii) a part-time employee who customarily works more than 20 hours per week, will be eligible to participate in the offering period. As of July 1, 2016, approximately 3,500 employees would be eligible to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan.

Offering Periods

Each year the Stock Purchase Plan will have two consecutive six-month offering periods during which eligible employees may make payroll deductions that will be credited to participant accounts and used to purchase shares of our common stock. One offering period will begin on January 1 and end on June 30, and the other offering period will begin on July 1 and end on December 31.

Election to Participate

An individual who is an eligible employee on the first day of an offering period may elect to be a participant in the Stock Purchase Plan for that offering period by completing and filing an enrollment agreement in accordance with rules and procedures established by the plan administrator.

Payroll Deduction Percentage

A participant’s enrollment agreement will specify the percentage of his or her compensation (salary or wages) for the offering period that the participant elects to have withheld and credited to his or her account for purposes of exercising the participant’s option for that offering period. The participant may specify any whole percentage of his or her compensation, but a participant’s total payroll deductions may not exceed $5,000 during any offering period (appropriately increased or reduced in the case of any offering period longer or shorter than six months).

Payroll deductions will begin with the first regular payroll period ending on or after the first day of the offering period and end with the last regular payroll period ending on or before the exercise date (or, if earlier, upon the termination of the participant’s employment or other termination of participation in the Stock Purchase Plan). Except in the case of a participant’s election to cease participation or termination of employment (as described below), a participant may not change his or her payroll deductions during an offering period, and a participant’s enrollment agreement will remain in effect indefinitely (for both the offering period in respect of which it was initially filed and all subsequent offering periods) unless the participant modifies the enrollment agreement for a subsequent offering period or the participant’s participation in the Stock Purchase Plan terminates.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 35


ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Grant of Options

Each participant in an offering period will be granted an option as of the first day of the offering period for a number of shares of our common stock equal to his or her payroll deductions under the plan during the offering period divided by the option price per share as of the exercise date.

Option Price

The option price per share of our common stock in any offering period will be equal to 95% of the last reported sales price of a share of our common stock on NASDAQ as of the exercise date.

Exercise of Options

On each exercise date, each participant whose participation in the Stock Purchase Plan for that offering period has not terminated will be deemed to have exercised his or her option with respect to that number of whole shares of our common stock equal to the quotient of (i) the total payroll deductions for the offering period in the participant’s account as of the exercise date and (ii) the exercise price of the option.

Limitations

In any calendar year, no participant may purchase under the Stock Purchase Plan (or any other employee stock purchase plan of the Company or any subsidiary) shares of our common stock having a fair market value (determined as of the first day of an offering period) in excess of $25,000. In addition, no option will be granted to any eligible employee if, immediately after the option is granted, he or she would own (or would be deemed to own, pursuant to the rules of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code) stock possessing 5% or more of the voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any subsidiary.

Election to Cease Participation

A participant may elect to cease participation in an offering period at any time prior to the exercise date and receive a refund of the balance in his or her account. Such an election will serve to cancel the participant’s option and terminate his or her participation in both the current offering period and all subsequent offering periods, and no shares of our common stock will be purchased for the participant for the offering period in which his or her election to cease participation is effective. An election to cease participation in an offering period must be made in the manner and within the time prior to the exercise date that the plan administrator specifies. Any refund of the participant’s account balance pursuant to the participant’s election to cease participation will be paid to him or her, without interest, as soon as practicable following his or her election. A participant’s election to cease participation for one offering period will not affect his or her eligibility to participate in subsequent offering periods, subject to the terms and conditions of the Stock Purchase Plan.

Termination of Employment

In the event that a participant’s employment with the Company and its subsidiaries terminates during an offering period and prior to the exercise date of the offering period for any reason (whether as a result of his or her resignation, death or otherwise), the participant’s option will be automatically cancelled as of the date of the participant’s termination of employment, and no shares of our common stock will be purchased for the participant for the offering period in which his or her termination occurs. All amounts remaining in the participant’s account as of his or her termination date will be refunded to the participant, without interest, as soon as practicable after the participant’s termination date.

Transferability

No participant in an offering period may sell, pledge, transfer or otherwise dispose of his or her option under any circumstances.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 36


ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Reports

After the close of each offering period, a report will be sent to each participant (or made available to the participant through a third party provider) stating the entries made to his or her account, the number of shares of common stock purchased upon exercise of options for the offering period, and the applicable option price.

Amendment and Termination

Our Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Stock Purchase Plan at any time. Our stockholders will be required to approve any amendment that is required by applicable law or the rules of any securities exchange on which our shares of common stock are traded, including an amendment to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan or a change in the eligibility provisions of the Stock Purchase Plan.

Stock Purchase Plan Benefits

The benefits to be derived under the Stock Purchase Plan by any individual are currently undeterminable. Participation in the Stock Purchase Plan is entirely voluntary and benefits will only be realized for those eligible employees who choose to allocate a portion of their compensation to the purchase of our common stock. The total number of shares of our common stock to be purchased during each offering period cannot be determined in advance, as it will vary based on individual elections and the price of our common stock on the grant date and the exercise date.

INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

The following is a brief discussion of the U.S. Federal income tax treatment that will generally apply to grants of options and Stock Purchase Plan by U.S. taxpayers based on the current U.S. Federal tax laws and regulations presently in effect, which are subject to change, and it does not purport to be a complete description of the Federal income tax aspects of the Plan. The following does not discuss any foreign, state or local tax consequences in connection with grants of options and purchases under the Stock Purchase Plan.

No income will be taxable to a participant upon the grant of an option under the Stock Purchase Plan or at the time shares of our common stock are purchased under the Stock Purchase Plan and we will not be entitled to a deduction. Upon the disposition of the shares acquired upon exercise of an option, the tax treatment, and our entitlement to a deduction, depends on whether the shares acquired pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan are held for the “holding period” which is the 2 year period after the date the option is granted and one year after the exercise date, as summarized below.

In the event shares of our common stock are sold or disposed of prior to the expiration of the holding period, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date over the option price will be treated as ordinary income to the participant. This excess will constitute ordinary income in the year of sale or other disposition even if no gain is realized on the sale or a gratuitous transfer of the shares is made. The balance of any gain will be treated as capital gain. Even if the shares are sold for less than their fair market value on the exercise date, the same amount of ordinary income is attributed to a participant and a capital loss is recognized equal to the difference between the sale price and the value of the shares on the exercise date. If a sale or disposition occurs before the expiration of the holding period, we will be entitled to a deduction for the taxable year in which such sale or disposition occurs in the same amount includible as compensation in the participant’s ordinary income.

In the event that shares of our common stock acquired pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan are sold or disposed of (including by way of gift) after the expiration of the holding period, the participant’s ordinary income will

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 37


ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

equal the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the Grant Date (first day of the Offering Period) over the option price or (ii) the gain actually realized by the participant on the sale of the shares (if there is a gain). Any further gain on disposition will be treated as capital gain and any loss will be treated as a capital loss. If the participant holds the acquired shares for the holding period, we will not be entitled to a deduction for Federal income tax purposes with respect to shares transferred to a participant.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 38


ITEM 3 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016

Item 3 Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2016

We have appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our incorporation in March 1989. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, audit of our internal control over financial reporting and review of our interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required internationally, and assistance with and review of certain documents and letters filed with the SEC during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were approximately $5.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

AUDIT-RELATED FEES

Ernst & Young LLP did not provide any audit-related services or other assurance or related services to us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

TAX FEES

The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning services provided to us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were approximately $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

ALL OTHER FEES

Ernst & Young LLP did not provide any other services to us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

In accordance with policies adopted by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, all audit and non-audit related services to be performed for us by our independent public accountants must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, our Board of Directors may reconsider their appointment.

The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors recommend that stockholders vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 39


ITEM 4 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 4    Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking our stockholders to approve, by means of anon-binding advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

This proposal, popularly known as “say-on-pay,“say-on-pay, enables stockholders to express or withhold their approval of our executive compensation program in general. The vote is intended to provide an assessment by our stockholders of our overall executive compensation program and not of any one or more particular elements of that program. The Compensation Committee and the full Board intend to consider and take into account the outcome of thisnon-binding advisory vote in making future executive compensation decisions. Because this vote is advisory andnon-binding, it will not necessarily affect or otherwise limit any future compensation of any of our named executive officers. This advisory vote to approve executive compensation will be held on an annual basis at least until the next advisory vote to determine the frequency of such vote.

vote, which is expected to be in 2023.

Our executive compensation program is described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement and the related tables and narrative discussion. Stockholders are strongly urged to read this material in its entirety, and in particular to read the “Overview” on pages 18—20,“Executive Summary” section of “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” to obtain an informed understanding of our executive compensation program.

We believe that our executive compensation program is firmly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our executive compensation program has as its objectives (i) attracting, motivating and retaining highly qualified executive officers and (ii) structuring most of their compensation, aside from their base salaries, to be dependent on the Company’sour attainment of measurable Company-wide performance targets and the sustained growth in our stock price, so that they benefit only if our stockholders benefit.

We believe that our executive compensation program satisfies these objectives. Our executive compensation program consists of short-term cash compensation and long-term equity-based incentive compensation. For 2015,2018, cash compensation was paid in the form of a base salary and an annual cash performance bonus based on EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), and long-term incentive compensation was paid in the form of stock options.options, time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs. Annual cash performance bonuses are dependent on Company-wide performance,performance. Stock options and stock options, whichRSUs are only granted atlinked to the closing market price on the date of grant, are dependent for their value on the subsequent growth in valueperformance of our stock. Annualcommon stock, and in the case of performance-based RSUs, achievement ofpre-established earnings per share (“EPS”) goals. With respect to 2018, cash performance bonusescompensation represented 13.7%30% and stock options represented 67.6%equity compensation 70% of our CEO’s total direct compensation and cash compensation represented 37% and equity compensation represented 62% of our other NEO’s total direct compensation, respectively (we excluded separation payments from calculation of these percentages). Based on 2018 fiscal year performance, our executive officers’ compensation during 2015 and together represented 83.4% and 87.7%officers earned 24.2% of their compensation during 2014cash incentive target and 2013, respectively.43% of their performance-based RSUs which were tied to 2018 performance.

For these reasons and the reasons elaboratedAs more fully discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and the related tables and narrative discussion, the Board of Directors requests stockholders to approve the following resolution:

Resolved, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid toof the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of this advisory resolution on the compensation of our Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement, includingstatement. Proxies solicited by the “CompensationBoard will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.

28Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

Our 2018 Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis” sectionAnalysis explains our executive compensation program generally and the related compensation tablesawarded to our CEO, CFO, our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of the end of 2018, and narrative discussion.

The Boardtwo additional individuals who would have been included as one of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” this advisory voteour three most highly compensated executives but for the fact they were not serving as executive officers as of the end of 2018. These executives, referred to approveas our “named executive compensation.officers” or “NEOs”, were:

 

2016Name

Title (as of December 31, 2018)

Charles A. Alutto

Chief Executive Officer

Cindy J. Miller

President and Chief Operating Officer

Daniel V. Ginnetti

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Kurt M. Rogers

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

Executive Vice President, Communication and Related Services

Joseph B. Arnold

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Brenda R. Frank

Former Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer

Stericycle’s Executive Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is developed by the Compensation Committee and approved annually by the Board of Directors.

The compensation program for executive officers has two objectives:

1.

To attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executive officers; and

2.

To structure the bulk of executive compensation to be dependent on Stericycle’s attainment of measurable Company-wide performance targets and sustained growth in our stock price so that executives benefit only if our stockholders benefit.

Our executive compensation program has three components: base salary, short-term incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards. Base salary and annual performance bonuses are paid in cash, and long-term

incentive compensation is paid in the form of stock options, time-based RSUs, and performance-based RSUs. We generally target our executive officers’ total direct compensation to be aligned with the median of our peer group. To ensure appropriate alignment, the Compensation Committee considers experience, individual contribution, and the Company’s performance relative to its peer group when setting pay levels.

The Compensation Committee and the Board work to ensure that our executive compensation program is both market-competitive and performance-oriented. Our executive officers earn base salaries, but the majority of their target compensation comes in annual cash performance bonuses, stock options and time-based and performance-based RSUs. As a result, a substantial portion of our executive officers’ compensation is influenced, either positively or negatively, by Company performance.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement29


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

Our Executive Compensation Best Practices

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the executive compensation program to ensure that it is aligned with our compensation philosophy, our Company objectives, and stockholder interests. Highlights of key elements of and exclusions from our program are noted below.

  What We Do:What We Don’t Do:

Deliver significant percentage of target annual compensation as variable compensation tied to performanceNore-pricing of underwater stock options

Align executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests through long-term incentive compensation paid in equityNo excessive perquisites or personal benefits

Maintain an executive compensation clawback policyNo employment contracts for NEOs

Cap annual and long-term incentive awards

Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee

Prohibit officers and directors from engaging in hedging, pledging or short sale transactions involving our securities

Regular review of proxy advisor policies and corporate governance best practices

Maintain stock ownership and retention guidelines

Provide “double-trigger” vesting of equity awards in connection with a change in control

Our Executive Compensation Program for 2018

Historically, our named executive officers received salaries significantly below those of comparable executives in our peer group of companies. Beginning in 2015, the Compensation Committee embarked on a four-year plan to move salaries of our executive officers toward the median of our peer group of companies. Subsequent to our acquisition ofShred-it in 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that this four-year timetable needed to be accelerated to reflect the increased responsibilities of the executives, to preserve internal equity, and to support retention. In 2017, our named executive officer salaries were adjusted upward and annual cash performance targets were adjusted downward moving our named executive officer direct cash compensation toward the median of our peer group companies, which completed the plan approved in 2015. For 2018, no changes were made to the salaries or bonus targets for the named executive officers.

For 2018, our named executive officers’ annual cash performance bonuses were based upon the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA targets developed from our annual operating plan and adjusted return on invested capital (Adjusted ROIC). Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization excluding acquisition-related expenses and other various expenses that do not reflect the ongoing performance of the business. The approach used for Adjusted EBITDA for executive compensation is consistent with that used for communicating the financial performance

of the company and is reviewed quarterly by both the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Adjusted ROIC excludes the impact of acquisitions within the current year. The calculation for Adjusted ROIC is net operating profit after taxes and amortization (NOPATA) excluding acquisition-related expenses and other various expenses that do not reflect the ongoing performance of the business divided by invested capital. In 2018, Adjusted ROIC excluded the impact of acquisition expenses, integration expenses, restructuring and plant conversion expenses, the change in fair value of contingent considerations, contract exit costs, asset impairment charges, litigation expenses, and insurance proceeds. For additional detail and reconciliations, see Appendix A to this proxy statement.

The Board believes these two metrics for the annual cash performance bonus provide strong incentives to our executive officers to improve our operating performance and the return on our capital employed, thereby creating value for our stockholders.

Our executives are also compensated with a long-term incentive program in the form of equity grants. For 2018, the award structure of the long-term incentive plan was equally divided among stock options, time-based RSUs, and performance-based RSUs. These grants of equity were designed to incentivize our named executive officers to focus on long-term value creation.

30  Stericycle, Inc. •  - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The principal elements of our executive compensation program for 2018 are summarized below. These elements are discussed in more detail under “2018 Compensation Program Highlights.”

Compensation

Element

40Form of
Compensation
Performance and
Vesting Criteria
Purpose

Base Salary

CashN/A

Provide fixed compensation to attract and retain key executives and to offset external factors that may impact incentive pay

Annual Cash

Bonus

Cash

Annual Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted ROIC objectives

Incentivize executives to achieve annual performance goals and be rewarded commensurately

Long-term

Incentives

Stock Options (1/3)
Time-based RSUs (1/3)

Performance-based
RSUs (1/3)

Five year ratable vesting based on continuous service

Vest, or not, in three equal annual installments depending onachievement of pre-established performance metrics

Incentivize long-term value creation and align management’s interests with those of our shareholders

For 2018, approximately 82% of our CEO’s target total compensation and approximately 73% of our other NEO’s target total compensation was at risk.

The chart below illustrates how these components were allocated in actual total compensation received by our NEOs in 2018 (we excluded separation payments from calculation of these percentages).

LOGO

2018 CEO Compensation Mix 2018 Other NEO Compensation Mix

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement31


ITEM 5 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON INDEPENDENT CHAIRMANCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Compensation-Setting Process

 

Item 5 Stockholder Proposal on Independent ChairmanOur Compensation-Setting Process

Compensation Committee

 

The Teamsters General Fund

Compensation decisions for our executive officers are made by the Compensation Committee of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001, a beneficial owner of 55 shares of our common stock, has submitted the following resolution for consideration by stockholders:

RESOLVED: The stockholders of Stericycle, Inc. (the “Company”), ask the Board of Directors, subject in some instances to adopt a policy that, whenever possible,approval by the board chairman should be a director who has not previously served as an executive officerfull Board. All of

the Company and who is “independent” of management. For these purposes, a director shall not be considered “independent” if, during the last three years, he or she—

was affiliated with a company that was an advisor or consultant to the Company, or a significant customer or supplier of the Company;

was employed by or had a personal service contract(s) with the Company or its senior management;

was affiliated with a company or non-profit entity that received the greater of $2 million or 2% of its gross annual revenues from the Company;

had a business relationship with the Company that the Company had to discloseCommittee’s members are independent under the Securitiesapplicable SEC rules and Exchange Commission regulations;Nasdaq listing standards.

has been employed by a public company at which an executive officer of the Company serves as a director;

had a relationship of the sort described above with any affiliate of the Company; and,

was a spouse, parent, child, sibling or in-law of any person described above.

 

The policy should be implemented without violating any contractual obligation and should specify how to select an independent chairman if a current chairman ceases to be independent between annual shareholder meetings. Compliance with the policy may be excused if no independent director is available and willing to be chairman.

SUPPORTING STATEMENTPeer Group

 

 

Our peer group is composed of companies that are similar to us in terms of revenue, number of employees, services offered, and industries served. The BoardCompanies in the peer group are also representative of Directors, led by its chairman, is responsiblethe types of companies we compete with for protecting shareholders’ long-term interests by providing independent oversightexecutive talent. The Compensation

Committee refers to information about our peer group primarily for the purpose of management, includingbenchmarking the CEO, in directingNEOs’ total direct compensation pay levels, pay practices and industry pay trends.

For 2018, the corporation’s affairs. This oversight can be diminished whenpeer group consisted of the chairman is not independent.following companies:

 

Company Name

  2017 Revenue
($MM)
   Employees   Industry Focus 

ABM Industries Incorporated

  

 

$  5,986

 

  

 

140,000

 

  

 

Business services

 

Advanced Disposal Services, Inc.

  

 

1,540

 

  

 

5,939

 

  

 

Environmental and facilities services

 

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

  

 

2,022

 

  

 

11,800

 

  

 

Medical laboratories & research

 

Cintas Corporation

  

 

6,477

 

  

 

41,000

 

  

 

Business services

 

Clean Harbors, Inc.

  

 

3,102

 

  

 

12,700

 

  

 

Waste management

 

CoreCivic, Inc.

  

 

1,774

 

  

 

12,875

 

  

 

REIT – Diversified

 

Covanta Holding Corporation

  

 

1,836

 

  

 

3,700

 

  

 

Waste management

 

Ecolab Inc.

  

 

14,376

 

  

 

48,400

 

  

 

Cleaning products

 

Equifax, Inc.

  

 

3,416

 

  

 

10,300

 

  

 

Credit services

 

Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

  

 

1,996

 

  

 

55,000

 

  

 

Business services

 

Iron Mountain Incorporated

  

 

4,060

 

  

 

24,000

 

  

 

Specialized REIT

 

J.B. Hunt Transportation Services, Inc.

  

 

7,921

 

  

 

24,681

 

  

 

Transportation services

 

Pitney Bowes, Inc.

  

 

3,819

 

  

 

14,700

 

  

 

Business equipment

 

Republic Services, Inc.

  

 

10,067

 

  

 

35,000

 

  

 

Waste management

 

Rollins, Inc.

  

 

1,754

 

  

 

13,126

 

  

 

Business services

 

Tetra Tech, Inc.

  

 

2,182

 

  

 

16,000

 

  

 

Technical services

 

The Brink’s Company

  

 

3,482

 

  

 

62,150

 

  

 

Security and alarm services

 

UniFirst Corporation

  

 

1,666

 

  

 

14,000

 

  

 

Diversified support services

 

Waste Connections, Inc.

  

 

4,744

 

  

 

15,283

 

  

 

Waste management

 

Stericycle, Inc.

  

 

3,549

 

  

 

25,000

 

  

 

 

 

Environmental and facility
services

 

 
 

Median

  

 

3,416

 

  

 

15,283

 

     

At Stericycle,The Compensation Committee reviews the lengthy tenure, longstanding relationshipspeer group annually and outside financial interests among many of our directors raises serious concerns aboutmakes adjustments if necessary (for example, to remove companies in the board’s ability to provide the rigorous, independent oversight of management required to protect shareholders’ interests. A close look at the nominating committee demonstrates the concerns applicable to the composition of the entire board. The three members of the nominating committee have been on the board for a combined 68 years. These directors also serve together on other corporate boards and made significant investments into the same companies. Shared business endeavors may pose potential conflicts of interest with directors’ duty to put shareholders’ interests first.

In its assessment of Stericycle, MSCI, the independent investment research firm, found: “Long-tenured directors can often form relationships that may compromise their independence and therefore hinder their ability to provide effective oversight. These concerns are aggravated due to additional factors, e.g., the lackcase of an independent chairman, which together with the high number of long-tenured directors raises concerns about whether the board is able to provide an effective counterbalance to management.”

We urge you to vote FOR this proposal.acquisition).

 

2016Proxy Statement32  Stericycle, Inc. • 41 - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 5 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON INDEPENDENT CHAIRMANCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Compensation-Setting Process

Decision-Making Processes

 

 

The Compensation Committee takes into account a number of factors in setting compensation and incentive award opportunities for our executive officers. These decisions are made with a view to reaching an overall result that the Committee believes is appropriate and fair to each executive officer – both in absolute terms and relative to the compensation of the other executive officers – and fair as well to Stericycle and to our stockholders. The Committee also considers each executive officer’s role, contribution to our performance, and the officer’s compensation history in making compensation decisions.

Compensation decisions are typically made at the regular meeting of the Compensation Committee during the fourth quarter of the prior year based on market study results andTHE COMPANY’S STATEMENT IN OPPOSITIONyear-to-date performance of the Company and the executive officers. The Committee considers these results in determining the executive officers’ annual cash performance bonuses for the current year and their base salaries and annual cash performance bonus targets for the upcoming year.

Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of our other NEOs, but management generally does not otherwise participate in the Committee’s decisions. The Committee provides a recommendation for the salary of our NEOs, but the Board must provide final approval.

Decisions regarding the annual stock option and RSU grants to our executive officers and to our employees generally are made during the first Compensation Committee meeting of the year, subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The Committee determines the annual stock option and RSU grants to our executive officers taking into account (i) our overall operating performance, (ii) each executive officer’s individual responsibilities and performance, (iii) competitive market data, (iv) prior stock option and RSU grants, and (v) the goal of limiting stock option and RSU grants to no more than 10% of our fully-diluted shares over a trailing five-year period, thus averaging dilution of no more than 2% a year.

Compensation Consultant

 

 

The Board of Directors believes that this proposal is unnecessaryCompensation Committee has engaged Deloitte Consulting LLP, as its independent compensation consultant, to review our executive compensation philosophy and is not inpractices and the best interestscomposition of our stockholders. Consequently,peer

group of companies. After a review of the Board recommends a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.factors prescribed by SEC and Nasdaq rules and regulations, the Compensation Committee determined that Deloitte Consulting LLP is independent.

2018 Compensation Program Highlights

Base Salaries

 

Having considered our existing corporate governance measures andThe table below illustrates the degree to whichNEOs’ base salaries over the Board exercises independent oversight of management, the Board has concluded that our stockholders are best served by affording the Board the organizational flexibility to select the person best suited for the position of Chairman and to determine the most effective leadership structure for our Company. A requirement that our Chairman be independent unwisely places arbitrary constraints on the judgment of the Board as to how the Company should be governed. Currently, our stockholders are best served by our former President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark C. Miller, serving as Chairman of the Board and Jack W. Schuler serving as an independent Lead Director.past three fiscal years.

 

    2018 Salary   2017 Salary  2016 Salary 

Mr. Alutto

  

$

1,000,000

 

  

$

1,000,000

 

 

$

585,000

 

Ms. Miller

  

 

625,000

 

  

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

550,000

 

  

 

550,000

 

 

 

380,000

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

400,000

 

  

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

Ms. Abdulmassih

  

 

370,000

 

  

 

370,000

 

 

 

N/A

** 

Mr. Arnold

  

 

550,000

 

  

 

550,000

 

 

 

380,000

 

Ms. Frank

  

 

400,000

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

325,000

 

Since January 2013, we have separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and since August 2008 our bylaws have provided that if our Chief Executive Officer or any other officer or employee is serving as Chairman of the Board, the Board is required to appoint an outside director as our Lead Director. Our Chairman of the Board, Mr. Miller, is an officer, and accordingly, the Board has appointed Mr. Schuler as Lead Director. As required by our bylaws, Mr. Schuler is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

*

Ms. Miller and Mr. Rogers were not NEOs in 2017 or 2016.

**

Ms. Abdulmassih was not an NEO in 2016.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement33


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Compensation Program Highlights

 

Until January 2013, Mr. Miller served as our President and Chief Executive Officer (from May 1992) and Chairman of the Board (from August 2008) and brings to the position of Chairman a unique in-depth knowledge of our Company and the regulated waste industry generally, together with a repeatedly proven ability to formulate and oversee the implementation of strategic initiatives. Moreover, our Chairman’s substantial ownership stake in our Company provides alignment with the interests of his fellow stockholders.

Mr. Schuler served as our Chairman of the Board from January 1990 until becoming Lead Director in August 2008 and brings to the position of Lead Director experience managing the operations of a multinational healthcare company and knowledge of the dynamics of the healthcare industry.

Our Lead Director’s duties are substantially similar to many of the duties typically performed by a chairman of the board. As described in “Item 1 Election of Directors—Lead Director” on page 13, the Lead Director is responsible for coordinating with the Chairman of the Board the scheduling and agenda of Board meetings and the preparation and distribution of agenda materials. The Lead Director may also call special meetings of the Board of Directors when he considers it appropriate. In general, the Lead Director oversees the scope, quality and timeliness of the flow of information from our management to the Board and serves as an independent point of contact for stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board other than through the Chairman of the Board.

Eight of ten of our directors are independent, and the Board regularly reviews the Company’s governance to ensure independent oversight of management. In addition to the requirement to empower a Lead Director when the Chairman of the Board is not independent, examples of independent oversight include the following:

 

All membersWith the increases phased in over the 2015-2017 period, base salaries for the majority of our NEOs are in line with the median for our peer group. For 2019, the Compensation Committee engaged its compensation consultant to conduct an independent review of executive officer salaries, as it had been several years since the last such review. After considering the results of the Audit, independent review, the

Compensation Committee approved salary increases for two of our executive officers and Nominatinga cash incentive target increase for one executive officer, to be effective January 1, 2019. See “Our Executive Compensation Program for 2019”. The remaining executive officers did not receive increases to base compensation or to cash incentive targets for 2019.

Annual Cash Performance Bonuses

Our annual cash performance bonus program is intended to reward our executive officers for achieving our annual operating plans and Governance Committeesbudgets. Each executive officer is eligible for an annual cash performance bonus equal to a specified percentage of base salary.

Our executive officers earn annual cash performance bonuses based upon the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA

targets developed from our annual operating plan and budget and Adjusted ROIC targets.

As a result, 70% of each NEO’s 2018 annual cash performance bonus was tied to achievement of our Adjusted EBITDA goal and 30% was tied to achievement of our Adjusted ROIC goal.

Performance Goals for 2018

Based upon our annual business plans, the Compensation Committee established minimum, target, and maximum achievement levels for the Adjusted EBITDA portion of the Board are independent. As provided in their charters, these committees have oversight responsibilities over critical mattersannual cash performance bonus.

For 2018, the Adjusted EBITDA target was $800 million. There was no payout for the Company and play a robust role in the Company’s governance, with direct accessthis metric if we failed to management and authority to retain independent advisers. The oversight responsibilitiesattain Adjusted EBITDA of these committees include the quality and integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the performance and compensation of executive officers, the nomination of directors,$752 million, and the evaluationpayout for performance at or above the maximum goal of $840 million was capped at 200%.

As with the Adjusted EBITDA portion of the effectivenessbonus, the Compensation Committee fixed minimum, target, and maximum Adjusted ROIC performance goals and related payout percentages. For 2018, the Adjusted ROIC target was 8.00%. There was no payout for this metric if we failed to attain the minimum Adjusted ROIC of 6.96%, and the payout for performance at or above the maximum goal of 9.04% was capped at 200%.

The following table shows how different levels of actual Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted ROIC were designed to affect the payout.

   

Adjusted EBITDA

Cash Bonus Program for 2018

70% Total Cash Bonus

   

Adjusted ROIC

Cash Bonus Program for 2018

30% Total Cash Bonus

 
    

Percentage of

Award Payout

   

Percent Adjusted

EBITDA
Attainment

   

Adjusted EBITDA

Target (in $ millions)

   

Percentage of

Award Payout

   

Adjusted

ROIC Target

 

Minimum

  

 

50%

 

  

 

94%

 

  

 

$ 752

 

  

 

50%

 

  

 

6.96%

 

Target

  

 

100%

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

800

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

8.00%

 

Maximum

  

 

200%

 

  

 

105% or more

 

  

 

840 or more

 

  

 

200%

 

  

 

9.04% or more

 

Both sets of performance targets allow for payout of the Board, its committees and its members.annual cash performance bonuses at levels that increase proportionally from the minimum tier (an annual cash

performance bonus equal to the specified percentage of the executive officer’s base salary) to the maximum.

 

2016Proxy Statement34  Stericycle, Inc. • 42 - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Compensation Program Highlights

For 2018, the annual cash performance bonus percentages for our named executive officers were as follows:

    Base Salary   

Cash Performance

Bonus Percentage

 

Mr. Alutto

  

$

1,000,000

 

  

 

100%

 

Ms.  Miller(1)

  

 

625,000

 

  

 

 

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

550,000

 

  

 

75%

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

400,000

 

  

 

60%

 

Ms. Abdulmassih

  

 

370,000

 

  

 

65%

 

Mr. Arnold

  

 

550,000

 

  

 

75%

 

Ms. Frank(2)

  

 

400,000

 

  

 

60%

 

(1)

Ms. Miller was not eligible for a 2018 cash performance bonus.


(2)

Ms. Frank did not receive a 2018 cash performance bonus due to her resignation in November, 2018.

ITEM 5 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON INDEPENDENT CHAIRMANPerformance Results for 2018

Our Adjusted EBITDA for 2018 for purposes of the annual cash performance bonus program was $727 million and was below threshold. Our Adjusted ROIC performance in 2018 for purposes of the annual cash performance bonus program was 7.59% or 95.1% of target. These performance results resulted in an annual cash bonus payout equal to 24.2% of target, as illustrated below:

LOGO

0% Adjusted EBITDA Payout x 70% 80.6% Adjusted ROIC Payout x 30% 24.2% Performance Bonus Payout Percentage

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

 

 

AtThe Compensation Committee’s first step when making long-term equity incentive awards is to determine the desired total grant date fair value of each regularly scheduled meetingNEO’s award in the manner described above under “Our Compensation-Setting Process.” For 2018, 1/3 of that total amount was

awarded in the form of stock options, 1/3 of that total amount was awarded in the form of time-based RSUs and the remaining 1/3 was awarded in the form of performance-based RSUs.

Stock Option Grants for 2018

Until 2016, executive officers’ long-term incentive awards were entirely in the form of stock options. With the addition of time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs to the long-term incentive program, stock options constituted approximately one third of our NEOs’ long-term compensation in 2018.

The Compensation Committee believes stock options provide strong performance incentives. Our stock options are always granted at the closing price of our common stock on the date of the Board,grant.

Stock options vest over a period of five years and must be exercised within eight or ten years, depending on the terms of the grant. The value of stock options depends entirely on the growth in the value of our common stock in the years after the options are issued. Accordingly, the executive officers’ stock options provide an incentive for sustained levels of superior performance that contribute to our overall success as reflected in the market price of our common stock, which benefits all of our stockholders.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement35


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Compensation Program Highlights

The 2018 stock option awards for our named executive officers were as follows:

    

Number of

Stock
Options

   

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

Mr. Alutto

  

 

76,509

 

  

$

1,289,942

 

Ms. Miller

  

 

60,391

 

  

 

894,995

 

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

28,605

 

  

 

482,280

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

14,485

 

  

 

244,217

 

Ms. Abdulmassih

  

 

13,905

 

  

 

234,438

 

Mr. Arnold

  

 

28,605

 

  

 

482,280

 

Ms. Frank

  

 

14,979

 

  

 

252,546

 

Time-based Restricted Stock Units for 2018

Time-based RSUs constituted approximatelyone-third of our NEO’s long-term incentive compensation in 2018, and their use is consistent with the pay practices of our peers. The number of RSUs awarded to an NEO is determined based

on the target grant date fair value of the NEO’s total equity award. The time-based RSUs granted to executive officers in 2018 vest in equal annual installments over five years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

During 2018, the Compensation Committee granted time-based RSU awards to our named executive officers as follows:

    

Time-based

Restricted

Stock Units

   

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

Mr. Alutto

  

 

19,127

 

  

$

1,186,639

 

Ms. Miller

  

 

11,159

 

  

 

566,654

 

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

7,151

 

  

 

443,648

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

3,621

 

  

 

224,647

 

Ms. Abdulmassih

  

 

3,476

 

  

 

215,651

 

Mr. Arnold

  

 

7,151

 

  

 

443,648

 

Ms. Frank

  

 

3,744

 

  

 

232,278

 

36Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Compensation Program Highlights

Performance-based Restricted Stock Units for 2018

Performance-based RSUs are the finalone-third of our NEO’s long-term incentive compensation and are also aligned with our peer group’s long-term incentive pay practices. The number of performance-based RSUs awarded to an NEO is determined based on the target grant date fair

value of the NEO’s total equity award. Performance-based RSUs granted to executive officers vest, if at all, in equal installments over three years, depending on achievement during each year of the applicable annual EPS performance goal.

During 2018, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based RSU awards to our named executive officers as follows:

    

Performance-based

Restricted

Stock Units

   

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

Mr. Alutto

  

 

19,127

 

  

$

395,546

 

Ms. Miller

  

 

15,778

 

  

 

255,555

 

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

7,151

 

  

 

147,883

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

3,621

 

  

 

74,882

 

Ms. Abdulmassih

  

 

3,476

 

  

 

71,884

 

Mr. Arnold

  

 

7,151

 

  

 

147,883

 

Ms. Frank

  

 

3,744

 

  

 

77,426

 

The Company began the practice of granting performance-based RSUs in 2017. The first performance period ended December 31, 2017 and no performance-based RSUs were earned for that period. The second performance period ended December 31, 2018 and 43% of the first tranche of the performance-based RSUs granted in 2018 and 43% of the second tranche of the performance-based RSUs granted in 2017 were earned.

Similar to 2017, the Compensation Committee established minimum and maximum achievement levels with respect to the 2018 Adjusted EPS goal of $4.42 and $4.65,

respectively. Performance in between these two points is interpolated on a straight-line basis to determine the vesting of shares. No performance-based RSUs vest if we failed to attain a minimum Adjusted EPS of $4.42, and the payout for performance at or above 98% of the target of $4.65 is capped at 100%.

Our Adjusted EPS for 2018 for purposes of the performance-based RSU program was $4.45 or 95.7% of target, resulting in the vesting of 43% for the applicable tranches of the 2017 and 2018 performance-based RSU grants.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Executive Compensation Program for 2019

Our Executive Compensation Program for 2019

Compensation Program for 2019

We did not make any changes to the base salaries or cash bonus targets for the NEOs with respect to 2018. After conducting a market analysis with our independent directors meetadvisor during 2018, we made several changes to our compensation programs for 2019. At an individual level, we made salary adjustments for Mr. Rogers and Mr. Ginnetti and a bonus target change for Mr. Rogers to align their pay more closely with the market. These changes were effective January 1, 2019.

We also redesigned our equity program to better align with market practices, including changes in the vesting schedule and grant amounts and the addition of a retirement provision which extends the option exercise period for

employees who leave the company due to retirement. First, the vesting period for our stock option and RSU grants was changed for 2019 awards to three years (compared to our previous practice of five years). Second, because the grants are now vesting more quickly, grant amounts were reduced in order to align with the vesting period and market norms. Third, beginning with the 2019 awards, we added a retirement provision for stock option grants that allows retirees a period of up to 12 months to exercise any vested options upon termination instead of the usual 90 days. Retirees are defined as team members who leave Stericycle at age 65, or age 55 or greater with at least 10 years of service.

We believe these changes made in 2019 are consistent with our compensation philosophy, which stresses that compensation for our NEOs (and for all other employees) must be performance-based, but also aligned with the median compensation amounts and pay practices awarded by our peers to ensure we can continue to attract and retain a consistent pipeline of high caliber talent. The equity awards granted in March 2018 and 2019 also provide for “double-trigger” vesting in connection with a change in control. Noted below is a summary of the changes for 2019.

Plan Impacted

Key ChangesReasons

Base salary

Most NEO salaries were unchanged compared to 2018 (two changes were made effective January 1, 2019)

To keep base salaries aligned with the median of our peer group

Annual cash bonus

Most NEO cash bonus opportunities were unchanged compared to 2018 (one change was made effective January 1, 2019)

To keep target cash compensation aligned with the median of our peer group and reflect company performance

Maintained metric weightings at 70% Adjusted EBITDA and 30% Adjusted ROIC

To maintain the emphasis on key metrics that represent Company performance

Stock options

Maintained the stock option component of the total long-term incentive award at one third

To continue to align management and stockholder interests by providing an incentive, the value of which depends entirely on the growth in the value of our common stock

Time-based RSUs

Maintained the time-based RSU component of the total long-term incentive award at one third

To allow for a balanced long-term incentive mix that is consistent with market norms

Performance-based RSUs

Maintained the performance-based RSU component of the long-term incentive award at one third.

Performance-based RSUs vest, or not, in three equal annual installments based on annual EPS performance goals

To maintain the rigor and stockholder focus of the long-term equity incentive program by tying a significant portion of the NEOs’ award to EPS

Peer group

No changes were made to the peer group

Peer group analysis showed that the current peer group, with changes made in 2017, is an appropriate benchmark for the Company

Vesting period and grant amounts for stock options and RSUs

Changed the vesting period for 2019 stock option and RSU grants to three years (compared to a previous practice of five years) and reduced grant amounts accordingly

To align more closely with market practices and offer an equity program that is competitive with the market without increasing overall expense

Retirement provision for stock option exercise period

Added a retirement provision for stock option grants that allows retirees a period of up to 12 months to exercise any vested options upon termination instead of the usual 90 days

To align more closely with market practices and offer an equity program that is competitive with the market without increasing overall expense

38Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Executive Compensation Program for 2019

Currently, performance-based RSUs vest ratably over a three-year period with performance goals for each tranche set annually according to each year’s business plan. Due to the business transformation and portfolio rationalization initiatives that the Company has undertaken, the annual goal-setting process has been necessary to achieve alignment between the performance targets and the annual business plan. Beginning in 2020, the Committee expects to recommend that performance-based RSUs vest at the end of a three year performance period, rather than ratably throughout the three-year period. Further, the Committee intends to change the goal-setting process from an annual

process to an approach which incorporates a three year measurement period for the chosen metric.

The Committee did not implement any changes in executive session, presided over by the Lead Director, to review the performance of management and in particular the performance of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chairmancompensation during 2018 as a direct result of the Board.stockholders’ advisory vote. The most recent vote regarding “say on pay” for our executive compensation program indicated that our stockholders support the Compensation Committee’s strategy of awarding competitive compensation featuring rigorous performance-based incentive opportunities. During the 2018 “say on pay vote,” we received 90.0% support (or 89.8%, including abstentions) “for” the executive compensation program.

2019 Executive Compensation Plans

 

In addition,order to maintain competitiveness with the market but reflect our directors annually reviewcompany’s overall performance, the Committee approved compensation plans for our NEOs that included increases in base salary for Mr. Ginnetti and Mr. Rogers, an increase in the cash performance incentive for Mr. Rogers, and a three-part equity program. The compensation plans for our named executive officers in 2019 are as follows (no information is given for those executives who are no longer employed by the Company):

    Base Salary   Cash Performance
Bonus Percentage
   Granted
Stock Options
   Granted
Performance-Based RSUs
   Granted
Time-based RSUs
 

 

Mr. Alutto

  

 

 

 

$1,000,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

100%

 

 

      

 

Ms. Miller(1)

  

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

90%

 

 

  

 

 

 

41,417

 

 

  

 

 

 

12,005

 

 

  

 

 

 

12,005

 

 

 

Mr. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

575,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

75%

 

 

  

 

 

 

24,654

 

 

  

 

 

 

7,146

 

 

  

 

 

 

7,146

 

 

 

Mr. Rogers

  

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

70%

 

 

  

 

 

 

16,567

 

 

  

 

 

 

4,802

 

 

  

 

 

 

4,802

 

 

(1)

Ms. Miller’s compensation as Chief Executive Officer has not yet been determined. When such compensation has been finally determined, the Company will make a public announcement, by means of an amendment to a Current Report on Form 8-K or otherwise.

Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan

Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors adopted a plan for executive severance, including following a change in control. The plan, which went into effect on September 1, 2016, applies to all the named executive officers. Stericycle introduced this plan in order to be competitive with the market and its committeesenhance retention.

Under the plan, named executive officers are entitled to benefits in the event of a termination of employment by us other than for “Cause”, “Death” or “Disability” (as each is defined in the plan). A covered executive will receive the following benefits so long as the executive executes and honors a full waiver and release of claims against Stericycle, as well asnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality and other restrictive covenants that we may deem necessary to protect our interests:

An amount equal to the actual annual incentive the executive would have been paid had the executive remained employed on the payment date applicable to then current employees, prorated based on the executive’s period of service through the executive’s termination date.
An amount equal to the sum of the executives’ base salary and target annual incentive, each determined as of the termination date, multiplied by the applicable “severance multiple.”

For the Chief Executive Officer, the severance multiple is two.

For all other executives, the severance multiple is one.

Non-qualified deferred compensation benefits and employee welfare benefits pursuant to the terms of the applicable plans and policies.

Payment of or reimbursement for the cost of COBRA premiums in connection with the executive’s medical, vision, prescription and dental coverage in effect as of the date of termination, to the extent such premiums exceed the premiums paid for similar provided coverage by active employees, for up to twenty-four months.

Reimbursement for outplacement benefits up to $25,000.

For involuntary termination (other than for “Cause”) associated with a change in control, which includes voluntary termination for “Good Reason” (as defined in the plan)

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Other Compensation Matters

within 24 months after a change in control, the benefits above remain in place but the annual incentive payment and the severance multiple changes, as follows:

An amount equal to the executive’s target annual incentive, prorated based on the executive’s period of service through the executive’s termination date.

An amount equal to the sum of the executives’ base salary and target annual incentive, each determined as of the

termination date, multiplied by the applicable “severance multiple.”

For the Chief Executive Officer, the severance multiple is three.

For all other executives, the severance multiple is two.

In situations involving voluntary termination other than for Good Reason during the24-month post-change period or termination for cause, we would only be required to pay accrued obligations to the employee.

Other Compensation Matters

Retirement Plans and Deferred Compensation Arrangements

Our Board of Directors adopted the Stericycle, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan effective for deferrals of compensation on and after April 1, 2017. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the plan. The Plan is unfunded and designed to be a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Under the Plan, a bookkeeping account will be created for each participant. Each year, we will credit a participant’s account with the designated portion of the participant’s compensation that the participant elected to defer for that year (the “Elective Deferral Contributions”) and may credit the participant’s account with a discretionary amount declared by us for that year (the “Company Discretionary Contributions”). Earnings on the credited amounts will be based on the performance of their fellow directorsvarious investment funds available under the Plan (and as directed by the participant).

The Plan permits participants to ensureelect to receive distributions, which generally become payable upon a

termination of employment or a specified date prior to termination of employment, in either a lump sum or in installments over a period of up to fifteen years. All distributions from the Plan are in cash. The participant will always be fully vested in that portion of the Boardparticipant’s account attributable to the Elective Deferral Contributions, and Board committees are functioning effectively.will be vested in Company Discretionary Contributions, if any, five years from the date the first Company Discretionary Contribution is credited to the participant’s account, subject to the participant’s continued service. Vesting will be accelerated upon a participant’s termination of service due to death or disability or a change in control while the participant is still in service.

The unvested portion of a participant’s account will generally be forfeited upon termination of employment. A participant’s vested interests under the Plan will be forfeited upon a termination of employment for Cause (as defined in the Plan).

Perquisites and Personal Benefits

 

We believeprovide limited perquisites and personal benefits to our executive officers. See “2018 Summary Compensation Table – All Other Compensation” and the corporate governance measures noted above demonstrate that our Board is structured effectively to exercise independent oversight. In addition, the Company’s stockholders have considered, and declined to provide majority support to, a similar independent board chairman proposal at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.related footnotes.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

For

All of our executive officers andnon-employee directors are expected to hold a minimum position in our common stock. We established this program to help align the foregoing reasons, a policy that requires an independent chairman is unnecessary and not in the bestlong-term interests of our stockholders.

executive officers andAccordingly, the Boardnon-employee directors with those of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.our stockholders.

 

2016Proxy StatementStock Ownership Guideline

Chief Executive Officer

Four times his or her annual base salary

Other NEOs

Three times their respective annual base salaries

Non-Employee Directors

Four times their respective annual cash retainers

40  Stericycle, Inc. • 43 - 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Other Compensation Matters

Although there is no specific period of time in which the executive officers andnon-employee directors are required to achieve the applicable ownership threshold, they are expected to make continuous progress toward that goal, and to comply with the following retention ratios until such guidelines have been achieved:

The CEO must hold 75% of the net shares acquired upon the vesting or exercise of any equity awards (“Net Profit Shares”) until the minimum position requirement has been achieved; and

The other NEOs must hold 50% of their respective Net Profit Shares until the minimum position requirement has been achieved.

Thenon-employee directors must retain 75% of their Net Profit Shares until the minimum position requirement has been achieved.

Shares that will count toward achievement of the stock ownership guidelines include:

Shares owned outright (including employee stock purchase plan shares and securities convertible into shares of common stock on anas-converted basis) by the executive officer or director or any of such person’s immediate family members residing in the same household;
Shares held in trust for the benefit of the executive officer or director or such person’s family;

Shares held in our employee benefit plans, including the 401(k) Savings Plan;

Shares obtained through stock option exercises and thein-the-money value of vested and unvested stock options; and

Shares of unvested restricted stock and RSUs.

Compliance with these stock ownership guidelines is measured periodically by our internal team responsible for handling executive compensation matters, and the results of such measurement are reported to the Compensation Committee at least once per year. On each measurement date, compliance is measured using each executive officer’s base salary then in effect, and the average trailing180-day trading price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on such date. Once an executive officer has achieved the applicable ownership threshold, that person will be considered in compliance, regardless of any change in the price of our common stock, so long as such person continues to own at least the number of shares of our common stock and other awards owned at the time of achieving that threshold.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging; Clawbacks

See “Corporate Governance – Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy” and “Clawback Policy” for a discussion of Company policies with respect to these matters.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement41


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s executive management. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

Thomas D. Brown, Chairman

Lynn D. Bleil

Thomas F. Chen

Stephen C. Hooley

Mike S. Zafirovski

42Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes the compensation paid or earned for the fiscal years noted in the table by our named executive officers:

Name and Principal   Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Option
Awards(1)
($)
  Stock
Awards(2)
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
($)
  All Other
Compensations(4)
($)
  Total
($)
 

 

Charles A. Alutto

President and Chief
Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,289,942

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,582,185

 

 

 

 

$

 

241,800

 

 

 

 

$

 

5,693

 

 

 

 

$

 

4,119,620

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

$

1,000,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,317,342

 

 

$

1,495,299

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,000

 

 

$

3,815,641

 

 

 

2016

 

 

$

585,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,136,579

 

 

$

780,840

 

 

$

112,978

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

3,617,397

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

President and Chief
Operating Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

156,250

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

894,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

822,209

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

33,526

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,906,980

 

 

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

482,280

 

 

 

 

$

 

591,531

 

 

 

 

$

 

99,743

 

 

 

 

$

 

3,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,726,554

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

489,363

 

 

$

555,444

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,000

 

 

$

1,597,807

 

 

 

2016

 

 

$

380,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

903,940

 

 

$

330,249

 

 

$

48,925

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

1,665,114

 

                                

 

Kurt M. Rogers

Executive Vice President and
General Counsel

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

244,217

 

 

 

 

$

 

299,529

 

 

 

 

$

 

58,032

 

 

 

 

$

 

3,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,004,778

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

370,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

327,541

 

(5) 

 

 

$

 

234,438

 

 

 

 

$

 

287,535

 

 

 

 

$

 

58,153

 

 

 

 

$

 

26,681

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,304,348

 

 

Executive Vice President,

Communications and
Related Services

 

 

2017

 

 

$

370,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

234,882

 

 

$

266,608

 

 

$

 

 

$

41,579

 

 

$

913,069

 

        
                                

 

Joseph B. Arnold

Former Executive Vice
President and Chief
Operating Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

482,280

 

 

 

 

$

 

591,531

 

 

 

 

$

 

99,743

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,012,005

 

 

 

 

$

 

2,735,559

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

489,363

 

 

$

555,444

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,000

 

 

$

1,597,807

 

 

 

2016

 

 

$

380,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

903,940

 

 

$

330,249

 

 

$

48,925

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

1,665,114

 

                                

 

Brenda R. Frank

Former Executive Vice
President and Chief
People Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

367,692

 

 

 

 

$

 

198,616

 

(6) 

 

 

$

 

252,546

 

 

 

 

$

 

309,704

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

19,571

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,148,129

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

254,462

 

 

$

288,835

 

 

$

 

 

$

18,113

 

 

$

961,410

 

 

 

2016

 

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

775,000

(7) 

 

$

279,402

 

 

$

389,908

 

 

$

31,383

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,800,693

 

                                
(1)

The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016. We calculated these amounts in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, utilizing the assumptions discussed in Note 13 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, Note 12 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and in Note 6 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

(2)

The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant. The grant date fair value of time-based RSUs granted in 2018 and performance-based RSUs granted in 2018 are as follows:

  Name  Time-Based RSUs   Performance-Based RSUs   

 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

 

 

$1,186,639

 

 

  

 

 

 

$395,546

 

 

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

 

 

566,654

 

 

  

 

 

 

255,555

 

 

 

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

443,648

 

 

  

 

 

 

147,883

 

 

 

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

 

 

224,647

 

 

  

 

 

 

74,882

 

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

 

 

215,651

 

 

  

 

 

 

71,884

 

 

 

 

Joseph B. Arnold

  

 

 

 

443,648

 

 

  

 

 

 

147,883

 

 

 

 

Brenda R. Frank

  

 

 

 

232,278

 

 

  

 

 

 

77,426

 

 

 

Because the performance-related component of the performance-based RSUs is based on separate measurements of our performance for each year in the three-year performance cycle, FASB ASC Topic 718 requires the grant date fair value to be calculated with respect toone-third of the total performance-based RSUs in each year of the three-year performance cycle. For 2018, with respect to each of the named executive officers other than Ms. Miller, the grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs, as measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, is based on our closing stock price on the grant date of March 1, 2018 of $62.04 and the probable outcome of target performance of the annual performance-related component for 2018. With respect to Ms. Miller, the grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs is based on our closing stock price on the grant due of March 12, 2019 of $48.59. Such grant relates to Ms. Miller’s hiring in October 2018. With respect to the performance-based RSUs, target performance and maximum performance are the same.

(3)

The amounts shown represent the gross amounts of the named executive officer’s annual cash incentive for the applicable fiscal year.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement43


ITEM 6 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ENTITLED “SHAREHOLDER PROXY ACCESS”

2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

(4)

With respect to Mr. Alutto, represents $3,000 for 401(k) matching contributions and $2,693 spousal travel. With respect to Mr. Ginnetti and Mr. Rogers, represents only our matching 401(k) plan contributions for the fiscal years noted. With respect to Ms. Miller, represents $18,674 relocation expenses and $14,852 tax gross up. With respect to Mr. Arnold, represents $3,000 for 401(k) matching contributions and $1,009,005 payable pursuant to a separation agreement. With respect to Ms. Frank, represents $5,007 spousal travel and $14,564 for commuting and travel expenses reimbursed by the Company. With respect to Ms. Abdulmassih, represents $3,000 for 401(k) matching contributions and $23,681 for commuting and travel expenses reimbursed by the Company. With respect to such relocation, commuting and travel expenses, the aggregate incremental cost to our Company is determined by the amounts paid to third-party providers.

(5)

Represents bonuses paid to Ms. Abdulmassih in connection with certain special projects.

(6)

Represents a retention bonus and bonuses paid to Ms. Frank in connection with certain special projects.

(7)

Represents a bonus paid to Ms. Frank as part of the transition from her former employment agreement withShred-it.

44Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


2018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table provides information about the plan-based awards for our named executive officers during 2018.

     

Estimated Future Payouts Under 

 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) 

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under 

   Equity Incentive Plan  Awards(2) 

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(3)
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
$/Share
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards(5)
($)
 

Name

 Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

500,000

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

76,509

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

1,289,942

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

19,127

 

   

 

1,186,639

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

4,782

 

 

 

19,127

 

 

 

19,127

 

             

 

395,546

 

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

281,250

 

 

 

562,500

 

 

 

1,125,000

 

       
 

 

11/01/2018

 

        

 

60,391

 

 

 

50.78

 

 

 

894,995

 

 

 

11/01/2018

 

       

 

11,159

 

   

 

566,654

 

 

 

3/12/2019

 

             

 

3,945

 

 

 

15,778

 

 

 

15,778

 

             

 

255,555

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

206,250

 

 

 

412,500

 

 

 

825,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

28,605

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

482,280

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

7,151

 

   

 

443,648

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

1,788

 

 

 

7,151

 

 

 

7,151

 

             

 

147,883

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

120,000

 

 

 

240,000

 

 

 

480,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

14,485

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

244,217

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

3,621

 

   

 

224,647

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

905

 

 

 

3,621

 

 

 

3,621

 

             

 

74,882

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

120,250

 

 

 

240,500

 

 

 

481,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

13,905

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

234,438

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

3,476

 

   

 

215,651

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

869

 

 

 

3,476

 

 

 

3,476

 

             

 

71,884

 

Joseph B. Arnold

  

 

206,250

 

 

 

412,500

 

 

 

825,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

28,605

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

482,280

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

7,151

 

   

 

443,648

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

1,788

 

 

 

7,151

 

 

 

7,151

 

             

 

147,883

 

Brenda R. Frank

  

 

120,000

 

 

 

240,000

 

 

 

480,000

 

       
 

 

3/01/2018

 

        

 

14,979

 

 

 

62.04

 

 

 

252,546

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

       

 

3,744

 

   

 

232,278

 

 

 

3/01/2018

 

             

 

936

 

 

 

3,744

 

 

 

3,744

 

             

 

77,426

 

(1)

These amounts consist of the threshold, target and maximum cash award levels set in 2018 under the annual cash performance bonus program. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding the annual cash performance bonus program.

(2)

The amounts shown at target represent the aggregate number of performance-based RSUs that may be earned under the long-term incentive plan. The performance-based RSUs vest, if at all, in three annual installments based on annual EPS performance goals. The earnout percentage may range from 0% to 100% of the target performance-based RSUs granted, with a range of25%-100% earned at threshold to maximum performance. See “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards – Performance-based Restricted Stock Units for 2018” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

(3)

The amounts represent the time-based RSUs granted under the long-term incentive plan to the named executive officers. The time-based RSUs vest in equal annual installments over five years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, provided that the executive is still employed by the Company on the vesting date. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding these RSU grants.

(4)

These amounts represent stock options granted under the long-term incentive plan to the named executive officers. These options vest in equal annual installments over five years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, provided that the executive is still employed by the Company on the applicable vesting date. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding these stock option awards.

(5)

The grant date fair value of each time-based RSU award was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the closing stock price on the applicable grant date. Because the performance-related component of the performance-based RSUs is based on separate measurements of our performance for each year in the three-year performance cycle, FASB ASC Topic 718 requires the grant date fair value to be calculated with respect

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement45


2018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

toone-third of the total performance-based RSUs in each year of the three-year performance cycle. For 2018, the grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs, as measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, is based on our closing stock price on the grant date and the probable outcome of target performance of the annual performance-related component for 2018. With respect to the performance-based RSUs, target performance and maximum performance are the same. The grant date fair value of each option award was calculated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, utilizing the assumptions discussed in Note 13 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

46Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


2018 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

The following table provides information about the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2018.

Option Awards

      Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
   Option
Exercise
Price ($)
   Option
Expiration
Date(1)
       Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested(3)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested(4)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested(3)
 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

 

  

 

76,509

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

         
  

 

6,984

 

  

 

 

  

 

63.00

 

  

 

7/30/2020

 

         
  

 

31,890

 

  

 

 

  

 

85.00

 

  

 

2/8/2021

 

         
  

 

97,073

 

  

 

23,800

 

  

 

115.69

 

  

 

2/11/2022

 

         
  

 

60,000

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.24

 

  

 

2/13/2022

 

         
  

 

66,000

 

  

 

44,000

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2023

 

         
  

 

147,671

 

  

 

 

  

 

95.87

 

  

 

2/20/2023

 

         
  

 

1,873

 

  

 

 

  

 

115.69

 

  

 

2/11/2024

 

         
  

 

2,435

 

  

 

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2025

 

         
  

 

42,163

 

  

 

63,243

 

  

 

111.12

 

  

 

2/5/2024

 

         
  

 

1,007

 

  

 

 

  

 

115.54

 

  

 

2/26/2026

 

         
  

 

13,456

 

  

 

53,824

 

  

 

83.35

 

  

 

2/16/2025

 

         
  

 

341

 

  

 

 

  

 

82.93

 

  

 

2/24/2027

 

      

 

34,108

 

  

 

1,251,423

 

  

 

7,024

  

 

257,711

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

 

  

 

60,391

 

  

 

50.78

 

  

 

11/1/2026

 

      

 

11,159

 

  

 

409,423

 

          

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

  

 

28,605

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

         
  

 

12,000

 

  

 

 

  

 

51.55

 

  

 

2/9/2020

 

         
  

 

10,700

 

  

 

 

  

 

85.00

 

  

 

2/8/2021

 

         
  

 

12,000

 

  

 

3,000

 

  

 

115.69

 

  

 

2/11/2022

 

         
  

 

11,200

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.24

 

  

 

2/13/2022

 

         
  

 

6,000

 

  

 

1,500

 

  

 

116.81

 

  

 

8/1/2022

 

         
  

 

27,000

 

  

 

18,000

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2023

 

         
  

 

14,550

 

  

 

 

  

 

95.87

 

  

 

2/20/2023

 

         
  

 

17,838

 

  

 

26,757

 

  

 

111.12

 

  

 

2/5/2024

 

         
  

 

508

 

  

 

 

  

 

115.54

 

  

 

2/26/2026

 

         
  

 

4,999

 

  

 

19,994

 

  

 

83.35

 

  

 

2/16/2025

 

         
  

 

147

 

  

 

 

  

 

82.93

 

  

 

2/24/2027

 

      

 

12,934

 

  

 

474,548

 

  

 

2,621

  

 

96,164

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

2,399

 

  

 

9,596

 

  

 

76.41

 

  

 

7/24/2025

 

         
       

 

14,485

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

      

 

5,541

 

  

 

203,299

 

  

 

1,305

 

  

 

47,880

 

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement47


2018 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

Option Awards

      Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
UnExercisable
   Option
Exercise
Price ($)
   Option
Expiration
Date(1)
       Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested(2)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
That
Have Not
Vested(3)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested(4)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested(3)
 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

554

 

  

 

 

  

 

55.57

 

  

 

3/1/2020

 

         
  

 

8,700

 

  

 

 

  

 

85.00

 

  

 

2/8/2021

 

         
  

 

6,400

 

  

 

3,200

 

  

 

115.69

 

  

 

2/11/2022

 

         
  

 

8,700

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.24

 

  

 

2/13/2022

 

         
  

 

711

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.89

 

  

 

2/28/2022

 

         
  

 

2,000

 

  

 

 

  

 

85.57

 

  

 

4/11/2022

 

         
  

 

756

 

  

 

 

  

 

97.36

 

  

 

3/7/2023

 

         
  

 

7,200

 

  

 

7,200

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2023

 

         
  

 

9,700

 

  

 

1,939

 

  

 

95.87

 

  

 

2/20/2023

 

         
  

 

2,000

 

  

 

1,000

 

  

 

111.63

 

  

 

4/22/2022

 

         
  

 

1,192

 

  

 

 

  

 

136.285

 

  

 

3/5/2025

 

         
  

 

1,021

 

  

 

 

  

 

116.01

 

  

 

3/11/2026

 

         
  

 

2,400

 

  

 

9,596

 

  

 

83.35

 

  

 

2/16/2025

 

         
  

 

 

  

 

13,905

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

         
  

 

4,217

 

  

 

6,324

 

  

 

111.12

 

  

 

2/5/2024

 

      

 

6,268

 

  

 

229,973

 

  

 

1,269

 

  

 

46,560

 

Joseph B. Arnold

  

 

5,061

 

  

 

 

  

 

46.83

 

  

 

2/10/2019

 

         
  

 

404

 

  

 

 

  

 

47.24

 

  

 

3/2/2019

 

         
  

 

11,500

 

  

 

 

  

 

51.55

 

  

 

2/9/2020

 

         
  

 

792

 

  

 

 

  

 

55.57

 

  

 

3/1/2020

 

         
  

 

11,200

 

  

 

 

  

 

85.00

 

  

 

2/8/2021

 

         
  

 

629

 

  

 

 

  

 

83.88

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

         
  

 

12,000

 

  

 

3,000

 

  

 

115.69

 

  

 

2/11/2022

 

         
  

 

11,200

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.24

 

  

 

2/13/2022

 

         
  

 

711

 

  

 

 

  

 

86.89

 

  

 

2/28/2022

 

         
  

 

6,000

 

  

 

1,500

 

  

 

110.14

 

  

 

4/14/2022

 

         
  

 

27,000

 

  

 

18,000

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2023

 

         
  

 

14,550

 

  

 

 

  

 

95.87

 

  

 

2/20/2023

 

         
  

 

448

 

  

 

 

  

 

97.36

 

  

 

3/7/2023

 

         
  

 

337

 

  

 

 

  

 

130.19

 

  

 

2/6/2025

 

         
  

 

17,838

 

  

 

26,757

 

  

 

111.12

 

  

 

2/5/2024

 

         
  

 

508

 

  

 

 

  

 

115.54

 

  

 

2/26/2026

 

         
  

 

4,999

 

  

 

19,994

 

  

 

83.35

 

  

 

2/16/2025

 

         
  

 

147

 

  

 

 

  

 

82.93

 

  

 

2/24/2027

 

         
  

 

 

  

 

28,605

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

      

 

12,934

 

  

 

474,548

 

  

 

2,621

 

  

 

96,164

 

Brenda R. Frank

  

 

4,200

 

  

 

 

  

 

124.32

 

  

 

11/2/2023

 

         
  

 

5,514

 

  

 

 

  

 

111.12

 

  

 

2/5/2024

 

         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

62.04

 

  

 

3/1/2026

 

                        

48Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


2018 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

(1)

Other than options listed with expiration dates of February 11, 2022, April 14, 2022, February 5, 2024, November 2, 2023, and February 6, 2025 and February 24, 2027 which have8-year terms and expire on the eighth anniversary of the option grant date, these options have10-year terms and expire on the tenth anniversary of the option grant date. Options generally vest at the rate ofone-fifth (20%) of the option shares on each of the first five anniversaries of the option grant date.

(2)

Represents time-based RSUs that generally vest in 20% increments on each of the first through fifth year anniversaries of the date of grant.

(3)

Market value is based on the share price of $36.69 as of December 31, 2018.

(4)

The numbers shown represent performance-based RSUs, which vest, if at all, in three equal annual installments based on annual EPS performance goals. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown reflect the number of units that may be earned over the three-year period if the threshold level of EPS is achieved in each of the years.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement49


2018 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table summarizes information regarding stock options exercised by the named executive officers and restricted stock unit awards to the named executive officers that vested during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
   Value
Realized
Exercise
($)(1)
   Number of Shares
Acquired Upon
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
 

 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

 

 

27,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

237,211

 

 

  

 

 

 

4,096

 

 

  

 

 

 

303,931

 

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

        

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

234,450

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,593

 

 

  

 

 

 

117,952

 

 

 

Kurt M. Rogers

      

 

 

 

479

 

 

  

 

 

 

33,123

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

      

 

 

 

769

 

 

  

 

 

 

55,535

 

 

 

Joseph B. Arnold

      

 

 

 

1,593

 

 

  

 

 

 

117,952

 

 

 

Brenda R. Frank

            

 

 

 

702

 

 

  

 

 

 

52,396

 

 

(1)

Represents the difference between the market value of the shares acquired upon exercise and the aggregate exercise price of the shares acquired.

(2)

Represents the market value of the shares issued in settlement of RSU awards on the date of the awards vested, calculated using the closing sale price reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the vesting date.

50Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGEIN-CONTROL

The Board of Directors adopted a plan for executive severance, including but not limited to following a change in control, which went into effect on September 1, 2016. For further discussion of the executive severance plan, see “Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above.

Additionally, the Company’s long-term incentive plans and award agreements provide for the following treatment of awards:

Upon a change in control, stock options and time-based RSU awards will vest in full and performance-based RSU awards will vest at target level and any restrictions on shares underlying the awards shall lapse.

Upon a termination of employment due to death, stock options and time-based RSU awards will vest in full and performance-based RSU awards will vest at target level, without regard to satisfaction of performance targets. In the case of stock options, the vested portion of the option will expire upon the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the executive’s death or (ii) the option’s expiration date.

For terminations of employment other than by reason of death, any unvested portion of an award shall lapse and be canceled as of the executive’s termination date. In the case of stock options, the vested portion of the option will expire upon the earlier of (i) 90 days after the executive’s termination date or (ii) the option’s expiration date.

Payments upon a Termination Following a Change in Control

 Name

  Severance(1)   Pro-Rated
Annual
Incentive(2)
   Stock
Options(3)
   RSUs(4)   Continued
Welfare and
Other Benefits(5)
   Total 

 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

$

 

6,000,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

241,800

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

2,282,301

 

 

  

 

$

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

$

 

8,588,201

 

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

 

 

1,250,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

409,423

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,723,523

 

 

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

1,925,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

99,743

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

859,170

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

2,948,013

 

 

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

 

 

1,280,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

58,032

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

394,858

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,796,990

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

 

 

1,221,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

58,153

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

416,211

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,759,464

 

 

Payments upon a Termination other than for Cause, Disability or Death (Without a Change in Control)

 Name

  Severance(6)   Pro-Rated
Annual
Incentive(2)
   Stock
Options
   RSUs   Continued
Welfare and
Other Benefits(5)
   Total 

 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

$

 

4,000,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

241,800

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

$

 

4,305,900

 

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

689,100

 

 

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

962,500

 

 

  

 

 

 

99,743

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,126,343

 

 

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

 

 

640,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

58,032

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

762,132

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

 

 

610,500

 

 

  

 

 

 

58,153

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

64,100

 

 

  

 

 

 

732,753

 

 

(1)

In accordance with the Executive Severance andChange-in-Control Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”), amounts in this column represent severance payments equal to three times for Mr. Alutto and two times for the other named executive officers the sum of the executive officer’s base salary and target annual incentive

(2)

In accordance with the Executive Severance Plan, the executive will receive a prorated annual incentive for the year in which the termination occurs, calculated based on actual performance during the year.

(3)

Stock options will vest in full upon (i) a change in control regardless of a termination or (ii) death. The value shown for stock options is zero given that all unvested option shares that would vest following a change in control or death were granted at an option price higher than the closing stock price of $36.69 per share on December 31, 2018.

(4)

Time-based RSUs will vest in full and performance-based RSUs will vest at target level upon (i) a change in control regardless of a termination or (ii) death. The value shown for RSUs was determined by multiplying the closing stock price of $36.69 per share on December 31, 2018 by the number of unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs that would vest upon a change in control or death.

(5)

In accordance with the Executive Severance Plan, amounts in this column represent $25,000 in outplacement services plus approximately $39,100 for the continuation of medical, dental, and life insurance for a period of 24 months.

(6)

In accordance with the Executive Severance Plan, amounts in this column represent severance payments equal to two times for Mr. Alutto and one time for the other named executive officers the sum of the executive officer’s base salary and target annual incentive. We paid Mr. Arnold $1,009,005 with respect to his separation in 2018. We did not make any payments to Ms. Frank pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, in connection with her resignation in 2018.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement51


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGEIN-CONTROL

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

On February 28, 2019, in connection with Mr. Alutto’s May 2, 2019 retirement and resignation from his position as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board, respectively, the Company entered into a transition agreement with Mr. Alutto (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Alutto will receive, in addition to any accrued obligations: (i) continued payment of his current base salary through the date of his retirement; (ii) cash separation pay, payable in accordance with the Company’s Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan, equal to two times the sum of his base salary and target annual incentive for 2019; and(iii) pro-rata payment, through the date of his retirement, of his 2019 annual cash incentive, based on actual Company performance, payable in the first quarter of 2020. To ensure a smooth transition, Mr. Alutto will provide consulting services to the Company from the retirement date until July 31, 2019 (the “Consulting Period”), for which the Company will pay him $50,000 per month. In addition, pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Alutto will continue to vest, pro rata on a monthly basis during the Consulting Period, with respect to outstanding time-based RSUs and stock options, and with respect to outstanding performance-based RSUs, based on actual Company performance. Pursuant to the Agreement, the period for Mr. Alutto to exercise outstanding vested stock options is extended to May 2, 2020.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Our Board of Directors adopted the Stericycle, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan effective for deferrals of compensation on and after April 1, 2017. The Plan applies to directors, management and highly compensated employees of Stericycle, or an applicable Company subsidiary. The Plan is unfunded and designed to be a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Under the Plan, a bookkeeping account will be created for each participant. Each year, we will credit a participant’s account with the designated portion of the participant’s compensation that the participant elected to defer for that year (the “Elective Deferral Contributions”) and may credit the participant’s account with a discretionary amount declared by us for that year (the “Company Discretionary Contributions”). Participants may defer up to 80% of salary, bonus and commissions. Earnings on the credited amounts will be based on the performance of various investment funds available under the Plan (and as directed by the participant). Participants may change investment choices daily.

The Plan permits participants to elect to receive distributions, which generally become payable upon a termination of employment or a specified date prior to termination of employment, in either a lump sum or in installments over a period of up to fifteen years. All distributions from the Plan are in cash. The participant will always be fully vested in that portion of the participant’s account attributable to the Elective Deferral Contributions, and will be vested in Company Discretionary Contributions, if any, five years from the date the first Company Discretionary Contribution is credited to the participant’s account subject to the participant’s continued service. Vesting will be accelerated upon a participant’s termination of service due to death or disability or a change in control while the participant is still in service.

The unvested portion of a participant’s account will generally be forfeited upon termination of employment. A participant’s vested interests under the Plan will be forfeited upon a termination of employment for Cause.

The following table summarizes information with respect to the participation of the named executive officers in the Stericycle, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

 Name

  Executive
Contributions in
FY 2018 ($)(1)
   Stericycle
Contributions in
FY 2018 ($)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
FY 2018 ($)(2)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions in
FY 2018 ($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
12/31/18 ($)(3)
 

 

Charles A. Alutto

  

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1,358

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

16,499

 

 

 

Cindy J. Miller

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel V. Ginnetti

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kurt M. Rogers

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ruth-Ellen Abdulmassih

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joseph B. Arnold

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brenda R. Frank

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amount reported in this column is reported as “Salary” in the Summary Compensation Table for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

52Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGEIN-CONTROL

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

(2)

The amount reported in this column was not reported in the Summary Compensation Table as part of an individual’s compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

(3)

$7,308 was previously reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years.

In fiscal year 2018, the investment options available under the Supplemental Retirement Plan and their respective notional rates of return were as follows:

Deemed Investment Option

Fiscal

Year 2018
Cumulative
Return

American Balanced Fund

-2.42%

American Capital Income Builder

-6.74%

American Capital World Bond Fund

-1.11%

American Century Inflation Adjusted Bond Fund

-2.27%

American Growth Fund of America

-2.60%

American New Economy Fund

-3.92%

Blackrock High Yield Bond Fund

-2.76%

Columbia Midcap Index Fund

-11.35%

Columbia Quality Income Fund

1.95%

Columbia Small Cap Index Fund

-8.72%

Deutsche Real Estate Securities Fund

-3.08%

Eaton Vance Atlanta CapitalSMID-Cap Fund

-5.35%

Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund

-2.33%

Franklin Small Cap Value Fund

-12.30%

Invesco Comstock Fund

-11.88%

Invesco Equally Weighted S&P 500 Fund

-7.78%

Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio

-10.35%

Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund

-0.52%

Lord Abbett Income Fund

-2.41%

MFS International Value Fund

-8.89%

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund

1.10%

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund

-11.31%

Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund

-17.91%

Oppenheimer International Growth Fund

-19.22%

Retirement Reserves Money Fund

1.07%

Van Eck CM Commodity Index Fund

-11.13%

Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund

-14.27%

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement53


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGEIN-CONTROL

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

CEO Pay Ratio for 2018

We are required to disclose (i) the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO), (ii) the annual total compensation of our CEO, and (iii) the corresponding pay ratio.

We believe our pay ratio is a reasonable estimate, calculated in compliance with the requirements set forth in Item 6402(u) of RegulationS-K. We identified the median employee using our employee population as of December 1, 2017. The employee remained employed with Stericycle through December 31, 2018, and so we have used the same employee in our calculations for 2018. We are a global company with complex operations. As of our initial measurement date of December 1, 2017, we had 23,200 employees in over 21 countries. We have extremely small employee populations in some of these locations, which in the aggregate make up less than 5% of our total workforce. As a result, we excluded employee populations in the following locations when identifying the median employee at the end of 2017:

  Australia—61 employees

  Japan—100 employees

  Austria—1 employee

  Netherlands—35 employees

  Belgium—18 employees

  South Korea—316 employees

  France—91 employees

  Singapore—17 employees

  Germany—110 employees

  South Africa—64 employees

  Ireland—135 employees

  United Arab Emirates—24 employees

We used a consistently applied compensation measure across this employee population to identify the median employee. For our consistently applied compensation measure, we used base salary paid during 2017. The majority of our employees receive base salary (paid on an hourly, weekly, biweekly or monthly basis) and do not participate in any variable incentive plans. Consequently, base salary provides an accurate depiction of total earnings for the purpose of identifying our median employee. We then calculated the median employee’s annual total compensation in the same manner as the CEO in the Summary Compensation Table, except that for both the median employee compensation and CEO compensation we included $14,333.12 related to the Company’s portion of health care insurance premiums and company contributions to HSA accounts.

Our median employee compensation was $59,310.61. Our CEO compensation was $4,133,953.12. Accordingly, our CEO to median employee pay ratio is 70:1.

54Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 3    Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

In considering Ernst & Young’s appointment for the 2019 fiscal year, the Audit Committee reviewed the firm’s qualifications and competencies, including the following factors:

Ernst & Young’s historical performance and its recent performance during its engagement for the 2018 fiscal year;

Ernst & Young’s capability and expertise in handling engagements with the breadth and complexity of our operations, including its approach to resolving significant accounting and auditing matters and consultations with the firm’s national office;

The qualification and experience of key members of the engagement, including the lead audit partner;

The quality of Ernst & Young’s communication with the Audit Committee regarding the conduct of the audit and with respect to issues identified in the audit;

External data on audit quality and performance, including the most recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) reports on Ernst & Young and its peer firms;

The appropriateness of Ernst & Young’s fees, on both an absolute basis and as compared to its peer firms; and

Ernst & Young’s reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing.

Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 1991. The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with our Company’s retention of Ernst & Young LLP. In order to assure continued auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. In conjunction with the required rotation of Ernst & Young LLP’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chairman are directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young LLP’s new lead engagement partner. The current lead audit partner was appointed in 2016.

If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, our Board may reconsider its appointment.

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, as our independent registered public account firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. The members of the Audit Committee, and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement55


ITEM 3 RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019

Fees Paid to Independent Auditors

The following table shows the aggregate fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP by us for the services it rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Description of Fees

 

  

FY 2018

 

   

FY 2017

 

 

Audit Fees(1)

  

$

10,240,000

 

  

$

8,343,000

 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

  

 

1,005,000

 

  

 

1,750,000

 

Tax Fees(3)

  

 

510,700

 

  

 

191,000

 

All Other Fees(4)

  

 

2,300

 

  

 

7,000

 

TOTAL

  

$

11,758,000

 

  

$

10,291,000

 

(1)

Includes fees for the audits of annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, reviews of interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form10-Q, certain statutory audits and assistance with and review of certain documents and letters filed with the SEC. The increase in audit fees for 2018 compared to 2017 is primarily due to increased services provided relating to remediation of material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting.

(2)

Includes fees related to transaction audit and integration services.

(3)

Includes fees related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

(4)

Includes fees related to access to online research tools.

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies

In accordance with policies adopted by the Audit Committee, all audit andnon-audit related services to be performed for us by the independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. All of the services Ernst & Young performed for us during 2018 and 2017 werepre-approved by the Audit Committee.

56Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the qualifications and experience of the Company’s independent auditor, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditor, and the Company’s compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available on the Company’s investor relations website,http://investors.stericycle.com.The Audit Committee is comprised of three directors, all of whom are independent and two of whom (Brian P. Anderson, the Chairman, and Kay G. Priestly), have been determined by the Board of Directors to be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In regard to our role, we note that it is the responsibility of the Company’s management to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that it is the responsibility of the Company’s independent auditor to audit those financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight, and we do not provide expert or other special assurance regarding the Company’s financial statements or the quality of the audits performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

In carrying out our oversight responsibility, we review and discuss with both management and the independent auditor all quarterly and annual financial statements prior to their issuance. We reviewed and discussed with both management and the independent auditor the quarterly and annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Our reviews and discussions with the independent auditor included discussions of the matters required to be discussed pursuant to the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards, including among other items, the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the Company’s financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from management and the Company. The Audit Committee considered the compatibility ofnon-audit services with Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.

The Committee discussed with management significant risks and exposures identified by management, the internal auditors or Ernst & Young LLP, and management’s steps to address such risks.

In addition, we continued to monitor the scope and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, including staffing levels and requirements, and we reviewed programs and initiatives to strengthen the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and steps taken to implement recommended improvements.

The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, the Company, the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the accounting and financial controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee met individually with members of management in executive session. The Audit Committee held 15 meetings during fiscal year 2018.

The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, tenure and independence of the Company’s independent auditor and determines whether tore-engage the current independent auditor. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the auditors, the auditors’ global capabilities and the auditors’ technical expertise and knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has retained Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for 2019. Ernst & Young LLP has been the independent auditor for the Company since 1991. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that, due to Ernst & Young’s knowledge of the Company and of the industries in which the Company operates, it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to continue retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent auditor. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Audit Committee will continue to recommend that the Board of Directors ask the stockholders, at the Annual Meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent auditors.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee

Brian P. Anderson, Chairman

Veronica M. Hagen

Kay G. Priestly

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement57


ITEM 4    Stockholder Proposal Entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, a beneficial owner of no fewer than 50 shares of our common stock, has submitted the following resolution for consideration by stockholders:

Proposal 4 – Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Proposal [6]—Shareholder Proxy Access

RESOLVED: ShareholdersResolved, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders in the aggregate of directors10% of our outstanding common stock the power to adopt, and present for shareholder approval,call a “proxy access” bylaw as follows:special shareowner meeting (or the closest percentage to 10% according to state law). This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Require the Company to include in proxy materials prepared for a shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected the name, Disclosure and Statement (as defined herein) of any person nominated for election to the board by a shareholder or an unrestricted number of shareholders forming a group (the “Nominator”) that meets the criteria established below.

Allow shareholdersSpecial meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such nominee onas electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. This proposal topic won more than 70%-support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison in 2013.

Scores of Fortune 500 companies allow a more practical 10% of shares to call a special meeting compared to the Company’s proxy card.entrenchment requirement of Stericycle. SRCL shareholders do not have the full right to call a special meeting that is available under state law.

In fact we now have a sad joke of a right to call a special meeting.

At Stericycle it would take 25% of shares (instead of 10%) and then all shares held for less than one continuous year would be disqualified. Thus in order to obtain the 25% requirement it could take the holders of 51% of SRCL shares (minus perhaps 26% of shares that were held for less than one continuous year) to obtain the 25% that representedone-year of continuous holdings. In other words it could take 51% of shares to go to the onerous trouble to initiate a special meeting in which the same 51% of shares could take action.

The number2018 version of shareholder-nominated candidates appearingthis proposal received 43% support. The support would have been higher if all shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

A more practical shareholder right to call a special meeting would put shareholders in proxy materials should not exceed one quartera better position to ask for improvements in our board of the directors then serving or two, whicheverdirectors.

For instance, Mark Miller had long-tenure of 26-years. Long-tenure can seriously erode director independence. Independence is greater. This bylaw should supplement existing rights under Company bylaws, providing that a Nominator must:

a) have beneficially owned 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, including recallable loaned stock, continuously for at least three years before submitting the nomination;

b) give the Company, within the time period identifiedpriceless attribute in its bylaws, written notice of the information required by the bylaws and any Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules about (i) the nominee, including consent to being named in proxy materials and to serving as a director if elected; and (ii)from a shareholder perspective. Mr. Miller received 19% in negative votes compare to another Stericycle director who received 3% in negative votes.

Other directors with excessive negative votes included:

Brian Anderson (25%)

Charles Allutto (CEO – 14%)

Thomas Brown (16%)

Thomas Chen (45%)

In the Nominator, including proof it owns the required shares (the “Disclosure”); and

c) certify that (i) it will assume liability stemming from any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the Nominator’s communications with the Company shareholders, including the Disclosure and Statement; (ii) it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations if it uses soliciting material other than the Company’s proxy materials; and (iii)year leading up to the bestdue date for this proposal Stericycle stock fell from $66 to $47. Meanwhile there is a long-term problem with fraud:

A $295 million settlement was reached on behalf of its knowledge,a nationwide class of Stericycle customers, following a class-action lawsuit accusing the required shares were acquiredcompany of engaging in the ordinary course of business, not to change or influence control at the Company.

The Nominator may submit with the Disclosure a statement not exceeding 500 words in support of the nominee (the “Statement”). The Board should adopt procedures for promptly resolving disputes over whether notice of termination was timely, whether the Disclosure and Statement satisfy the bylaw and applicable federal regulations, and the priority given to multiple nominations exceeding the one-quarter limit. No additional restrictionsprice-increasing scheme that do not apply to other board nominees should be placed on these nominations or re-nominations.

Proxy access would “benefit both the markets and corporate boardrooms, with little cost or disruption,” raising US market capitalization byautomatically inflated customers’ bills up to $140 billion. This is according18% biannually, November 2018.

Stericycle agreed to pay $26 million to settle a cost-benefit analysis bylawsuit claiming it engaged in years of fraudulent price increases to school districts, police departments and municipalities in 12 states, October 2015.

A more practical shareholder right to call a special meeting would put shareholders in a better position to demand that the Chartered Financial Analyst Institute,Proxy Access in the United States: Revisiting the Proposed SEC Rule.Board seek directors with better skills and ethics.

Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement – Proposal 4

 

2016Proxy Statement58  Stericycle, Inc. • 44 - 2019 Proxy Statement


ITEM 64 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ENTITLED “SHAREHOLDER PROXY ACCESS”

 

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Shareholder Proxy Access—Proposal [6]

THE COMPANY’S STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

Having already implemented proxy access, theThe Board of Directors believes thathas again carefully considered this proposal is unnecessary and is not in the best interests of our stockholders. Consequently, the Board recommends a vote “AGAINST”believes this proposal.

We have already taken action to provide stockholders with proxy access. The stockholder proposal conflicts in some respects with the form of proxy access adopted by the Board. The proxy access provisions adopted by the Board, in addition to our pre-existing governance structures and policies, protect the Company, best serve the interests of stockholders, and are consistent with market practice and other S&P 500 companies.

The Board has already adopted proxy access for the benefit of all stockholders.

The Board has recently adopted an amendment and restatement of the Company’s bylaws to incorporate proxy access provisions that are consistent in some respects with the proxy access provisions proposed by the proponent, but are further tailored to the Company’s particular circumstances and governance practices. The Board considered various potential formulations of proxy access, including the provisions advocated by the proponent, taking into account the composition of our stockholders and the size, tenure and structure of our Board. Based upon the Board’s assessment of the relative advantages and disadvantages to the stockholders and the Company of the various proxy access formulations, in February 2016, the Board amended the bylaws to implement proxy access in the form it believes is most appropriate for the Company and its stockholders.

Under the amendment and restatement of the bylaws adopted by the Board, any stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that beneficially owns 3% or more of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least three years is permitted to nominate candidates for election to the Board and to require the Company to list nominees along with the Board’s nominees in the Company’s proxy materials for an annual meeting of stockholders; provided that the stockholder (or group) and each nominee satisfy certain requirements specified in the bylaws. The eligible stockholder or group of stockholders may nominate director candidates constituting up to the greater of two or 20% of the Board seats under the proxy access provisions adopted by our Board.

In contrast, the stockholder proposal contemplates proxy access for up to one quarter of the Board, unlimited aggregation of stockholders to satisfy the ownership requirement and inadequate procedural safeguards. The Board believes that the terms of the proxy access right under our bylaws strike a more appropriate balance in providing long-term, significant stockholders the opportunity to include nominees in our proxy materials, while limiting the risk that proxy access could lead to unnecessary expense and management distraction and enable special interest groups to disrupt our Board composition and corporate strategy in furtherance of an agenda that may not be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders generally.

The stockholder proposal fails to address several important considerations relevant to proxy access.

Among other things, the stockholder proposal fails to address requirements for the independence of stockholder nominees, which is required under our form of proxy access. The stockholder proposal also does not require a nominating stockholder or stockholder group to hold full voting and investment rights and the full economic interest (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss) with regard to their shares. In addition, the stockholder proposal fails to address the treatment of borrowed shares in the share ownership requirements. Absent a requirement for the nominating stockholder to retain voting power and investment power with respect to the shares one must own to establish eligibility to nominate a director, a stockholder could have a net short position on our common stock and still be entitled to use proxy access to make a nomination. Our form of proxy access implements these requirements and also excludes borrowed shares from

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 45


ITEM 6 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ENTITLED “SHAREHOLDER PROXY ACCESS”

being counted as part of the share ownership requirements. The Board believes that proxy access should be structured to require a sustained commitment to the Company in terms of the stockholder’s ownership interest and holding period, consistent with our focus on managing the business for long-term value.

Further, the stockholder proposal does not require nominating stockholders to retain ownership of their shares through the meeting date. A nominating stockholder could sell all or any portion of the required shares prior to the meeting date, potentially creating misalignment between the interests of the nominating stockholder and other stockholders. The proxy access provisions adopted by the Board require a nominating stockholder or group to hold the requisite shares through the date of the annual meeting.

The Board believes that proxy access without reasonable limits could detract from the effectiveness of the Board and thus adversely affect our financial and operational performance. We believe that our form of proxy access as adopted by the Board places reasonable limits on and requirements related to the use of proxy access, which are in the best interests of our stockholders.

The Company’s existing corporate governance structures ensure that the Board is accountable to stockholders, and stockholders already have several avenues to influence and voice their opinions to the Board.

In considering the proxy access stockholder proposal, the Board encourages stockholders to consider proxy access in the context of other provisions already included in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and other practices and policies that promote engagement with our stockholders and accountability of management and the Board to our investors. In addition to the proxy access provisions already in our bylaws, these include:

Annual election of all directors;

Majority vote standard for the election of directors (plurality vote in contested elections);

Any stockholder may nominate directors pursuant to the Company’s advance notice provisions of the bylaws and solicit proxies for director nominees under federal proxy rules;

Any stockholder may submit proposals for consideration at the Company’s annual meeting and for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement, subject to certain conditions and SEC rules;

Stockholders may submit nominations of director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee;

Each stockholder may express their views on our executive compensation program through our annual non-binding “say-on-pay” vote;

All but two of our directors are independent under NASDAQ listing standards;

Our Lead Director position ensures that there are processes in place for robust and independent Board oversight;

There are no supermajority voting requirements in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws;

There is no “poison pill;” and

Stockholders may communicate directly with the Board generally, the Executive Chairman of the Board or Lead Director individually, and any committee of the Board as a group.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board of Directors believes that the proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Accordingly, The Board regularly reviews the company’s governance practices and believes that we have solid and efficient mechanisms in place to allow stockholders to communicate with the Board and bring items to its attention, including at annual and special stockholders’ meetings. Consequently, the Board of Directors recommends athat you vote “AGAINST”AGAINST this proposal for the reasons described below..

Stericycle’s current ownership threshold balances the preservation of this important stockholder right with the financial and administrative burdens that would result from misuse of the process by a small minority of stockholders with narrow interests.

Convening a special meeting of stockholders is a significant undertaking that requires a substantial commitment of time and financial resources. The Board and management would also be required to divert time from the business to prepare for and conduct the meeting. Because of these burdens and costs, special stockholder meetings should be extraordinary events that occur only when there are urgent and important strategic matters or profound fiduciary concerns. The current threshold of at least 25% of our company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock allows stockholders owning a reasonable minority of our company’s shares to call special meetings while preventing a small minority of stockholders from calling special meetings that would use corporate resources on proposals that may not reflect the best interests of our company and the broader stockholder base. If the proposal were adopted, a small minority of stockholders – potentially with narrow, short-term interests – could call special meetings to present proposals that are unlikely to garner significant support, without regard to how the costs and other burdens might impact the Company’s future success or the interests of the vast majority of stockholders.

Stericycle is committed to stockholder engagement and sound governance practices.

Company leaders meet regularly with stockholders to discuss our strategy, operational performance and business practices. We also meet with stockholders to share perspectives on corporate governance, executive compensation and sustainability matters, among other topics. We strongly believe that this commitment to ongoing dialogue with our stockholders, together with practices such as annual Director elections, a “proxy access” right for nominating Directors, no supermajority voting provisions, and our stockholders’ existing right to call special meetings protects stockholder rights without the expense and risk associated with a lower special meeting threshold.

Stericycle continues to enhance its corporate governance practices.

Our company has made a number of corporate governance enhancements in recent years. The Board added two new directors, both with extensive business transformation experience, in 2018. This continues the Board’s refreshment efforts, with a majority of the Board consisting of new independent directors added in the last five years and ensuring that the Board has the right expertise to execute on our company’s strategic vision. The Board appointed new chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees in recent years. Our Board enhanced its diversity through the addition of a number of diverse members over the last five years. The Board of Directors is also leveraging a competency and skills matrix to guide evolution of the composition of the Board. In addition, our Nominating & Governance Committee regularly evaluates the structure of the Board of Directors and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding potential governance changes.

For the reasons set forth above, the proposal is neither necessary nor in stockholders’ best interests.

Therefore, your Board of Directors recommends that you voteAGAINST this proposal.

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • 4659


OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters

As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board of Directors does not know of any other business to come before the Annual Meeting for consideration by our stockholders. If any other business should properly come before the meeting, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will vote the shares of common stock represented by the proxy in accordance with their judgment.

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • 47


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20172020 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting

Any stockholder who wishes to present a proposal for consideration at our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and to have the proposal included in our proxy statement for the meeting, must submit the proposal to us by December 16, 2016.12, 2019. Stockholder proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement must comply with the rules of the SEC in order to be included and should be sent to Investor Relations, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.

In accordance with our bylaws, any stockholder who wishes to present a proposal from the floor for consideration at our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, without inclusion of such matters in our proxy materials, must submit proper notice to us no earlier than January 26, 201723, 2020 and no later than February 25, 2017.

22, 2020.

Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to the secretarySecretary of the Company no earlier than the close of business on November 16, 2016,12, 2019, and no later than the close of business on December 16, 2016.12, 2019.

 

2016Proxy Statement60  Stericycle, Inc. • 48 - 2019 Proxy Statement


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEAPPENDIX A Definition and Reconciliation ofNon-GAAP Measures

Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, and Tax (“Adjusted EBIT”) is Income from operations excluding specified items outlined in the table below. Management believes the adjusted financial measures represent the amounts directly related to the ongoing operations of the business and uses these measures in evaluating performance. All adjusted financial measures are intended to supplement the applicable U.S. GAAP measures and should not be considered in isolation from, or a replacement for, financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to or calculated in the same manner asNon-GAAP financial measures published by other companies.

The company calculates Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) by dividing Adjusted Net Operating Profit after Tax (“NOPAT”) by the average of the prior two year ending amounts for Invested Capital. Stericycle uses the following calculation for Invested Capital: Total Assets less Cash and Equivalents, less Short Term Investments, less Current Liabilities, plus Current Portion of Long Term Debt. “NOPAT” is calculated by reducing “Adjusted EBIT” (referenced above) by Intangible Amortization and current year acquisitions and multiplying by (1 – Adjusted Tax Rate) plus Intangible Amortization. The adjusted tax rate is calculated by dividing thePre-tax Book Income excluding specified items outlined in table below by Income Tax Benefit/(Expense) plus the tax impact of the specified items (referenced above). In order to normalize the “ROIC” equation for the fact that Intangible Amortization is added back to “NOPAT”, the Accumulated Amortization of Intangible Assets is also added back to the average Invested Capital.

Adjusted Earnings Before Interest and Tax (“Adjusted EBIT”)

    Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4  Total 

Income from Operations US GAAP

  

 

54.1

 

  

 

62.4

 

  

 

68.3

 

  

 

(345.9

 

 

(161.1

Business Transformation

  

 

22.1

 

  

 

21.8

 

  

 

21.0

 

  

 

17.7

 

 

 

82.6

 

Intangible Amortization

  

 

31.9

 

  

 

32.9

 

  

 

31.8

 

  

 

33.7

 

 

 

130.3

 

Acquisition and Integration

  

 

4.1

 

  

 

1.8

 

  

 

1.6

 

  

 

2.3

 

 

 

9.8

 

Operational Optimization

  

 

8.9

 

  

 

7.0

 

  

 

3.6

 

  

 

9.9

 

 

 

29.4

 

Divestitures

  

 

4.1

 

  

 

13.0

 

  

 

2.0

 

  

 

1.4

 

 

 

20.5

 

Litigation, Settlements, and Regulatory Compliance

  

 

27.5

 

  

 

16.4

 

  

 

17.3

 

  

 

32.0

 

 

 

93.2

 

Impairment

  

 

0.0

 

  

 

0.0

 

  

 

0.0

 

  

 

385.2

 

 

 

385.2

 

Other

  

 

5.8

 

  

 

2.9

 

  

 

6.2

 

  

 

14.2

 

 

 

29.1

 

Income from Operations (Adjusted)

  

 

158.5

 

  

 

158.2

 

  

 

151.8

 

  

 

150.5

 

 

 

619.0

 

Depreciation

  

 

30.8

 

  

 

32.7

 

  

 

32.1

 

  

 

30.0

 

 

 

125.6

 

EBITDA (Adjusted)

  

 

189.3

 

  

 

190.9

 

  

 

183.9

 

  

 

180.5

 

 

 

744.6

 

Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement61


APPENDIX A DEFINITION AND RECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP MEASURES

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceAdjusted Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”)    

 

2018 Total

Net Operating Profit After Tax (“NOPAT”)

Income from Operations US GAAP

(161.1

Business Transformation

82.6

Acquisition and Integration

9.8

Operational Optimization

29.4

Divestitures

20.5

Litigation, Settlements, and Regulatory Compliance

93.2

Impairment

385.2

Other

29.1

Current Year Acquisitions

(3.4

Net Operating Profit Before Tax

485.4

Pre-tax Book Income

(275.4

Adjustments

780.2

Pre-tax Book Income (Adjusted)

504.8

Tax (Benefit)/Expense

(29.8

Tax Impact of Adjustments

155.6

Adjusted Tax Benefit/Expense

125.8

Tax Rate as Reported

10.8%

Tax Rate Adjusted

24.6%

Net Operating Profit After Tax

368.5

Intangible Amortization

130.3

NOPAT

498.8

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons beneficially owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock to file periodic reports of stock ownership and stock transactions with the SEC. On the basis of a review of copies of these reports, we believe that all filing requirements for 2015 were satisfied in a timely manner, with the exception that, due to administrative error, Messrs. Brown and Chen each filed a late report in connection with their purchase on September 10, 2015 of depositary shares, each representing a 1Invested Capital         /10th interest in a share of our 5.25% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock.

    2017
Total
  2018
Total
 

Total Assets

  

 

6,988.3

 

 

 

6,455.5

 

less: Cash

  

 

(42.2

 

 

(34.3

less: Short Term Investments

  

 

(0.1

 

 

0.0

 

less: Current Liabilities

  

 

(969.4

 

 

(733.2

plus: Current Portion of Long Term Debt

  

 

119.5

 

 

 

104.3

 

Invested Capital

  

 

6,096.1

 

 

 

5,792.3

 

Average Invested Capital (2017 and 2018)

   

 

5,944.2

 

plus: Accumulated Amortization

   

 

499.9

 

Invested Capital

   

 

6,444.1

 

Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”)

      

 

7.7%

 

 

2016Proxy Statement62  Stericycle, Inc. • 49 - 2019 Proxy Statement


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

APPENDIX A DEFINITION AND RECONCILIATION OFAdditional InformationNON-GAAP

We will provide a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 without charge to each stockholder as of the record date who sends a written request to Investor Relations, Stericycle, Inc., 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. Copies of this proxy statement and our Form 10-K as filed with the SEC are available in .pdf format on our website,www.stericycle.com. Copies of this proxy statement and our Form 10-K also may be accessed directly from the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. MEASURES

 

2016Proxy StatementAdjusted EPS

  

Stericycle, Inc. • 50Year Ended December 31, 2018 

(Loss) Earnings Per Share


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

EXHIBIT A

Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan

ARTICLE 1

Purpose

Stericycle, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) to provide eligible employees of the Company and the Participating Companies (as defined herein) with an opportunity to become owners of the Company through the purchase of shares of Common Stock. The Plan shall become effective only upon approval thereof by the Company’s stockholders (which date shall be the “Effective Date” of the Plan as set forth herein) and, once effective, shall remain in effect until all shares reserved for issuance hereunder have been issued or until the Plan is otherwise terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.1 hereof.

ARTICLE 2

Definitions

2.1    Accountmeans a separate bookkeeping account maintained for each Participant, which reflects the accumulated payroll deductions made on behalf of the Participant for any Offering Period, reduced for any distributions from such Account pursuant to the provisions of the Plan.

2.2    Boardmeans the Company’s Board of Directors.

2.3    Canadian Subsidiarymeans a Subsidiary that is incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada.

2.4    Closing Pricemeans, as of any date, the last reported sales price of a share of Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

2.5    Codemeans the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2.6    Common Stockmeans the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

2.7    Companymeans Stericycle, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.8    Compensationmeans gross salary or wages.

2.9    Eligible Employeemeans, in respect of an Offering Period, (a) a full-time Employee who has completed six months’ employment as of the first day of the Offering Period or (ii) a part-time Employee who customarily works more than 20 hours per week and who has completed six months’ employment as of the first day of the Offering Period.

2.10    Effective Date is defined in Article 1.

2.11    Employeemeans an employee of a Participating Company. For purposes of the Plan, references to “employment” are to employment by the Company or a Canadian Subsidiary of the Company.

2.12    Enrollment Agreementmeans the Participant’s election to participate in the Plan for an Offering Period and to have his or her Compensation reduced for such Offering Period to purchase shares of Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

U.S. GAAP EPS

 

$(2.91

)

Adjustments:

2016Proxy Statement

Business Transformation

  Stericycle, Inc. • A-1


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

0.71

 

2.13    Exercise Date means the last day of an Offering Period (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day).

2.14    Offering Periodmeans the period beginning on July 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 and each six month period commencing thereafter beginning on each January 1 and July 1, respectively.

2.15    Optionmeans the right of a Participant to purchase shares of Common Stock in an Offering Period.

2.16    Option Grant Datemeans the first day of an Offering Period.

2.17    Option Pricemeans the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under the Plan on the Exercise Date, which price shall be equal to 95% of the Closing Price of a share of Common Stock on the Exercise Date.

2.18    Participantmeans with respect to any Offering Period, an Eligible Employee who has elected to participate in the Plan for that Offering Period by filing an Enrollment Agreement for such Offering Period.

2.19    Participating Company means any Canadian Subsidiary which has been designated as a Participating Company for purposes of the Plan by the Company or the Plan Administrator. A Participating Company shall cease to be a Participating Company on the date specified by the Company or the Plan Administrator. A list of the Participating Companies as of the Effective Date is set forth in Appendix A hereto.

2.20    Planmeans the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

2.21    Plan Administratormeans the Board or the committee of the Board or the administrative committee of officers or other employees of the Company to which the Board has delegated its authority to administer the Plan.

2.22    Subsidiarymeans a subsidiary corporation with respect to the Company as determined in accordance with Section 424(f) of the Code.

ARTICLE 3

Shares Available

3.1    Shares Reserved. The shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan shall be shares currently authorized but unissued or currently held or subsequently acquired by the Company as treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market or in private transactions (including shares purchased in the open market with Participants’ Account balances under the Plan). Subject to the provisions of Section 3.3, the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 100,000 shares.

3.2    Reusage of Shares. In the event of the expiration, withdrawal, termination or other cancellation of an Option under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that were subject to the Option but not delivered shall again be available for issuance under the Plan.

3.3    Adjustments to Shares Reserved.In the event of any transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, spinoff, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination, exchange or other distribution with respect to shares of Common Stock or other change in the corporate structure or capitalization affecting the Common Stock), the Plan Administrator shall make such adjustments to the Plan and Options under the Plan as the Plan Administrator determines appropriate in its sole discretion to preserve the benefits or potential benefits of the Plan and the Options. Action by the Plan Administrator may include (a) adjustment of the number and kind of shares which are or may be subject to Options under the Plan, (b) adjustment of the

2016Proxy Statement

Intangible Amortization

  Stericycle, Inc. • A-2

1.12


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Acquisition and Integration

0.09

Operational Optimization

0.26

Divestitures

0.18

Litigation, Settlements and Regulatory Compliance

0.85

Impairment

3.62

Other

0.29

Capital Allocation

0.14

U.S. Tax Reform

0.10

Adjusted EPS

$ 4.45

 

number and kind of shares subject to outstanding Options under the Plan, (c) adjustment to the Exercise Price of outstanding Options under the Plan, (d) cancellation of outstanding Options, and (e) any other adjustments that the Plan Administrator determines to be equitable.

3.4    Insufficient Shares. If, on an Exercise Date, Participants in the aggregate have outstanding Options to purchase more shares of Common Stock than are then available for purchase under the Plan, each Participant shall be eligible to purchase a reduced number of shares of Common Stock on a pro rata basis and any excess payroll deductions shall be returned to such Participants, without interest, all as provided by uniform and nondiscriminatory rules adopted by the Plan Administrator.

ARTICLE 4

Plan Administration

The Plan shall be administered by the Plan Administrator.Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Plan Administrator shall have the authority and duty to (a) manage and control the operation of the Plan; (b) conclusively interpret and construe the provisions of the Plan, and prescribe, amend and rescind rules, regulations and procedures relating to the Plan; (c) correct any defect or omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan; (d) determine whether and to what extent a company will be a Participating Company; and (e) make all other determinations and take all other actions as it deems necessary or desirable for the implementation and administration of the Plan. The determination of the Plan Administrator on matters within its authorities shall be conclusive and binding on the Company, the Participating Companies, the Participants and all other persons. Any decision of the Plan Administrator shall be made by a majority of its members.

ARTICLE 5

Participation

An individual who is an Eligible Employee on the first day of an Offering Period may elect to become a Participant in the Plan for that Offering Period by completing and filing an Enrollment Agreement in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Plan Administrator. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, individuals who are not treated as common law employees by the Company or a Participating Company on their payroll records are excluded from Plan participation even if a court or administrative agency determines that such individuals are common law employees and not independent contractors.No employee of the Company or any Participating Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan if the Plan Administrator determines that such participation could be in violation of any local law.

ARTICLE 6

Options

6.1    Option Grants. As of each Option Grant Date, each Eligible Employee who is a Participant for such Offering Period shall be deemed to have been granted an “Option” under the Plan which, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, grants the Participant the right to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Plan on the Exercise Date and at the Option Price.

6.2    Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary:

(a)No Participant may purchase under the Plan (or any other employee stock purchase plan of the Company or any Subsidiary) in any calendar year shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value (as determined as of the Option Grant Date) in excess of $25,000.

(b)No Option shall be granted to any Eligible Employee if, immediately after the Option is granted, he or she would own (or would be deemed to own, applying the rules of Section 423(b)(3) of the Code) stock possessing 5% or more of the voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any Subsidiary.

 

2016Stericycle, Inc. - 2019 Proxy Statement Stericycle, Inc. • A-363


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

2019PROXY STATEMENT

Stericycle’s Global

Sustainability Highlights

The provisions of Section 6.2 shall be interpreted in accordance with Section 423(b)(8)Stericycle provides essential sustainability services that help protect communities from harmful wastes, enable recycling and alternative use opportunities, and lead to greater consumer safety and satisfaction. Here is a sample of the Code. For purposes of this Article 6, the rules of Section 424(d) of the Code shall applyglobal annual impact we made in determining the stock ownership of an individual.

6.3    Payroll Deductions.A Participant’s Enrollment Agreement shall specify the percentage of his or her Compensation for the Offering Period that the Participant elects2018 to have withheld and credited to his or her Account for purposes of exercising the Participant’s Option for that Offering Period. The Participant may specify any whole percentage of his or her Compensation not exceeding $5,000 during any Offering Period (appropriately increased or reduced in the case of any Offering Period longer or shorter than six months). Payroll deductions shall begin with the first regular payroll period ending on or after the first day of the Offering Period and end with the last regular payroll period ending on or before the Exercise Date (or, if earlier, upon the termination of the Participant’s employment or other termination of participation in the Plan). Except as provided in Article 7, a Participant may not change his or her payroll deductions during an Offering Period and a Participant’s Enrollment Agreement shall remain in effect indefinitely (for both the Offering Period in respect of which it was initially filed and all subsequent Offering Periods) unless the Participant modifies such Enrollment Agreement for a subsequent Offering Period or the Participant’s participation in the Plan terminates. A Participant’s payroll deductions shall be further subject to the following:

(a)If a Participant’s Compensation is insufficient in any payroll period to allow the entire payroll deduction contemplated under the Plan and his or her Enrollment Agreement, no deduction will be made for such payroll period. Payroll deductions will resume with the next payroll period in which the Participant has Compensation sufficient to allow for the deductions. Payroll deductions under the Plan shall be made in any payroll period only after other withholdings, deductions, garnishments and the like have been made, and only if the remaining Compensation is sufficient to allow the entire payroll deduction contemplated.

(b)All payroll deductions made with respect to a Participant shall be credited to his or her Account under the Plan. A Participant may participate in the Plan only through payroll deductions and no other contributions will be accepted. No interest will accrue or be paid on any amount credited to a Participant’s Account (or withheld from a Participant’s pay). Except as otherwise provided in Article 7 all amounts in a Participant’s Account will be used to purchase shares of Common Stock and no cash refunds will be made from such Account.

6.4    Option Exercise.On each Exercise Date, each Participant whose participation in the Plan for that Offering Period has not terminated shall be deemed to have exercised his or her Option with respect to that number of whole shares of Common Stock equal to the quotient of (i) the balance in the Participant’s Account as of the Exercise Date and (ii) the Exercise Price.

6.5    Registration/Certificates. Shares of Common Stock purchased by a Participant under the Plan shall be issued in the name of the Participant. Shares of Common Stock will be uncertificated; provided, however, that a stock certificate for whole shares shall be delivered to the Participant the upon the Participant’s request.

6.6    Excess Account Balances.Any amounts remaining in a Participant’s Account as of any Exercise Date after the purchase of shares of Common Stock described herein shall be distributed to the Participant, without interest, as soon as practicable after the Exercise Date; provided, however, that any amounts attributable to any fractional share that was not purchased on the Exercise Date shall be carried over to the next Offering Period unless the Participant’s participation in the Plan terminates at the end of the Offering Period.

ARTICLE 7

Termination of Participation

7.1    Termination of Employment. In the event that a Participant’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates during an Offering Period and prior to the Exercise Date of the Offering Period for any reason (whether as a result of his or her resignation, death or otherwise), the Participant’s Option shall beprotect what matters:

 

2016Proxy StatementLOGO  

Medical Waste Management

Stericycle, Inc. • A-41.8 BILLION POUNDS

of Medical Waste Safely Treated

LOGO

Secure Information Destruction

1.5 BILLION POUNDS

of Paper Recycled

LOGO

Pharmaceutical Waste Disposal

85 MILLION POUNDS

of Drugs Safely Disposed

LOGO

Hazardous Waste Service

1.2 BILLION POUNDS

of RCRA Wastes Properly Managed

LOGO

Sharps Management

56 MILLION POUNDS

of Plastic Diverted from Landfills

LOGO

Sustainable Solutions

84 MILLION POUNDS

of Wastes Diverted from Landfills

LOGO

Maritime Solutions

83 MILLION POUNDS

of Maritime Wastes Diverted from Landfills


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

automatically cancelled as of the date of the Participant’s termination of employment and no shares of Common Stock will be purchased for the Participant for the Offering Period in which his or her termination occurs. All amounts remaining in the Participant’s Account as of his or her termination date shall be refunded to the Participant, without interest, as soon as practicable after the Participant’s termination date.

 

7.2    Learn more about our sustainability efforts at

Election To Cease Participation.stericycle.com/about-us/sustainability. A Participant may elect to cease participation in an Offering Period at any time prior to the Exercise Date and receive a refund of the balance in his or her Account. The Participant’s election shall serve to cancel the Participant’s Option and terminate his or her participation in both the current Offering Period and all subsequent Offering Periods and no shares of Common Stock will be purchased for the Participant for the Offering Period in which his or her election to cease participation is effective. An election to cease participation in an Offering Period shall be made in the manner and within the time prior to the Exercise Date that the Plan Administrator specifies. Any refund of the Participant’s Account balance pursuant to the Participant’s election pursuant to this Section 7.2 shall be paid to him or her, without interest, as soon as practicable following his or her election to cease participation. A Participant’s election to cease participation for one Offering Period shall not affect his or her eligibility to participate in subsequent Offering Periods, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

 

7.3    Account Balances. No interest shall accrue on any amounts credited to a Participant’s Account. After the close of each Offering Period, a report shall be sent to each Participant (or made available to the Participant through a third party provider) stating the entries made to his or her Account, the number of shares of Common Stock purchased upon exercise of Options for such Offering Period, and the applicable Option Price.


LOGO

28161 N. Keith Drive Lake Forest, IL 60045 800-643-0240 | stericycle.com 2019 Stericycle, Inc. All payroll deductions made under the Plan may be used by the Company for any corporate purpose and the Company shall not be obligated to segregate such payroll deductions except as required by applicable law.rights reserved.

ARTICLE 8

Miscellaneous Provisions

8.1    Amendment and Termination.


LOGO

STERICYCLE, INC. The Board may amend, suspend or terminate this Plan at any time. The Company’s stockholders shall be required to approve any amendment that as required by applicable law or the rules of any securities exchange on which the shares of Common Stock are traded, including an amendment to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan or a change in the eligibility provisions of the Plan.

8.2    Nontransferability of Options. No Participant in an Offering Period may sell, pledge, transfer or otherwise dispose of his or her Option under any circumstances.

8.3    No Right to Employment; Limitation of Implied Rights.The Plan does not constitute a contract of employment or continued service and participation in the Plan will not give any employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any Participating Company or any right or claim to any benefit under the Plan unless such right or claim has specifically accrued under the terms of the Plan. Participation in the Plan by a Participant shall not create any rights in such Participant as a stockholder of the Company until shares of Common Stock are registered in the name of the Participant.

8.4    Notices. Notices required or permitted under this Plan shall be considered to have been duly given if sent by certified or registered mail addressed to the Plan Administrator at the Company’s principal office or to any other person at his or her address as it appears on the Company’s payroll or other records.

8.5    Severability. If any provision of this Plan is held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions, and the Plan shall be construed and administered as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

8.6    Governing Law. The laws of the State of Delaware will govern all matters relating to the Plan except to the extent they are superseded by the laws of the United States.

28161 NORTH KEITH DRIVE

LAKE FOREST, IL 60045

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E72384-P17486                KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • A-5THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

8.7    Compliance with Applicable Laws; Limits on Issuance. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Company shall have no liability to deliver any shares of Common Stock under the Plan unless such delivery or distribution would comply with all applicable laws (including, without limitation, the requirements of the Securities Act, and the applicable requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity on which the Common Stock is listed). Prior to the issuance of any shares of Common Stock under the Plan, the Company may require a written statement that the recipient is acquiring the shares for investment and not for the purpose or with the intention of distributing the shares and will not dispose of them in violation of the registration requirements of the Securities Act. All shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant Options granted hereunder shall be subject to any applicable restrictions contained in the Company’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws. In addition, the Committee may impose such restrictions on any shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of Options as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Common Stock is then listed and/or traded, and restrictions under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Common Stock.

 

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • A-6


EXHIBIT A STERICYCLE, INC. CANADIAN EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

APPENDIX A

PARTICIPATING COMPANIES

Stericycle, ULC and Subsidiaries

2016Proxy StatementStericycle, Inc. • A-7


LOGO

28161 North Keith Drive

Lake Forest, Illinois 60045

2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

May 25, 2016

Your vote is important!

Please sign and promptly return your proxy card or voting instruction card in the enclosed envelope or, if your shares are registered in your name, vote your shares telephonically, by calling (800) 690-6903, or via the Internet, by going to www.proxyvote.com.

If your shares are registered in the name of a broker, you may be able to vote your shares telephonically or via the internet. Check the information provided to you by your broker to see which options are available to you.

Admission Request Form for 2016 Annual Meeting

I am a stockholder of Stericycle, Inc. (If your shares are registered in a broker’s name, please enclose confirmation of stock ownership.) I plan to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, at the DoubleTree Hotel Chicago O’Hare Airport-Rosemont, 5460 North River Road, Rosemont, Illinois 60018. Please send me an admissions card. I understand thatan admissions card will admit only the stockholder or stockholders to whom it is issued, and may not be transferred.

Name


Please print name of stockholder
Name


Please print name of stockholder (if joint owner)
Address


STERICYCLE, INC.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all

nominees for director, FOR Items 2 and 3, and AGAINST

Item 4.

1.

Election of Directors

For

Against

Abstain

1a.  Robert S. Murley

ForAgainstAbstain    

1b. Cindy J. Miller

1i.   Kay G. Priestly

☐    

1c.  Brian P. Anderson

1j.   Mike S. Zafirovski

☐    

1d. Lynn D. Bleil

1e.  Thomas F. Chen

1f.   J. Joel Hackney, Jr.

1g. Veronica M. Hagen

1h.  Stephen C. Hooley

2.   Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

☐    

3.   Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019

☐    

4.   Stockholder proposal entitled Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

☐    

NOTE: This proxy will be voted in the best judgment of the proxies in respect of any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

City

For address changes, mark here.

(see reverse for instructions)

 

 


Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 State


Zip Code


Telephone 

()    

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


 

 

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please detach, complete and return the Admission Request Form above directly to Stericycle, Inc., Annual Meeting Ticket Requests, 28161 North Keith Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.All Admission Request Forms must be received by May 18, 2016.

 

To avoid a delay in receipt of your admissions card, mail the Admission Request Form separately. Do not return it with your proxy card or mail it in the enclosed envelope.

If you need directions to the Annual Meeting, please call Investor Relations at (800) 643-0240 ext. 2012.


LOGO

STERICYCLE, INC.
28161 NORTH KEITH DRIVE LAKE FOREST, IL 60045
VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 24, 2016. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 24, 2016. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E09173-P77585 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
STERICYCLE, INC.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR
all nominees for director, FOR Items 2, 3 and 4, and
AGAINST Items 5 and 6.
1. Election of Directors For Against Abstain
1a. Mark C. Miller For Against Abstain
1b. Jack W. Schuler 1i. John Patience
1c. Charles A. Alutto 1j. Mike S. Zafirovski
1d. Lynn D. Bleil 2. Approval Purchase Plan of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock
3. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
1e. Thomas D. Brown the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for 2016
1f. Thomas F. Chen 4. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation
1g. Rod F. Dammeyer 5. Stockholder proposal on independent chairman
1h. William K. Hall 6. Stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”
NOTE: This proxy will be voted in the best judgment of the
For address changes, mark here. proxies in respect of any other business that properly comes
(see reverse for instructions) before the Annual Meeting.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint
owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice, Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.
E09174-P77585

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
E72385-P17486    

STERICYCLE, INC.

20162019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Wednesday, May 25, 201622, 2019 at 11:008:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time

The DoubleTree HotelLoews Chicago O’Hare Airport—Rosemont 5460 NorthHotel

5300 N. River Road

Rosemont, Illinois 60018

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

I or we hereby appoint each of Jack W. Schuler, Rod F. DammeyerBrian P. Anderson, Lynn D. Bleil and John PatienceMike S. Zafirovski (the “proxies”) as my or our proxy, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and authorize each of them acting alone to vote all of the shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Stericycle, Inc. (the “Company”) held of record by me or us on March 28, 20162019 at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 201622, 2019 at 11:008:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time, at the DoubleTree HotelLoews Chicago O’Hare Airport-Rosemont, 5460 NorthHotel, 5300 N. River Road, Rosemont, Illinois 60018, and at any adjournment of the Annual Meeting.

If properly completed and returned, this Proxy will be voted as directed. If no direction is given, this Proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Company’s Board of Directors, i.e., FOR each of the 10 nominees for election as a director (Item 1), FOR approval of the Stericycle, Inc. Canadian Employee Stock Purchase Planadvisory vote to approve executive compensation (Item 2), FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019 (Item 3), FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Item 4), AGAINST the stockholder proposal on independent chairman (Item 5) and AGAINST the stockholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access”Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement (Item 6)4). This Proxy will be voted in the best judgment of the proxies in respect of any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

PLEASE MARK, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE
Address changes/comments:             

Address changes/comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark the corresponding box on the reverse side.)

(Continued and to be signed on reverse side.)